Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Cambridge University Press eBooks

Low-Density Parity-Check Codes

W.E. Ryan, Shu Lin

Published Sep 17, 2009• 6 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes are a class of linear block codes with implementable decoders, which provide near-capacity performance on a large set of data-transmission and data-storage channels. LDPC codes were invented by Gallager in his 1960 doctoral dissertation and were mostly ignored during the 35 years that followed. One notable exception is the important work of Tanner in 1981, in which Tanner generalized LDPC codes and introduced a graphical representation of LDPC codes, now called a Tanner graph. The study of LDPC codes was resurrected in the mid 1990s with the work of MacKay, Luby, and others [3–6], who noticed, apparently independently of Gallager's work, the advantages of linear block codes with sparse (low-density) parity-check matrices. This chapter introduces LDPC codes and creates a foundation for further study of LDPC codes in later chapters. We start with the fundamental representations of LDPC codes via parity-check matrices and Tanner graphs. We then learn about the decoding advantages of linear codes that possess sparse parity-check matrices. We will see that this sparseness characteristic makes the code amenable to various iterative decoding algorithms, which in many instances provide near optimal performance. Gallager of course recognized the decoding advantages of such low-density parity-check codes and he proposed a decoding algorithm for the BI-AWGNC and a few others for the BSC. These algorithms have received much scrutiny in the past decade, and are still being studied.

DOI
10.1017/cbo9780511803253.006

Related papers

An Introduction to LDPC Codes

Bane Vasic, Erozan M. Kurtas

Low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes are a class of linear block codes which provide near-capacity performance on a large collection of data transmission and storage channels while simultaneously admitting implementable decoders. LDPC codes were first proposed by Gallager in his 1960 doctoral dissertation [1] and were scarcely considered in the 35 years that followed. One notable exception is the important work of Tanner in 1981 [2] in which Tanner generalized LDPC codes and introduced a graphical representation of LDPC codes, now called Tanner graphs. The study of LDPC codes was resurrected in the mid1990s with the work of MacKay, Luby, and others [3-5] who noticed, apparently independently of the work of Gallager, the advantages of linear block codes which possess sparse (low-density) parity-check matrices.

CRC Press eBooks•Nov 9, 2004•15 citations

Low-density parity-check codes

Sarah J. Johnson

Introduction In this chapter we introduce low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes, a class of error correction codes proposed by Gallager in his 1962 PhD thesis 12 years after error correction codes were first introduced by Hamming (published in 1950). Both Hamming codes and LDPC codes are block codes: the messages are broken up into blocks to be encoded at the transmitter and similarly decoded as separate blocks at the receiver. While Hamming codes are short and very structured with a known, fixed, error correction ability, LDPC codes are the opposite, usually long and often constructed pseudo-randomly with only a probabilistic notion of their expected error correction performance. The chapter begins by presenting parity bits as a means to detect and, when more than one is employed, to correct errors in digital data. Block error correction codes are described as a linear combination of parity-check equations and thus defined by their parity-check matrix representation. The graphical representation of codes by Tanner graphs is presented and the necessary graph theoretic concepts introduced. In Section 2.4 iterative decoding algorithms are introduced using a hard decision algorithm (bit flipping), so that the topic is developed first without reference to probability theory. Subsequently the sum–product decoding algorithm is presented. This chapter serves as a self-contained introduction to LDPC codes and their decoding. It is intended that the material presented here will enable the reader to implement LDPC encoders and iterative decoders.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Nov 19, 2009•5 citations

Performance evaluation of low-density parity-check codes

Paul Lauder

LDPC codes were first introduced by Robert Gallager in 1960. Due to the complexity of the codes and the limitations of the then rudimentary computer resources the codes were neglected as a viable form of FEC. LDPC codes were rediscovered by Tanner in 1981 when he generalized the codes and provided a means of graphical representation of LDPC codes. LDPC codes were again neglected until the work of MacKay et al in the mid to late 1990’s resurrected interest in the codes when they were discovered to out perform the then premium Turbo codes. This dissertation specifically describes the process of encoding and decoding LDPC codes and demonstrates the performance comparison between the various types of decoders in terms of bit error rate performance factors.

•Jan 1, 2008•3 citations

Construction of Cycle-free LDPC Codes

Fengfan Yang

The linear block code is called a binary Low-Density Parity-Check code if whose parity-check matrix is a sparse matrix. For the features of parity-check matrix, a LDPC code can be illustrated by a Tanner graph. Cycles, especially short cycles in the Tanner graph, lead to inefficient decoding and prevent the decoding algorithm from converging to the optimal decoding result. In this paper, a simple algorithm of constructing four-cycle-free regular A(n,d_v,d_c)LDPC codes, d_v3, is introduced. And we analyse the relationship between the performance and the cycle.

