The dependence structure and the amplitude distribution of stationary random sequences are linked, with specification of one placing constraints on the other. Time-reversible processes can be Gaussian or non-Gaussian, but all Gaussian processes must be time reversible. We examine the thermodynamics of measurement, showing that while ‘‘information” can be extracted from a system without altering system entropy, mat measurement techniques irreversibly alter thermodynamic state with a consequent entropy increase. Because of the second law of thermodynamics, such entropy changes cannot be undone and measurements reflecting thermodynamic state cannot be time reversible. We conclude that physical measurements are not time reversible, implying that onZy non-time-reversible processes model physically relevant signals. Consequently, Gaussian processes would seem to be imprecise representations of physical measurements.
The dependence structure and the amplitude distribution of stationary random sequences are linked, with specification of one placing constraints on the other. Time-reversible processes can be Gaussian or non-Gaussian, but all Gaussian processes must be time reversible. We examine the thermodynamics of measurement, showing that while ‘‘information” can be extracted from a system without altering system entropy, mat measurement techniques irreversibly alter thermodynamic state with a consequent entropy increase. Because of the second law of thermodynamics, such entropy changes cannot be undone and measurements reflecting thermodynamic state cannot be time reversible. We conclude that physical measurements are not time reversible, implying that onZy non-time-reversible processes model physically relevant signals. Consequently, Gaussian processes would seem to be imprecise representations of physical measurements.
The second law of thermodynamics states that entropy increases (or does not change) by time in an isolated system. As microscopic physical laws are reversible, the origin of irreversibility is not straightforward. Although the outcome of a measurement on a pure quantum state is not fully predictable due to the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, quantum and finite entropy uncertainties are thought to be fundamentally different. We propose to calculate the predictability of measurements comprising both quantum and entropic uncertainties. We show that the unpredictability of measurements is identical to entropy in case of semiclassical statistical mechanics, and it increases by time in a pure entangled quantum state as a result of quantum measurement.
Abstract The entropy production rate is a key quantity in nonequilibrium thermodynamics of both classical and quantum processes. No universal theory of entropy production is available to date, which hinders progress toward its full grasping. By using a phase space-based approach, here we take the current framework for the assessment of thermodynamic irreversibility all the way to quantum regimes by characterizing entropy production—and its rate—resulting from the continuous monitoring of a Gaussian system. This allows us to formulate a sharpened second law of thermodynamics that accounts for the measurement back action and information gain from a continuously monitored system. We illustrate our framework in a series of physically relevant examples.
We consider the temporal evolution of an isolated system of particles from a non-equilibrium state of entropy S = S′ to the equilibrium state of maximum entropy S = S max, S′ ≤ S max. The application of usual density matrix theory to the temporal development of S leads us to the unexpected result P = dS/dt = 0. The entropy does not change in time. This result is valid in case of the equilibrium state. However it is wrong for a non-equilibrium state, which could not irreversibly change from S′ to S max by entropy production P > 0. This contradicts the second law of thermodynamics. The paradoxial result can be traced back to the Liouville theorem. To overcome this difficulty, we introduce the t–P space. The time t and the entropy production P are observables in quantum thermodynamics. They are defined by the eigenvalue equations t|t〉 = t|t〉 and P|P〉 = P|P〉. The operators t and P do not commute. We have a non-vanishing commutator, [t,P] = ik, and consequently a t–P uncertainty relation, ΔtΔP ≥ k/2. The Boltzmann constant k is characteristic of quantum thermodynamics and represents the atomic entropy unit. — The time evolution operator U(τ) = exp[−(i/k)τP] shifts the time t by τ, U(τ)|t〉 = |t + τ〉. The generator of τ is the operator P of entropy production. Then the eigenvector |P〉 is also an eigenket of U(t), and it follows with progressing time τ ≥ 0 that τP ≥ 0 and hence P = dS/dt ≥ 0. This is the second law of thermodynamics, which is correctly reproduced in quantum thermodynamics. — Exchanging −τ for +τ replaces the equations of forward time +τ by the equations of backward time −τ. Independent of the direction of the arrow of time, the entropy of the system always increases or remains constant in the limit of the equilibrium state, dS ≥ 0. This is characteristic of irreversibility, for the system does not return to its initial state on time reversal. — The t–P uncertainty relation allows to discuss the temporal evolution of the expectation value 〈P〉 of entropy production and the lifetime Δt of the transient states, the system passes through on approaching the equilibrium state. In case of a non-equilibrium state 〈P〉, ΔP, and Δt are finite. On approaching the equilibrium state, 〈P〉 and ΔP decrease, consequently Δt increases. Finally, in the case of equilibrium (eq), we have 〈P〉eq = 0, ΔP eq = 0, and Δt eq → ∞. The lifetime of the equilibrium state is unlimited, because the entropy production 〈P〉 and the uncertainty of entropy production ΔP exactly vanish. The temporal evolution of the system can be described by means of a phenomenological equation.
