© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

Terms Privacy Legal Notice

IEEE Transactions on Information Theory

Geometrical and performance analysis of GMD and Chase decoding algorithms

Eran Fishler, Ofer Amrani, Yair Be'ery

Published Jul 1, 1999• 10 citations

Abstract

The overall number of nearest neighbors in bounded distance decoding (BDD) algorithms is given by N/sub 0,eff/=N/sub 0/+N/sub BDD/. Where NBDD denotes the number of additional, non-codeword, neighbors that are generated during the (suboptimal) decoding process. We identify and enumerate the nearest neighbors associated with the original generalized minimum distance (GMD) and Chase (1972) decoding algorithms. After careful examination of the decision regions of these algorithms, we derive an approximated probability ratio between the error contribution of a noncodeword neighbor (one of N/sub BDD/ points) and a codeword nearest neighbor. For Chase algorithm 1 it is shown that the contribution to the error probability of a noncodeword nearest neighbor is a factor of 2/sup d-1/ less than the contribution of a codeword, while for Chase algorithm 2 the factor is 2/sup [d/2]-1/, d being the minimum Hamming distance of the code. For Chase algorithm 3 and GMD, a recursive procedure for calculating this ratio, which turns out to be nonexponential in d, is presented. This procedure can also be used for specifically identifying the error patterns associated with Chase algorithm 3 and GMD. Utilizing the probability ratio, we propose an improved approximated upper bound on the probability of error based on the union bound approach. Simulation results are given to demonstrate and support the analytical derivations.

DOI: 10.1109/18.771143

Related papers

Asymptotic optimality of the GMD and Chase decoding algorithms

Yuansheng Tang, Toru Fujiwara, Tadao Kasami

The generalized minimum distance (GMD) and Chase (1972) decoding algorithms are some of the most important suboptimum bounded distance decoding algorithms for binary linear block codes over an additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) channel. We compute the limitation of the ratio between the probability of decoding error for the GMD or any one of the Chase decoding algorithms and that of the maximum-likelihood (ML) decoding when the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) approaches infinity. If the minimum Hamming distance of the code is greater than 2, the limitation is shown to be equal to 1 and thus the GMD and Chase decoding algorithms are asymptotically optimum.

IEEE Transactions on Information Theory•Aug 1, 2002•9 citations

Error performance analysis for reliability-based decoding algorithms

M.P.C. Fossorier, S. Liu

The statistical approach proposed by D. Agrawal and A. Vardy (see IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, vol.46, pp.60-83, Jan. 2000) to evaluate the error performance of the generalized minimum distance (GMD) decoding is extended to other reliability based decoding algorithms for binary linear block codes, namely Chase-type, combined GMD and Chase-type, and ordered statistic decoding. In all cases, tighter and simpler bounds than previously proposed ones have been obtained with this approach.

IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT)•Nov 7, 2002•3 citations

Concatenated Codes

Ron M. Roth

In this chapter, we continue the discussion on concatenated codes, which was initiated in Section 5.4. The main message to be conveyed in this chapter is that by using concatenation, one can obtain codes with favorable asymptotic performance—in a sense to be quantified more precisely—while the complexity of constructing these codes and decoding them grows polynomially with the code length. We first present a decoding algorithm for concatenated codes, due to Forney. This algorithm, referred to as a generalized minimum distance (in short, GMD) decoder, corrects any error pattern whose Hamming weight is less than half the product of the minimum distances of the inner and outer codes (we recall that this product is a lower bound on the minimum distance of the respective concatenated code). A GMD decoder consists of a nearest-codeword decoder for the inner code, and a combined error–erasure decoder for the outer code. It then enumerates over a threshold value, marking the output of the inner decoder as erasure if that decoder returns an inner codeword whose Hamming distance from the respective received sub-word equals or exceeds that threshold. We show that under our assumption on the overall Hamming weight of the error word, there is at least one threshold for which the outer decoder recovers the correct codeword. If the outer code is taken as a GRS code, then a GMD decoder has an implementation with time complexity that is at most quadratic in the length of the concatenated code.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Feb 23, 2006•0 citations

Chase-type and GMD coset decodings

M.P.C. Fossorier, Shu Lin

In this letter, Chase decoding algorithms are generalized into a family of bounded distance decoding algorithms, so that the conventional Chase algorithm-2 and Chase algorithm-3 become the two extremes of this family. Consequently, more flexibility in the tradeoffs between error performance and decoding complexity is provided by this generalization, especially for codes with large minimum distance. Finally this approach is extended to decoding with erasures.

