Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

physica status solidi (b)

Mean‐Field Theory of an Extended Hubbard Model

Elka Korutcheva

Published Oct 1, 1989• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1002/pssb.2221550253

Related papers

Hubbard Model in Dynamical Mean-Field Theory

Vladimir I. Anisimov, Yu. A. Izyumov

Springer series in solid-state sciences•Jan 1, 2010•0 citations

Mean field theory for the N-orbital Hubbard model beyond the Hubbard I approximation

I. Sandalov, Börje Johansson

Physica B Condensed Matter•Feb 1, 1995•8 citations

Thermodynamics in an extended mean-field theory for the Bose-Hubbard model

Dario Hügel, Lode Pollet

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 3, 2015•0 citations

New mean field theories of the Hubbard model

H.R. Krishn Amurthy, Ciriyam Jayaprakash, Wolfgang Wenzel +1 more

Physica C Superconductivity•Dec 1, 1989•0 citations

The extended Hubbard model with attractive interactions

Erik G. C. P. van Loon, Mikhail I. Katsnelson

We discuss the phase diagram of the extended Hubbard model with both attractive and repulsive local and nonlocal interactions. The extended dynamical mean-field theory (EDMFT) and the dual boson method (DB) are compared. The latter contains additional nonlocal correlation effects that are not incorporated in EDMFT. We find that EDMFT and DB give almost identical results in the attractive V regime, where phase separation occurs. This is quite a difference with the previously studied repulsive V regime, where EDMFT and DB give very different phase boundaries for the checkerboard order phase, especially at small U .

arXiv:1709.06379•Journal of Physics Conference Series•Dec 1, 2018•20 citations

Dynamical Mean Field Study of the Extended Hubbard Model

A. Baldwin, Alexandru Macridin, Mark Jarrell +1 more

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 16, 2006•0 citations
We discuss the phase diagram of the extended Hubbard model with both attractive and repulsive local and nonlocal interactions. The extended dynamical mean-field theory (EDMFT) and the dual boson method (DB) are compared. The latter contains additional nonlocal correlation effects that are not incorporated in EDMFT. We find that EDMFT and DB give almost identical results in the attractive V regime, where phase separation occurs. This is quite a difference with the previously studied repulsive V regime, where EDMFT and DB give very different phase boundaries for the checkerboard order phase, especially at small U .