Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT)

Two approaches to the analysis of low-density parity-check codes

Kamil Sh. Zigangirov, Michael Lentmaier, Dmitri V. Truhachev

Published Jun 25, 2003• 2 citations
Publisher

Abstract

We overview two approaches to the analysis of low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes: selected code approach and ensemble approach. As examples of application of the methods we consider Gallager's homogeneous LDPC codes and Berrou-Glavieux-Thitimajshima (BGT) turbo-codes.
DOI
10.1109/isit.2002.1023301

Related papers

A REVIEW OF CONSTRUCTION METHODS FOR REGULAR LDPC CODES

Nisha Sarwade

Low-Density parity-check (LDPC) codes are one of the most powerful error correcting codes available today. Their Shannon capacity approaching performance and lower decoding complexity have made them the best choice for many wired and wireless applications. This paper gives an overview about LDPC codes and compares the Gallager’s method, Reed-Solomon based algebraic method and the Progressive edge growth (PEG) combinatorial method for the construction of regular LDPC codes.

•Jan 1, 2012•8 citations

Performance Evaluation Of Low Density Parity Check Codes

Othman Omran Khalifa, Sheroz Khan, Mohamad Zaid +1 more

This paper mainly about the study on one of the widely used error correcting codes that is Low parity check Codes (LDPC). In this paper, the Regular LDPC code has been discussed The LDPC codes explained in this paper is about the Regular Binary LDPC codes or the Gallager.

•Nov 24, 2007•15 citations

Capacity-Approaching Low-Density Parity-Check Codes

Pierre J. Garrigues

The class of low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes was introduced by Gallager in his thesis in 1961 [2]. Until the invention of turbo codes, they were largely neglected, but received a lot of interest lately, due to the possibility of designing LDPC codes within 0:0045 dB of the Shannon limit. We review in this project techniques used to analyze the performance of LDPC codes under a message-passing decoding algorithm, namely belief propagation (BP) [4][5]. This analysis gives us the tools to design good LDPC codes. We will flrst take the simpler example of transmission over the class of binary erasure channels (BEC). We will then see how it is possible to extend the results for the BEC to the much more general class of symmetric channels.

•Jan 1, 2005•0 citations

An Introduction to LDPC Codes

Bane Vasic, Erozan M. Kurtas

Low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes are a class of linear block codes which provide near-capacity performance on a large collection of data transmission and storage channels while simultaneously admitting implementable decoders. LDPC codes were first proposed by Gallager in his 1960 doctoral dissertation [1] and were scarcely considered in the 35 years that followed. One notable exception is the important work of Tanner in 1981 [2] in which Tanner generalized LDPC codes and introduced a graphical representation of LDPC codes, now called Tanner graphs. The study of LDPC codes was resurrected in the mid1990s with the work of MacKay, Luby, and others [3-5] who noticed, apparently independently of the work of Gallager, the advantages of linear block codes which possess sparse (low-density) parity-check matrices.

CRC Press eBooks•Nov 9, 2004•15 citations

Low-Density Parity-Check Codes

W.E. Ryan, Shu Lin

Low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes are a class of linear block codes with implementable decoders, which provide near-capacity performance on a large set of data-transmission and data-storage channels. LDPC codes were invented by Gallager in his 1960 doctoral dissertation and were mostly ignored during the 35 years that followed. One notable exception is the important work of Tanner in 1981, in which Tanner generalized LDPC codes and introduced a graphical representation of LDPC codes, now called a Tanner graph. The study of LDPC codes was resurrected in the mid 1990s with the work of MacKay, Luby, and others [3–6], who noticed, apparently independently of Gallager's work, the advantages of linear block codes with sparse (low-density) parity-check matrices. This chapter introduces LDPC codes and creates a foundation for further study of LDPC codes in later chapters. We start with the fundamental representations of LDPC codes via parity-check matrices and Tanner graphs. We then learn about the decoding advantages of linear codes that possess sparse parity-check matrices. We will see that this sparseness characteristic makes the code amenable to various iterative decoding algorithms, which in many instances provide near optimal performance. Gallager of course recognized the decoding advantages of such low-density parity-check codes and he proposed a decoding algorithm for the BI-AWGNC and a few others for the BSC. These algorithms have received much scrutiny in the past decade, and are still being studied.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Sep 17, 2009•6 citations

On the error-correcting capability of LDPC codes

Kamil Sh. Zigangirov, A. E. Pusane, D. K. Zigangirov +1 more

We consider the ensemble of low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes introduced by Gallager [1]. The Zyablov-Pinsker majority-logic iterative algorithm [2] for decoding LDPC codes is analyzed on the binary symmetric channel. An analytical lower bound on the error-correcting capability τ max that grows linearly in the code block length is obtained.

Problems of Information Transmission•Sep 1, 2008•11 citations
The class of low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes was introduced by Gallager in his thesis in 1961 [2]. Until the invention of turbo codes, they were largely neglected, but received a lot of interest lately, due to the possibility of designing LDPC codes within 0:0045 dB of the Shannon limit. We review in this project techniques used to analyze the performance of LDPC codes under a message-passing decoding algorithm, namely belief propagation (BP) [4][5]. This analysis gives us the tools to design good LDPC codes. We will flrst take the simpler example of transmission over the class of binary erasure channels (BEC). We will then see how it is possible to extend the results for the BEC to the much more general class of symmetric channels.
Low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes are a class of linear block codes which provide near-capacity performance on a large collection of data transmission and storage channels while simultaneously admitting implementable decoders. LDPC codes were first proposed by Gallager in his 1960 doctoral dissertation [1] and were scarcely considered in the 35 years that followed. One notable exception is the important work of Tanner in 1981 [2] in which Tanner generalized LDPC codes and introduced a graphical representation of LDPC codes, now called Tanner graphs. The study of LDPC codes was resurrected in the mid1990s with the work of MacKay, Luby, and others [3-5] who noticed, apparently independently of the work of Gallager, the advantages of linear block codes which possess sparse (low-density) parity-check matrices.
Low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes are a class of linear block codes with implementable decoders, which provide near-capacity performance on a large set of data-transmission and data-storage channels. LDPC codes were invented by Gallager in his 1960 doctoral dissertation and were mostly ignored during the 35 years that followed. One notable exception is the important work of Tanner in 1981, in which Tanner generalized LDPC codes and introduced a graphical representation of LDPC codes, now called a Tanner graph. The study of LDPC codes was resurrected in the mid 1990s with the work of MacKay, Luby, and others [3–6], who noticed, apparently independently of Gallager's work, the advantages of linear block codes with sparse (low-density) parity-check matrices. This chapter introduces LDPC codes and creates a foundation for further study of LDPC codes in later chapters. We start with the fundamental representations of LDPC codes via parity-check matrices and Tanner graphs. We then learn about the decoding advantages of linear codes that possess sparse parity-check matrices. We will see that this sparseness characteristic makes the code amenable to various iterative decoding algorithms, which in many instances provide near optimal performance. Gallager of course recognized the decoding advantages of such low-density parity-check codes and he proposed a decoding algorithm for the BI-AWGNC and a few others for the BSC. These algorithms have received much scrutiny in the past decade, and are still being studied.