Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

American Journal of Physics

Why l(l+1) instead of l2?

Peter W. Milonni

Published Oct 1, 1990• 1 citation
Publisher

Abstract

By considering the allowed values of the z−component of the quantum mechanical angular momentum operator, a simple explanation is given for the term l(l+1). (AIP)
DOI
10.1119/1.16284

Related papers

A new derivation of quantum-mechanical angular momentum operator L2

P. D. Gupta

American Journal of Physics•Sep 1, 1976•0 citations

Simple and fast method for obtaining the angular momentum operators L x, L y, L z, and L2 in terms of spherical polar coordinates

Victor Namias

American Journal of Physics•Aug 1, 1977•0 citations

The meaning of 1 in l(l+1)

Gomez, E.

The magnitude of the angular momentum ($J^2$) in quantum mechanics is larger than expected from a classical model. We explain this deviation in terms of quantum fluctuations. A standard quantum mechanical calculation gives the correct interpretation of the components of the angular momentum in the vector model in terms of projections and fluctuations. We show that the addition of angular momentum in quantum mechanics gives results consistent with the classical intuition in this vector model.

arXiv:0803.3834•Mar 26, 2008•0 citations

Comment on the quantum nature of angular momentum using a coupled-boson representation

Ilki Kim, GERALD J. IAFRATE

A simple approach for understanding the quantum nature of angular momentum and its reduction to the classical limit is presented based on Schwinger's coupled-boson representation. This approach leads to a straightforward explanation of why the square of the angular momentum in quantum mechanics is given by j(j+1) instead of just j^2, where j is the angular momentum quantum number.

arXiv:quant-ph/0511259•Nov 29, 2005•0 citations

Eigenvalues j ( j + 1) of and the uncertainty principle

Donald H. Kobe

The eigenvalue j(j + 1) of the total angular momentum operator squared follows from the commutation relations for angular momentum. An alternative proof is given based on the uncertainty relation for the angular momentum components and . For expectation values in the state , the uncertainty relation holds as an equality and is used in the proof.

European Journal of Physics•Mar 1, 1998•0 citations

A Consideration of the Square of Angular Momentum: L^2 = L(L+1)

Ikunori Takata

•Oct 30, 2026•0 citations
The magnitude of the angular momentum (J2J^2J2) in quantum mechanics is larger than expected from a classical model. We explain this deviation in terms of quantum fluctuations. A standard quantum mechanical calculation gives the correct interpretation of the components of the angular momentum in the vector model in terms of projections and fluctuations. We show that the addition of angular momentum in quantum mechanics gives results consistent with the classical intuition in this vector model.