Austrian Journal of Technical and Natural Sciences

Квантовомеханическое взаимодействие, безмассовое и безэнергетическое (Квантовохронометрическое представление)

Штерн Александр Геннадиевич, Штерн Павел Геннадиевич

Published Jan 1, 2015• 0 citations

Abstract

Microscopic phenomena, in the part available to supervision and measurements which are carried out by means of comparisons of the phenomena with macroscopic changes, by means of introduction of the idea of intervals between disappearance of the previous one and emergence of the subsequent one, are compared with pieces of the chain of macro-changes, it leads to introduction of the notion of time as the only means to describe results of supervision and measurements. In this case, the theory which does not contain unobserved magnitudes, is nothing more than a system of ratios and ratios changes between above-mentioned intervals. The presented work — creation of the description of the quantum mechanical interaction which does not include unobserved magnitudes, based on impossibility to judge about objects free from interaction, and abstract from intercation which existence — is a fruit of imagination about what does not have a certain position in relation to similar ones, especially capable to a certain change. The word “mechanics” in the work is used due to the historical tradition to denote thematic charachteristic of the work. In the work are made equations coinciding in a form with Schrodinger’s equations, where the contained magnitudes have different physical maintenance.

Related papers

Quantum Physics and Quantum Computation

Andreas Wichert

Classical mechanics is usually valid at the macro scale. The changes in the position and the momentum of the object over time are described by the Hamiltonian equation of motion. The wave function in quantum mechanics, if unobserved, evolves in a smooth and continuous way according to the Schrodinger equation, which is related to the Hamiltonian equation of motion. This equation describes a linear superposition of different states at time. A quantum mechanical description of a physical system is related to a probabilistic representation; it is described by a vector in Hilbert space. This description extends the two- or three-dimensional Euclidean space into spaces that have any finite or infinite number of dimensions. The state of a compound system is projected to the subspace that corresponds to the observed state and the vector representing the state is renormalized to the unit length. An observable describes a subspace for some dimensions with a special case of one dimension.

Chapman & Hall/CRC eBooksNov 28, 20230 citations

Speculation of Quantum Bound State Thermodynamics

Francesco R. Ruggeri

Historically, thermodynamics was formulated for macroscopic systems followed by the development of statistical mechanics which provided microscopic formulations for quantities such as entropy. Entropy is traditionally linked to the ln of the number states available or to the Shannon’s form -k Sum over i P(ei) ln(P(ei)) where P(ei) is the probability for the quantity ei. In addition a variable T (linked to average kinetic energy) appears in both theories. Later the Schrodinger equation was developed to describe bound electron states in an atom etc. These states were characterized by a math object W(x) called the wavefunction and a set of discrete energy levels was calculated which matched data of emitted photons. In a previous note (1) we argued that the average energy En for a quantum bound state plays the same role of characterizing equilibrium as T in classical thermodynamics/statistical mechanics. We further argued that En is linked to parameters in the system. For example, for a particle in a box with infinite potential walls, En is linked to L as well as to n the energy level. One may change En by either changing n or L separately (or both). Holding L constant and changing n leads to a certain type of energy change. We argue this is similar to holding the volume of a gas constant and increasing T. Alternatively, one may leave n unchanged (a quantum adiabatic process) and change L i.e. a mechanical change or work. We argue that one may already consider the concept of the first law of thermodynamics at the quantum bound state level i.e. dE = dQ - dWork where Work is linked to a change in a physical parameter, such as L the length of the box, whereas dQ is linked to energy changes not involving a physical parameter e.g. a change in n the energy level. The Schrodinger equation yields solutions for W(x)=Sum over p a(p)exp(ipx) the wavefunction as well as En’s. We have argued in previous notes that W(x) is part of a conditional probability P(p/x)= a(p)exp(ipx)/W(x) and that En is constant at each point x just as T is constant at each x for classical statistical equilibrium (1). Thus a kind of statistical mechanics exists at the wavefunction level we argue. This statistical mechanics makes use of a free particle wavefunction exp(ipx) and weights a(p), but does not contain the usual P(x), P(p) picture of the classical world. We have shown in (2) that one may obtain P(x)=W*(x)W(x) and P(p)=a*(p)a(p) from the conditional probability. The essential physics we argue, however, is at the level of the wavefunction together with its own unique statistical scenario of exp(ipx)’s interacting with exp(ikx)’s from V(x)=Sum over Vkexp(ikx) (see (1)). Given that P(x) and P(p) exist for a quantum bound state, it may be convenient to use them in formulas because they are linked to a classical statistical picture. We argue that one may use P(x) and P(p) to construct an object S such that T dS does not change when one changes L, the size of box with infinite potential walls. We argue that such an object follows from properties of the Schrodinger equation together with various assumptions. We arrive at S=Sp+Sx where Sp=-k Integral dp a(p)a(p) ln{|a(p)a(p)}| and Sx= -k Integral dx W(x)W(x) ln(W(x)W(x)) for a given energy level. We do not use arguments related to taking ln of the number of states present or Shannon’s entropy. Rather we look for a solution which does not depend on L and is additive. We note, however, that for both W(x)W(x) and a(p)a(p) the solution found is mathematically consistent with the entropy form found by considering independent probabilities. This, however, applies to P(x) and P(p), but we argue that the physical situation is based on W(x) and a(p) as solutions of the Schrodinger equation. Nevertheless P(x) and P(p) are physical observables and not simply math constructs and so may think of them in a somewhat classical manner in terms of probability. Thus we argue that thermodynamics is already present at the level of a quantum bound state and that one may obtain Shannon’s entropy at this level using P(x) and P(p), but without considering the overall probability of independent probabilities as in information theory or numbers of states. Rather obtaining a function which is additive in Sp and Sx and eliminates L is the main consideration. We also argue that S=Sp+Sx carries over into mixed quantum state wavefunctions even though it is usually ignored. Thus we try to argue that it is the bound quantum state which gives rise to the notion of thermodynamics and entropy.