Journal of Yunnan University for Nationalites•Jan 1, 2005•0 citations

Design and Analysis of LDPC Convolutional Codes

Arvind Sridharan

Low-density parity-check (LDPC) block codes invented by Gallager in 1962 achieve exceptional error performance on a wide variety of communication channels. LDPC convolutional codes are the convolutional counterparts of LDPC block codes. This dissertation describes techniques for the design of LDPC convolutional codes, and analyzes their distance properties and iterative decoding convergence thresholds. The construction of time invariant LDPC convolutional codes by unwrapping the Tanner graph of algebraically constructed quasi-cyclic LDPC codes is described. The convolutional codes outperform the quasi-cyclic codes from which they are derived. The design of parity-check matrices for time invariant LDPC convolutional codes by the polynomial extension of a base matrix is proposed. An upper bound on free distance, proving that time invariant LDPC codes are not asymptotically good, is obtained. The Tanner graph is used to describe a pipelined message passing based iterative decoder for LDPC convolutional codes that outputs decoding results continuously. The performance of LDPC block and convolutional codes are compared for fixed decoding parameters like computational complexity, processor complexity, and decoding delay. In each case, the LDPC convolutional code performance is at least as good as that of LDPC block codes. An analog circuit to implement pipelined decoding of LDPC convolutional codes is proposed. The distance properties of a permutation matrix based (time varying) ensemble of (J,K) regular LDPC convolutional codes is investigated. It is proved that these codes (for J > 2) have free distance increasing linearly with constraint length, i.e., they are asymptotically good. Further, the asymptotic free distance to constraint length ratio for the convolutional codes is several times larger than the minimum distance to block length ratio for corresponding LDPC block codes. Iterative decoding of terminated LDPC convolutional codes, based on the ensemble mentioned above, is analyzed, assuming transmission over a binary erasure channel. The structured irregularity of the codes leads to significantly better convergence thresholds compared to corresponding LDPC block codes. At the calculated thresholds, both the bit and block error probability can be made arbitrarily small. The results obtained suggest that the thresholds approach capacity with increasing J.

•Sep 15, 2022•30 citations

Construction of Cycle-free LDPC Codes

OU Wei-hua

The linear block code is called a binary Low Density Parity Check code if its parity-check matrix is a sparse matrix.For the features of parity-check matrix,a LDPC code can be illustrated by a Tanner graph.Cycles,especially short cycles in the Tanner graph,which lead to inefficient decoding and prevent the decoding algorithm from converging to the optimal decoding result.In this paper,we demonstrate that a detection method of short cycle presents generation algorithm of check matrix without cycle 4 and simulates the check-matrix.