The act of measuring a system has profound consequences of dynamical and thermodynamic nature. In particular, the degree of irreversibility ensuing from a nonequilibrium process is strongly affected by measurements aimed at acquiring information on the state of a system of interest: the conditional and unconditional entropy production, which quantify the degree of irreversibility of the open system's dynamics, are related to each other by clearly interpreted informational quantities. Building on a recently proposed collisional model framework [G. T. Landi, M. Paternostro, and A. Belenchia, PRX Quantum 3, 010303 (2022)], we investigate the case of continuous-variable information carriers prepared in Gaussian states and undergoing Gaussian processes. We build up a toolbox that fully characterizes the thermodynamics of continuously measured nonequilibrium Gaussian systems and processes, illustrating how the instruments hereby introduced provide key insight into recent experiments on mesoscopic quantum systems [M. Rossi, L. Mancino, G. T. Landi, M. Paternostro, A. Schliesser, and A. Belenchia, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 080601 (2020)].
We examine the fundamental aspects of statistical mechanics, dividing the problem into a discussion purely about probability, which we analyse from a Bayesian standpoint. We argue that the existence of a unique maximising probability distribution {p(j∣K)} for states labelled by j given data K implies that the corresponding maximal value of the information entropy σ({(pj∣K)})=−∑j(pj∣K)ln(pj∣K) depends explicitly on the data at equilibrium and on the Hamiltonian of the system. As such, it is a direct measure of our uncertainty about the exact state of the body and can be identified with the traditional thermodynamic entropy. We consider the well known microcanonical, canonical and grand canonical methods and ensure that the fluctuations about mean values are generally minuscule for macroscopic systems before identifying these mean values with experimental observables and thereby connecting to many standard results from thermodynamics. Unexpectedly, we find that it is not generally possible for a quantum process to be both isentropic and reversibly adiabatic. This is in sharp contrast to traditional thermodynamics where it is assumed that isentropic, reversible adiabatic processes can be summoned up on demand and easily realised. By contrast, we find that linear relations between pressures Pj and energies Ej are necessary and sufficient conditions for a quasi-static and adiabatic change to be isentropic, but, of course, this relationship only holds for a few especially simple systems, such as the perfect gas, and is not generally true for more complicated systems. By considering the associated entropy increases up to second order in small volume changes we argue that the consequences are in practice negligible.
All the laws of physics are time-reversible. Time arrow emerges only when ensembles of classical particles are treated probabilistically, outside of physics laws, and the entropy and the second law of thermodynamics are introduced. In quantum physics, no mechanism for a time arrow has been proposed despite its intrinsic probabilistic nature. In consequence, one cannot explain why an electron in an excited state will "spontaneously" transition into a ground state as a photon is created and emitted, instead of continuing in its reversible unitary evolution. To address such phenomena, we introduce an entropy for quantum physics, which will conduce to the emergence of a time arrow. The entropy is a measure of randomness over the degrees of freedom of a quantum state. It is dimensionless; it is a relativistic scalar, it is invariant under coordinate transformation of position and momentum that maintain conjugate properties and under CPT transformations; and its minimum is positive due to the uncertainty principle. To excogitate why some quantum physical processes cannot take place even though they obey conservation laws, we partition the set of all evolutions of an initial state into four blocks, based on whether the entropy is (i) increasing but not a constant, (ii) decreasing but not a constant, (iii) a constant, (iv) oscillating. We propose a law that in quantum physics entropy (weakly) increases over time. Thus, evolutions in the set (ii) are disallowed, and evolutions in set (iv) are barred from completing an oscillation period by instantaneously transitioning to a new state. This law for quantum physics limits physical scenarios beyond conservation laws, providing causality reasoning by defining a time arrow.