Feb 16, 20220 citations

Изучение законов микромира, характерные отличия и особенности физических процессов микроскопических систем

Б. К. Рахашев, Ж. А. Абекова, А. Б. Оралбаев +1 more

Laws and the equations of quantum mechanics and behavior of particles in a microcosm completely differ from laws and the equations of classical mechanics, in a microcosm such phenomena which have no analogs in classical mechanics, for example tunnel effect, etc. meet. In a microcosm the coordinate and an impulse of a particle are defined according to Heisenberg’s uncertainty, these particles show properties characteristic for a wave, energy is let out and absorbed in the separate portions, in quanta.

Jan 1, 20150 citations

Методические аспекты изучения классической теории и квантовой теории в вузе

О. А. Янкевич

Both in quantum and classical physics there are some difficulties. Overcoming these difficulties may require some modification of these theories. Definitions of «classical» and «quantum» quantities are suggested. These definitions are supposed to be used in modern and as well as in «modified» physical theories for the purpose of distinguishing classical and quantum behavior of the studied objects.

Известия Самарского научного центра Российской академии наукJan 1, 20100 citations

Wave with Self-Spacetime Creating Notion of Average Particle in Wave-Particle Duality?

Francesco R. Ruggeri

A quantum particle is often described as exhibiting dual particle-wave nature. A particle seems to be an object which obeys Newton’s laws/special relativity with a wave also being a phenomenon existing in Newtonian mechanics (special relativity). In other words the particle and wave are governed by x-t external variables which have infinite resolution. It was originally thought that x and t in addition to being external were absolute, but special relativity changed this idea. We have suggested in previous notes that a free quantum particle with energy E and momentum p creates its own space time i.e time intervals are proportional to 1/E and space to 1/p. This means no external clock is needed and different internal rulers and clocks exist for different E,p. It also suggests finite time and space intervals. In fact, an absolute is introduced namely A=0 = -Et+px with t and x being independent. This suggests that t→b/E and x→b/p. A is the free particle Lagrangian (both relativistic and nonrelativistic) with x and t being considered independent. Thus we suggest that the external x ruler and t clock of Newtonian mechanics represent an average of the internal picture and are also described by A, but with x/t=v and not x and t being treated as independent. In (1) we showed that having discrete x spacing with a running time (i.e. Netwon’s time variable) and insisting on spatial invariance leads to dA/dx partial = p. Thus instead of considering particle wave duality we suggest an underlying wave structure which creates its own spacetime intervals (1/E, 1/p), but may be mapped in certain situations to the external running x and t of Newton’s theory. For example, consider an electron (a quantum particle) with a fixed p moving over a distance much greater than its wavelength. It may be mapped to Newton’s external running x,t values with x=vt, but this is an average mapping into continuous x and t. In reality the situation is more complicated because there may be a Bohm-Aharonov effect occurring. Thus the underlying wave picture is in fact physically important and linked to interactions. Thus a self-ruler is not simply a measuring device - interactions may occur unlike in the case of the external ruler. Given that p defines a kind of spatial invariance approximated by a periodic function exp(ipx) (eigenfunction of -id/dx) and that Newton’s running time is not needed in a quantum bound state equilibrium, one may wonder what one should do in the case of a particle bound in a V(x) potential. In Newtonian mechanics V(x) suggests non-spatial invariance and v(x) velocity changes with x as well in contrast with exp(ipx) which is periodically invariant. In fact Newtonian mechanics (and Lagrangian/Hamiltonian as well) focus on d/dt i.e x(t). We have argued above that time intervals 1/E are independent of 1/p spatial ones. It may be noticed, however, that different p values lead to different wavelengths and so even though there is a kind of spatial invariance for each, when compared to each other this invariance is broken and superpositions of exp(ipx) may create local x probability densities. At the same they create spatial momentum densities because -d/dx (d/dx) 1/2m yields a kind of average kinetic energy when normalized. This seems to describe the x-p uncertainty relationship. In order to create spatial resolution (other than the built-in one in the wavelength) one needs to superpose different momenta, each of which are spatially invariant according to their periodic scheme exp(ipx). Thus one may create an average 1/2m <pp> and obtain a vrms. This may be described in terms of Newtonian external running x and t variables which have infinite resolution, but this vrms does not map to a physical state i.e to exp(i (mvrms) x) localized at x. Rather the various exp(ipx)’s which create vrms are the physical entities as may be seen by knocking a particle out of a bound state. The physical exp(ipx) momenta states have spatial invariance and so cannot be associated with a specific position in space. Only their superposition creates the notion of specific position in space, but then there is a distribution of p. This seems to be the basis for the x-p uncertainty principle. Thus we suggest that the particle of particle-wave duality is created through a mapping of a physical wave scenario to a continuous (infinite resolution) x-t scheme which in reality is an abstraction because each p,E free particle state has it sown internal clock-ruler i.e. 1/E and 1/p time and space units. Given that 1/E and 1/p have finite values the idea of dt and dx tending to 0 only makes sense as an abstraction which only holds in certain situations.

Nov 2, 20220 citations

Quantum-Mechanical Channel of Interactions between Macroscopic Systems

R. Sh. Sargsyan, G. G. Karamyana, Ashot S. Gevorkyan +1 more

The macroscopic experimental phenomena which cannot be explained in the frames of classical concepts are described. The attempt of qualitatively understanding of observed effects based on Bohm’s representation of Schrödinger equation for arbitrary system of interacting particles is presented.

AIP conference proceedingsJan 1, 20109 citations