Journal of Changshu Institute of Technology•Jan 1, 2011•0 citations
Low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes are a class of linear block codes with implementable decoders, which provide near-capacity performance on a large set of data-transmission and data-storage channels. LDPC codes were invented by Gallager in his 1960 doctoral dissertation and were mostly ignored during the 35 years that followed. One notable exception is the important work of Tanner in 1981, in which Tanner generalized LDPC codes and introduced a graphical representation of LDPC codes, now called a Tanner graph. The study of LDPC codes was resurrected in the mid 1990s with the work of MacKay, Luby, and others [3–6], who noticed, apparently independently of Gallager's work, the advantages of linear block codes with sparse (low-density) parity-check matrices. This chapter introduces LDPC codes and creates a foundation for further study of LDPC codes in later chapters. We start with the fundamental representations of LDPC codes via parity-check matrices and Tanner graphs. We then learn about the decoding advantages of linear codes that possess sparse parity-check matrices. We will see that this sparseness characteristic makes the code amenable to various iterative decoding algorithms, which in many instances provide near optimal performance. Gallager of course recognized the decoding advantages of such low-density parity-check codes and he proposed a decoding algorithm for the BI-AWGNC and a few others for the BSC. These algorithms have received much scrutiny in the past decade, and are still being studied.
Low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes are a class of linear block codes which provide near-capacity performance on a large collection of data transmission and storage channels while simultaneously admitting implementable decoders. LDPC codes were first proposed by Gallager in his 1960 doctoral dissertation [1] and were scarcely considered in the 35 years that followed. One notable exception is the important work of Tanner in 1981 [2] in which Tanner generalized LDPC codes and introduced a graphical representation of LDPC codes, now called Tanner graphs. The study of LDPC codes was resurrected in the mid1990s with the work of MacKay, Luby, and others [3-5] who noticed, apparently independently of the work of Gallager, the advantages of linear block codes which possess sparse (low-density) parity-check matrices.
Introduction In this chapter we introduce low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes, a class of error correction codes proposed by Gallager in his 1962 PhD thesis 12 years after error correction codes were first introduced by Hamming (published in 1950). Both Hamming codes and LDPC codes are block codes: the messages are broken up into blocks to be encoded at the transmitter and similarly decoded as separate blocks at the receiver. While Hamming codes are short and very structured with a known, fixed, error correction ability, LDPC codes are the opposite, usually long and often constructed pseudo-randomly with only a probabilistic notion of their expected error correction performance. The chapter begins by presenting parity bits as a means to detect and, when more than one is employed, to correct errors in digital data. Block error correction codes are described as a linear combination of parity-check equations and thus defined by their parity-check matrix representation. The graphical representation of codes by Tanner graphs is presented and the necessary graph theoretic concepts introduced. In Section 2.4 iterative decoding algorithms are introduced using a hard decision algorithm (bit flipping), so that the topic is developed first without reference to probability theory. Subsequently the sum–product decoding algorithm is presented. This chapter serves as a self-contained introduction to LDPC codes and their decoding. It is intended that the material presented here will enable the reader to implement LDPC encoders and iterative decoders.
LDPC codes were first introduced by Robert Gallager in 1960. Due to the complexity of the codes and the limitations of the then rudimentary computer resources the codes were neglected as a viable form of FEC. LDPC codes were rediscovered by Tanner in 1981 when he generalized the codes and provided a means of graphical representation of LDPC codes. LDPC codes were again neglected until the work of MacKay et al in the mid to late 1990’s resurrected interest in the codes when they were discovered to out perform the then premium Turbo codes. This dissertation specifically describes the process of encoding and decoding LDPC codes and demonstrates the performance comparison between the various types of decoders in terms of bit error rate performance factors.
The linear block code is called a binary Low-Density Parity-Check code if whose parity-check matrix is a sparse matrix. For the features of parity-check matrix, a LDPC code can be illustrated by a Tanner graph. Cycles, especially short cycles in the Tanner graph, lead to inefficient decoding and prevent the decoding algorithm from converging to the optimal decoding result. In this paper, a simple algorithm of constructing four-cycle-free regular A(n,d_v,d_c)LDPC codes, d_v3, is introduced. And we analyse the relationship between the performance and the cycle.
Low-density parity-check (LDPC) block codes invented by Gallager in 1962 achieve exceptional error performance on a wide variety of communication channels. LDPC convolutional codes are the convolutional counterparts of LDPC block codes. This dissertation describes techniques for the design of LDPC convolutional codes, and analyzes their distance properties and iterative decoding convergence thresholds. The construction of time invariant LDPC convolutional codes by unwrapping the Tanner graph of algebraically constructed quasi-cyclic LDPC codes is described. The convolutional codes outperform the quasi-cyclic codes from which they are derived. The design of parity-check matrices for time invariant LDPC convolutional codes by the polynomial extension of a base matrix is proposed. An upper bound on free distance, proving that time invariant LDPC codes are not asymptotically good, is obtained. The Tanner graph is used to describe a pipelined message passing based iterative decoder for LDPC convolutional codes that outputs decoding results continuously. The performance of LDPC block and convolutional codes are compared for fixed decoding parameters like computational complexity, processor complexity, and decoding delay. In each case, the LDPC convolutional code performance is at least as good as that of LDPC block codes. An analog circuit to implement pipelined decoding of LDPC convolutional codes is proposed. The distance properties of a permutation matrix based (time varying) ensemble of (J,K) regular LDPC convolutional codes is investigated. It is proved that these codes (for J > 2) have free distance increasing linearly with constraint length, i.e., they are asymptotically good. Further, the asymptotic free distance to constraint length ratio for the convolutional codes is several times larger than the minimum distance to block length ratio for corresponding LDPC block codes. Iterative decoding of terminated LDPC convolutional codes, based on the ensemble mentioned above, is analyzed, assuming transmission over a binary erasure channel. The structured irregularity of the codes leads to significantly better convergence thresholds compared to corresponding LDPC block codes. At the calculated thresholds, both the bit and block error probability can be made arbitrarily small. The results obtained suggest that the thresholds approach capacity with increasing J.
The linear block code is called a binary Low Density Parity Check code if its parity-check matrix is a sparse matrix.For the features of parity-check matrix,a LDPC code can be illustrated by a Tanner graph.Cycles,especially short cycles in the Tanner graph,which lead to inefficient decoding and prevent the decoding algorithm from converging to the optimal decoding result.In this paper,we demonstrate that a detection method of short cycle presents generation algorithm of check matrix without cycle 4 and simulates the check-matrix.