Introduction In this chapter we introduce low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes, a class of error correction codes proposed by Gallager in his 1962 PhD thesis 12 years after error correction codes were first introduced by Hamming (published in 1950). Both Hamming codes and LDPC codes are block codes: the messages are broken up into blocks to be encoded at the transmitter and similarly decoded as separate blocks at the receiver. While Hamming codes are short and very structured with a known, fixed, error correction ability, LDPC codes are the opposite, usually long and often constructed pseudo-randomly with only a probabilistic notion of their expected error correction performance. The chapter begins by presenting parity bits as a means to detect and, when more than one is employed, to correct errors in digital data. Block error correction codes are described as a linear combination of parity-check equations and thus defined by their parity-check matrix representation. The graphical representation of codes by Tanner graphs is presented and the necessary graph theoretic concepts introduced. In Section 2.4 iterative decoding algorithms are introduced using a hard decision algorithm (bit flipping), so that the topic is developed first without reference to probability theory. Subsequently the sum–product decoding algorithm is presented. This chapter serves as a self-contained introduction to LDPC codes and their decoding. It is intended that the material presented here will enable the reader to implement LDPC encoders and iterative decoders.
Introduction In this chapter we introduce low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes, a class of error correction codes proposed by Gallager in his 1962 PhD thesis 12 years after error correction codes were first introduced by Hamming (published in 1950). Both Hamming codes and LDPC codes are block codes: the messages are broken up into blocks to be encoded at the transmitter and similarly decoded as separate blocks at the receiver. While Hamming codes are short and very structured with a known, fixed, error correction ability, LDPC codes are the opposite, usually long and often constructed pseudo-randomly with only a probabilistic notion of their expected error correction performance. The chapter begins by presenting parity bits as a means to detect and, when more than one is employed, to correct errors in digital data. Block error correction codes are described as a linear combination of parity-check equations and thus defined by their parity-check matrix representation. The graphical representation of codes by Tanner graphs is presented and the necessary graph theoretic concepts introduced. In Section 2.4 iterative decoding algorithms are introduced using a hard decision algorithm (bit flipping), so that the topic is developed first without reference to probability theory. Subsequently the sum–product decoding algorithm is presented. This chapter serves as a self-contained introduction to LDPC codes and their decoding. It is intended that the material presented here will enable the reader to implement LDPC encoders and iterative decoders.
Low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes are a class of linear block codes with implementable decoders, which provide near-capacity performance on a large set of data-transmission and data-storage channels. LDPC codes were invented by Gallager in his 1960 doctoral dissertation and were mostly ignored during the 35 years that followed. One notable exception is the important work of Tanner in 1981, in which Tanner generalized LDPC codes and introduced a graphical representation of LDPC codes, now called a Tanner graph. The study of LDPC codes was resurrected in the mid 1990s with the work of MacKay, Luby, and others [3–6], who noticed, apparently independently of Gallager's work, the advantages of linear block codes with sparse (low-density) parity-check matrices. This chapter introduces LDPC codes and creates a foundation for further study of LDPC codes in later chapters. We start with the fundamental representations of LDPC codes via parity-check matrices and Tanner graphs. We then learn about the decoding advantages of linear codes that possess sparse parity-check matrices. We will see that this sparseness characteristic makes the code amenable to various iterative decoding algorithms, which in many instances provide near optimal performance. Gallager of course recognized the decoding advantages of such low-density parity-check codes and he proposed a decoding algorithm for the BI-AWGNC and a few others for the BSC. These algorithms have received much scrutiny in the past decade, and are still being studied.
Low density parity checking codes (LDPC) are one of the most important issues in coding theory at present. LDPC-code are a type of linear-block LDPC-codes. Channel coding might be considered as the finest conversant and most potent components of cellular communications systems, that was employed for transmitting errors corrections imposed by noise, fading and interfering. LDPC-codes are advanced coding gain, i.e., new area in coding. the performances of LDPC-code are similar to the Shannon-limiting, this led to the usage of decoding in several applications in digital communications systems, like DVB-S2 and WLAN802.1..This paper aims to know what is LDPC,what its application and introduce encoding algorithms that gives rise to a linear encoding time and also show that the regular and irregular LDPC performance and also introduce different methods for decoding LDPC. I discuss in detail LDPC decoding algorithm: bit flipping algorithm, as a type from hard decision .belief propagation algorithm, sum product algorithm and minimum sum algorithm as examples from soft decision .I expect that at least some students or researchers involved in researching LDPC codes would find this paper helpful.