IEEE Transactions on Communications•Mar 1, 2000•31 citations

Generalized minimum-distance decoding in Euclidean-space: performance analysis

D. Agrawal, A. Vardy

Detailed geometric analysis of decoding regions for GMD decoding is presented. We show that GMD decoding regions are non-convex in essentially all cases of interest. We also prove that these regions are always bounded by hyperplane segments. For d-erasure GMD decoding, we establish the presence of a large number of bounding hyperplanes at distance /spl les/d+1. These results invalidate the estimates of performance derived from the union bound in the case of (multistage) GMD decoding. Alternative probabilistic estimates of, and upper bounds upon, the performance of GMD decoding are developed. Simulation results, for both low-dimensional and high-dimensional sphere packings, are in remarkably close agreement with our probabilistic approximations.

IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT)•Nov 22, 2002•1 citation

Error performance analysis for reliability-based decoding algorithms

M.P.C. Fossorier, Shu Lin

The statistical approach proposed by Agrawal and Vardy (see ibid., vol.46, no.1, p.60-83, 2000) to evaluate the error performance of the generalized minimum distance (GMD) decoding is extended to other reliability-based decoding algorithms for binary linear block codes, namely Chase (1972) type, combined GMD and Chase type, and order statistic decoding (OSD). In all cases, tighter and simpler bounds than those previously proposed have been obtained with this approach.

IEEE Transactions on Information Theory•Jan 1, 2002•62 citations

The overall number of nearest neighbors in bounded distance decoding (BDD) algorithms is given by N/sub 0,eff/=N/sub 0/+N/sub BDD/. Where NBDD denotes the number of additional, non-codeword, neighbors that are generated during the (suboptimal) decoding process. We identify and enumerate the nearest neighbors associated with the original generalized minimum distance (GMD) and Chase (1972) decoding algorithms. After careful examination of the decision regions of these algorithms, we derive an approximated probability ratio between the error contribution of a noncodeword neighbor (one of N/sub BDD/ points) and a codeword nearest neighbor. For Chase algorithm 1 it is shown that the contribution to the error probability of a noncodeword nearest neighbor is a factor of 2/sup d-1/ less than the contribution of a codeword, while for Chase algorithm 2 the factor is 2/sup [d/2]-1/, d being the minimum Hamming distance of the code. For Chase algorithm 3 and GMD, a recursive procedure for calculating this ratio, which turns out to be nonexponential in d, is presented. This procedure can also be used for specifically identifying the error patterns associated with Chase algorithm 3 and GMD. Utilizing the probability ratio, we propose an improved approximated upper bound on the probability of error based on the union bound approach. Simulation results are given to demonstrate and support the analytical derivations.

The generalized minimum distance (GMD) and Chase (1972) decoding algorithms are some of the most important suboptimum bounded distance decoding algorithms for binary linear block codes over an additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) channel. We compute the limitation of the ratio between the probability of decoding error for the GMD or any one of the Chase decoding algorithms and that of the maximum-likelihood (ML) decoding when the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) approaches infinity. If the minimum Hamming distance of the code is greater than 2, the limitation is shown to be equal to 1 and thus the GMD and Chase decoding algorithms are asymptotically optimum.

In this chapter, we continue the discussion on concatenated codes, which was initiated in Section 5.4. The main message to be conveyed in this chapter is that by using concatenation, one can obtain codes with favorable asymptotic performance—in a sense to be quantified more precisely—while the complexity of constructing these codes and decoding them grows polynomially with the code length. We first present a decoding algorithm for concatenated codes, due to Forney. This algorithm, referred to as a generalized minimum distance (in short, GMD) decoder, corrects any error pattern whose Hamming weight is less than half the product of the minimum distances of the inner and outer codes (we recall that this product is a lower bound on the minimum distance of the respective concatenated code). A GMD decoder consists of a nearest-codeword decoder for the inner code, and a combined error–erasure decoder for the outer code. It then enumerates over a threshold value, marking the output of the inner decoder as erasure if that decoder returns an inner codeword whose Hamming distance from the respective received sub-word equals or exceeds that threshold. We show that under our assumption on the overall Hamming weight of the error word, there is at least one threshold for which the outer decoder recovers the correct codeword. If the outer code is taken as a GRS code, then a GMD decoder has an implementation with time complexity that is at most quadratic in the length of the concatenated code.

Detailed geometric analysis of decoding regions for GMD decoding is presented. We show that GMD decoding regions are non-convex in essentially all cases of interest. We also prove that these regions are always bounded by hyperplane segments. For d-erasure GMD decoding, we establish the presence of a large number of bounding hyperplanes at distance /spl les/d+1. These results invalidate the estimates of performance derived from the union bound in the case of (multistage) GMD decoding. Alternative probabilistic estimates of, and upper bounds upon, the performance of GMD decoding are developed. Simulation results, for both low-dimensional and high-dimensional sphere packings, are in remarkably close agreement with our probabilistic approximations.