Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Bulletin of the American Physical Society

Atomic tunneling ionization in a photon picture

Yujun Wang, Brett D. Esry

Published Jun 10, 2015• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

A particle picture of ?tunneling? and the nature of ?photon?-matter interaction

V. J. Lee

Journal of Statistical Physics•Jun 1, 1973•1 citation

Tunnel ionization of highly excited atoms in a noncoherent laser radiation field

В. П. Крайнов, S. S. Todirashku

Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics•Oct 1, 1982•0 citations

FROM MULTIPHOTON TO TUNNEL IONIZATION

S. L. Chin

Advances in multi-photon processes and spectroscopy•Sep 1, 2004•53 citations

Tunneling time in attosecond experiment for hydrogen atom

Ossama Kullie

Tunneling and tunneling time are hot debated and very interesting issues because of their fundamental role in the quantum mechanics. The measurement of the tunneling time in today's attosecond and strong field (low-frequency) experiments, despite its controversial discussion offers a fruitful opportunity to understand the time measurement and the role of time in quantum mechanics. In previous work Kullie (2015 Phys. Rev. A 92 , 052118), we suggested a model and derived a simple relation to calculate the tunneling time, which showed a good agreement with the experimental result for He-atom. In the present work we analyze and discuss our model considering the experimental result for H-atom, which is obtained recently by Satya Sainadh et al (2017 arXiv: 1707.05445 ). In the tunneling region, we find that our model shows a good agreement with their experimental result (similar to the He-atom in our previous work), and with the accompanied time-dependent Schrödiger equation simulations. However, Sainadh et al use a different picture of the tunneling, in which tunneling time becomes an imaginary quantity. Whereas our model represents a real tunneling time picture, precisely a delay time with respect to the ionization time at the atomic field strength. Moreover, even though the above-threshold-ionization is beyond the tunneling regime, we still see that the actual ionization time is related to our model. However, crucial points arise and keep some questions open especially on the experimental side.

Journal of Physics Communications•May 24, 2018•7 citations

One- and two-photon ionization of model atoms

Giovanni P. Arrighini, Carla Guidotti, N. Durante

Il Nuovo Cimento D•Apr 1, 1986•10 citations

Atomic ionization driven by the quantized electromagnetic field in a Fock state

Igor A. Ivanov, Kyung Taec Kim

We consider ionization of an atom by the electromagnetic field in a Fock state $|N\ensuremath{\rangle}$: An eigenvector of the operator ${\stackrel{\ifmmode \hat{}\else \^{}\fi{}}{N}}_{\mathbit{k},\ensuremath{\lambda}}={\stackrel{\ifmmode \hat{}\else \^{}\fi{}}{a}}_{\mathbit{k},\ensuremath{\lambda}}^{\ifmmode\dagger\else\textdagger\fi{}}{\stackrel{\ifmmode \hat{}\else \^{}\fi{}}{a}}_{\mathbit{k},\ensuremath{\lambda}}$ of the number of photons in the mode $\mathbit{k},\ensuremath{\lambda}$. We treat the electromagnetic field in a quantized way, which allows us to obtain the photon picture of the strong field ionization. We obtain, in particular, probability distributions for the number of absorbed photons in the process of strong field ionization for atomic systems governed by short-range and Coulomb potentials.

Physical Review A•Aug 24, 2020•4 citations
Tunneling and tunneling time are hot debated and very interesting issues because of their fundamental role in the quantum mechanics. The measurement of the tunneling time in today's attosecond and strong field (low-frequency) experiments, despite its controversial discussion offers a fruitful opportunity to understand the time measurement and the role of time in quantum mechanics. In previous work Kullie (2015 Phys. Rev. A 92 , 052118), we suggested a model and derived a simple relation to calculate the tunneling time, which showed a good agreement with the experimental result for He-atom. In the present work we analyze and discuss our model considering the experimental result for H-atom, which is obtained recently by Satya Sainadh et al (2017 arXiv: 1707.05445 ). In the tunneling region, we find that our model shows a good agreement with their experimental result (similar to the He-atom in our previous work), and with the accompanied time-dependent Schrödiger equation simulations. However, Sainadh et al use a different picture of the tunneling, in which tunneling time becomes an imaginary quantity. Whereas our model represents a real tunneling time picture, precisely a delay time with respect to the ionization time at the atomic field strength. Moreover, even though the above-threshold-ionization is beyond the tunneling regime, we still see that the actual ionization time is related to our model. However, crucial points arise and keep some questions open especially on the experimental side.
We consider ionization of an atom by the electromagnetic field in a Fock state $|N\ensuremath{\rangle}$: An eigenvector of the operator ${\stackrel{\ifmmode \hat{}\else \^{}\fi{}}{N}}_{\mathbit{k},\ensuremath{\lambda}}={\stackrel{\ifmmode \hat{}\else \^{}\fi{}}{a}}_{\mathbit{k},\ensuremath{\lambda}}^{\ifmmode\dagger\else\textdagger\fi{}}{\stackrel{\ifmmode \hat{}\else \^{}\fi{}}{a}}_{\mathbit{k},\ensuremath{\lambda}}$ of the number of photons in the mode $\mathbit{k},\ensuremath{\lambda}$. We treat the electromagnetic field in a quantized way, which allows us to obtain the photon picture of the strong field ionization. We obtain, in particular, probability distributions for the number of absorbed photons in the process of strong field ionization for atomic systems governed by short-range and Coulomb potentials.