Low Density Parity Check (LDPC) codes are one of the block coding techniques that can approach the Shannon’s limit within a fraction of a decibel for high block lengths. In many digital communication systems, these codes have strong competitors of turbo codes for error control. LDPC codes performance depends on the excellent design of parity check matrix and many diverse research methods have been used by different study groups to evaluate the performance. Unlike many other classes of codes, LDPC codes are already equipped with a fast, probabilistic decoding algorithm. This makes LDPC codes not only attractive from a theoretical point of view, but also very suitable for practical applications. This paper throws hard decision and soft decision algorithm of LDPC. The hard decision algorithm contains Bit flipping algorithm and Soft decoding algorithm contains Sum product algorithm which is used to correct burst error. Sum Product algorithm is also called as belief propagation. Bit flipping and Sum Product algorithms are explained and can be implemented for the generated parity check matrix of (1016x508) for LDPC code with code rate 1/2.
Low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes are a subclass of linear block codes. These codes have parity-check matrices in which the ratio of the non-zero elements to all elements is low. This property is exploited in defining low complexity decoding algorithms. Low-density parity-check codes have good distance properties and error correction capability near Shannon limits. In this thesis, the sum-product and the bit-flip decoding algorithms for low-density parity-check codes are implemented on Intel Pentium M 1,86 GHz processor using the software called MATLAB. Simulations for the two decoding algorithms are made over additive white gaussian noise (AWGN) channel changing the code parameters like the information rate, the blocklength of the code and the column weight of the parity-check matrix. Performance comparison of the two decoding algorithms are made according to these simulation results. As expected, the sum-product algorithm, which is based on soft-decision decoding, outperforms the bit-flip algorithm, which depends on hard-decision decoding. Our simulations show that the performance of LDPC codes improves with increasing blocklength and number of iterations for both decoding algorithms. Since the sum-product algorithm has lower error-floor characteristics, increasing the number of iterations is more effective for the sum-product decoder compared to the bit-flip decoder. By having better BER performance for lower information rates, the bit-flip algorithm performs according to the expectations; however, the performance of the sum-product decoder deteriorates for information rates below 0.5 instead of improving. By irregular construction of LDPC codes, a performance improvement is observed especially for low SNR values.
Introduction The construction of binary low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes simply involves replacing a small number of the values in an all-zeros matrix by 1s in such a way that the rows and columns have the required degree distribution. In many cases, randomly allocating the entries in H will produce a reasonable LDPC code. However, the construction of H can affect the performance of the sum–product decoder, significantly so for some codes, and also the implementation complexity of the code. While there is no one recipe for a “good” LDPC code, there are a number of principles that inform the code designer. The first obvious decisions are which degree distribution to choose and how to construct the matrix with the chosen degrees, i.e. pseudo-randomly or with some sort of structure. Whichever construction is chosen, the features to consider include the girth of the Tanner graph and the minimum distance of the code. In this chapter we will discuss those properties of an LDPC code that affect its iterative decoding performance and then present the common construction methods used to produce codes with the preferred properties. Following common practice in the field we will call the selection of the degree distributions for an LDPC code code design and the methods to assign the locations in the parity-check matrix for the 1 entries code construction .
In 1948, Claude Shannon provided a sound mathematical foundation for communication, and proved the existence of good codes. Low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes are a family of error-correcting codes that achieve reliable performance (i.e., arbitrarily low probability of decoding error) near the Shannon-limit when decoded iteratively via very efficient graph-based message-passing decoders, the complexity of which grows only linearly in the block-length. Despite their tremendous success, LDPC codes lack a strong theoretical foundation and few explicit constructions of them are known that outperform their random counterparts. The first part of this thesis investigates how the structure of a graph representing an LDPC code affects the decoding performance. In particular, lower bounds on the minimum pseudocodeword weight, a key parameter in predicting iterative decoding performance, are obtained which link the performance of the code to the structural properties of its graph. One bound is a tree bound and is extended to generalized and p-ary LDPC codes. To this end, a suitable definition of pseudocodeword weight is derived for the p-ary symmetric channel. Moreover, the relationship between pseudocodeword weight distributions and different graph representations is examined. Bounds on the minimum pseudocodeword weight are also presented for several classes of expander codes based on the eigenvalues of the adjacency matrix of the Tanner graph. The second part of this thesis constructs LDPC codes having desirable properties. The first construction is combinatorial and uses permutations and mutually orthogonal Latin squares. One type results in the well-known projective-geometrybased LDPC codes. Another type yields a new family of codes having comparable parameters and pseudocodeword weights suitable for iterative decoding. The resulting performance of these codes is superior in comparison with that of comparable random LDPC codes, a feature attributed to the lack of low-weight bad pseudocodewords. For the second construction, unbalanced expander graphs are obtained by modifying the original zig-zag graph product to take bi-regular expander graphs as components, with suitable constraints on the degrees. Graphs resulting from the zig-zag and replacement product graphs are then used in the design of generalized LDPC codes having compact representation and pseudocodeword weights lower-bounded by the eigenvalue bounds.