Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Bulletin of the American Physical Society

Thermodynamics in an extended mean-field theory for the Bose-Hubbard model

Dario Hügel, Lode Pollet

Published Mar 3, 2015• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Mean-Field Theory for Extended Bose-Hubbard Model with Hard-Core Bosons

Nicolas Gheeraert, Shai M. Chester, Mathias May +2 more

Understanding complex systems•Dec 26, 2015•7 citations

Investigation of the Bose-Hubbard model using dynamical mean-field theory

Jaromir Panas

•Feb 24, 2017•0 citations

Thermodynamics of the attractive Hubbard model in dynamic Mean-Field Theory

M. Keller, Walter Metzner

Verhandlungen der Deutschen Physikalischen Gesellschaft•Jan 1, 2000•0 citations

Mean‐Field Theory of an Extended Hubbard Model

Elka Korutcheva

physica status solidi (b)•Oct 1, 1989•0 citations

Thermodynamics of the Bose-Hubbard model in a Bogoliubov+U theory

Dario Hügel, Lode Pollet

We derive the $\mathrm{Bogoliubov}+U$ formalism to study the thermodynamical properties of the Bose-Hubbard model. The framework can be viewed as the zero-frequency limit of bosonic dynamical mean-field theory (B-DMFT), but equally well as an extension of the mean-field decoupling approximation in which pair creation and annihilation of depleted particles is taken into account. The self-energy on the impurity site is treated variationally, minimizing the grand potential. The theory containing just three parameters that are determined self-consistently reproduces the $T=0$ phase diagrams of the three-dimensional and two-dimensional Bose-Hubbard model with an accuracy of $1%$ or better. The superfluid to normal transition at finite temperature is also reproduced well and only slightly less accurately than in B-DMFT.

arXiv:1501.07849•Physical Review B•Jun 22, 2015•6 citations

The inhomogeneous extended Bose‐Hubbard model: A mean‐field theory

Jamshid Moradi Kurdestany, R.V. Pai, Rahul Anil Pandit

Abstract We develop an inhomogeneous mean‐field theory for the extended Bose‐Hubbard model with a quadratic, confining potential. In the absence of this potential, our mean‐field theory yields the phase diagram of the homogeneous extended Bose‐Hubbard model. This phase diagram shows a superfluid (SF) phase and lobes of Mott‐insulator (MI), density‐wave (DW), and supersolid (SS) phases in the plane of the chemical potential µ and on‐site repulsion U; we present phase diagrams for representative values of V, the repulsive energy for bosons on nearest‐neighbor sites. We demonstrate that, when the confining potential is present, superfluid and density‐wave order parameters are nonuniform; in particular, we obtain, for a few representative values of parameters, spherical shells of SF, MI, DW, and SS phases. We explore the implications of our study for experiments on cold‐atom dipolar condensates in optical lattices in a confining potential.

arXiv:1201.6451•Annalen der Physik•Feb 2, 2012•20 citations
We derive the Bogoliubov+U\mathrm{Bogoliubov}+UBogoliubov+U formalism to study the thermodynamical properties of the Bose-Hubbard model. The framework can be viewed as the zero-frequency limit of bosonic dynamical mean-field theory (B-DMFT), but equally well as an extension of the mean-field decoupling approximation in which pair creation and annihilation of depleted particles is taken into account. The self-energy on the impurity site is treated variationally, minimizing the grand potential. The theory containing just three parameters that are determined self-consistently reproduces the T=0T=0T=0 phase diagrams of the three-dimensional and two-dimensional Bose-Hubbard model with an accuracy of 11%1 or better. The superfluid to normal transition at finite temperature is also reproduced well and only slightly less accurately than in B-DMFT.
Abstract We develop an inhomogeneous mean‐field theory for the extended Bose‐Hubbard model with a quadratic, confining potential. In the absence of this potential, our mean‐field theory yields the phase diagram of the homogeneous extended Bose‐Hubbard model. This phase diagram shows a superfluid (SF) phase and lobes of Mott‐insulator (MI), density‐wave (DW), and supersolid (SS) phases in the plane of the chemical potential µ and on‐site repulsion U; we present phase diagrams for representative values of V, the repulsive energy for bosons on nearest‐neighbor sites. We demonstrate that, when the confining potential is present, superfluid and density‐wave order parameters are nonuniform; in particular, we obtain, for a few representative values of parameters, spherical shells of SF, MI, DW, and SS phases. We explore the implications of our study for experiments on cold‐atom dipolar condensates in optical lattices in a confining potential.