© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

Terms Privacy Legal Notice

Physics Letters B

An EPR experiment testing the non-separability of the wave function

A. J. Apostolakis, E. Aslanides, Gerhard Backenstoss, P. Bargassa, O. Behnke, Angela Benelli, Vincent Bertin, F. Blanc, Philippe Bloch, P. Carlson, M Carroll, E. Cawley, G. Chardin, M.B. Chertok, A Cody, M. Déjardin, J. Derré, A. Ealet, Christos A. Eleftheriadis, R. Ferreira‐Marques, Wulf Fetscher, Maria Fidecaro, Andrej Filipcic, David J. Francis, J. R. Fry, Erwin Gabathuler, R. Gamet, H.-J. Gerber, A. Go, Claude Guyot, A. Haselden, P.J. Hayman, Frederic Henry-Couannier, R.W. Hollander, E. Hubert, Kerstin B. Jon-And, P.R. Kettle, C. Kochowski, P. Kokkas, Rob Kreuger, R. Le Gac, F. Leimgruber, I. Mandić, N. Manthos, G. Marel, M. Mikuž, James P. Miller, F. Montanet, A Muller, T. Nakada, B. Pagels, I. Papadopoulos, Panagiotis Pavlopoulos, A. J. P. L. Policarpo, G. Polivka, R. Rickenbach, B. L. Roberts, T. Ruf, M. Schäfer, Lukas A. Schaller, Thomas Schietinger, A Schopper, Ph. Schune, Ludwig Tauscher, C. Thibault, François Touchard, Christos Touramanis, Carel W.E. van Eijk, S. Vlachos, P. Weber, O. Wigger, M. W. Wolter, Ch. Yèche, Danilo Zavrtanik

Published Mar 1, 1998• 86 citations

DOI: 10.1016/s0370-2693(97)01545-1

Related papers

An EPR experiment testing the non-separability of the Ko anti Ko wave function

Cwe van Eijk, R.W. Hollander, Rob Kreuger

Physica B Condensed Matter•Jan 1, 1999•0 citations

EPR experiments without “collapse of the wavefunction”

Boris J. Kayser, Leo Stodolsky

Physics Letters B•Oct 1, 1995•31 citations

Is `entanglement' always entangled?

A F Kracklauer

Entanglement, including ``quantum entanglement,'' is a consequence of correlation between objects. When the objects are subunits of pairs which in turn are members of an ensemble described by a wave function, a correlation among the subunits induces the mysterious properties of ``cat-states.'' However, correlation between subsystems can be present from purely non-quantum sources, thereby entailing no unfathomable behavior. Such entanglement arises whenever the so-called ``qubit space'' is not afflicted with Heisenberg Uncertainty. It turns out that all optical experimental realizations of EPR's \emph{Gedanken} experiment in fact do not suffer Heisenberg Uncertainty. Examples will be analyzed and non-quantum models for some of these described. The consequences for experiments that were to test EPR's contention in the form of Bell's Theorem are drawn: \emph{valid tests of EPR's hypothesis have yet to be done.}

arXiv:quant-ph/0108057•Journal of Optics B Quantum and Semiclassical Optics•Apr 5, 2002•9 citations

Experimental tests of the properties of the quantum-mechanical wave function

Gino Tarozzi

Lettere al nuovo cimento della societa italiana di fisica/Lettere al nuovo cimento•Apr 1, 1985•13 citations

On the Wave System Theory of the EPR Experiment

Thomas B. Andrews

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1994•1 citation

Is "entanglement" always entangled?

Aloysius F. Kracklauer

Entanglement, including ``quantum entanglement,'' is a consequence of correlation between objects. When the objects are subunits of pairs which in turn are members of an ensemble described by a wave function, a correlation among the subunits induces the mysterious properties of ``cat-states.'' However, correlation between subsystems can be present from purely non-quantum sources, thereby entailing no unfathomable behavior. Such entanglement arises whenever the so-called ``qubit space'' is not afflicted with Heisenberg Uncertainty. It turns out that all optical experimental realizations of EPR's \\emph{Gedanken} experiment in fact do not suffer Heisenberg Uncertainty. Examples will be analyzed and non-quantum models for some of these described. The consequences for experiments that were to test EPR's contention in the form of Bell's Theorem are drawn: \\emph{valid tests of EPR's hypothesis have yet to be done.}

•Aug 13, 2001•14 citations

Entanglement, including ``quantum entanglement,'' is a consequence of correlation between objects. When the objects are subunits of pairs which in turn are members of an ensemble described by a wave function, a correlation among the subunits induces the mysterious properties of ``cat-states.'' However, correlation between subsystems can be present from purely non-quantum sources, thereby entailing no unfathomable behavior. Such entanglement arises whenever the so-called ``qubit space'' is not afflicted with Heisenberg Uncertainty. It turns out that all optical experimental realizations of EPR's \emph{Gedanken} experiment in fact do not suffer Heisenberg Uncertainty. Examples will be analyzed and non-quantum models for some of these described. The consequences for experiments that were to test EPR's contention in the form of Bell's Theorem are drawn: \emph{valid tests of EPR's hypothesis have yet to be done.}

Entanglement, including ``quantum entanglement,'' is a consequence of correlation between objects. When the objects are subunits of pairs which in turn are members of an ensemble described by a wave function, a correlation among the subunits induces the mysterious properties of ``cat-states.'' However, correlation between subsystems can be present from purely non-quantum sources, thereby entailing no unfathomable behavior. Such entanglement arises whenever the so-called ``qubit space'' is not afflicted with Heisenberg Uncertainty. It turns out that all optical experimental realizations of EPR's \\emph{Gedanken} experiment in fact do not suffer Heisenberg Uncertainty. Examples will be analyzed and non-quantum models for some of these described. The consequences for experiments that were to test EPR's contention in the form of Bell's Theorem are drawn: \\emph{valid tests of EPR's hypothesis have yet to be done.}