Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physica B Condensed Matter

An EPR experiment testing the non-separability of the Ko anti Ko wave function

Cwe van Eijk, R.W. Hollander, Rob Kreuger

Published Jan 1, 1999• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

An EPR experiment testing the non-separability of the wave function

A. J. Apostolakis, E. Aslanides, Gerhard Backenstoss +71 more

Physics Letters B•Mar 1, 1998•86 citations

EPR experiments without “collapse of the wavefunction”

Boris J. Kayser, Leo Stodolsky

Physics Letters B•Oct 1, 1995•31 citations

Is "entanglement" always entangled?

Aloysius F. Kracklauer

Entanglement, including ``quantum entanglement,'' is a consequence of correlation between objects. When the objects are subunits of pairs which in turn are members of an ensemble described by a wave function, a correlation among the subunits induces the mysterious properties of ``cat-states.'' However, correlation between subsystems can be present from purely non-quantum sources, thereby entailing no unfathomable behavior. Such entanglement arises whenever the so-called ``qubit space'' is not afflicted with Heisenberg Uncertainty. It turns out that all optical experimental realizations of EPR's \\emph{Gedanken} experiment in fact do not suffer Heisenberg Uncertainty. Examples will be analyzed and non-quantum models for some of these described. The consequences for experiments that were to test EPR's contention in the form of Bell's Theorem are drawn: \\emph{valid tests of EPR's hypothesis have yet to be done.}

•Aug 13, 2001•14 citations

Quantum theory, EPR experiments and locality

M. A. B. Whitaker, J.G. Dennison

Physics Letters A•Dec 1, 1988•4 citations

Is `entanglement' always entangled?

A F Kracklauer

Entanglement, including ``quantum entanglement,'' is a consequence of correlation between objects. When the objects are subunits of pairs which in turn are members of an ensemble described by a wave function, a correlation among the subunits induces the mysterious properties of ``cat-states.'' However, correlation between subsystems can be present from purely non-quantum sources, thereby entailing no unfathomable behavior. Such entanglement arises whenever the so-called ``qubit space'' is not afflicted with Heisenberg Uncertainty. It turns out that all optical experimental realizations of EPR's \emph{Gedanken} experiment in fact do not suffer Heisenberg Uncertainty. Examples will be analyzed and non-quantum models for some of these described. The consequences for experiments that were to test EPR's contention in the form of Bell's Theorem are drawn: \emph{valid tests of EPR's hypothesis have yet to be done.}

arXiv:quant-ph/0108057•Journal of Optics B Quantum and Semiclassical Optics•Apr 5, 2002•9 citations

Dissolving the EPR Paradox: Quantum Entanglement as Topological Non-Separability in a Discrete Substrate

Néstor E Ramos

Quantum entanglement remains the most contentious phenomenon in modern physics, famously described by Einstein as "spooky action at a distance." The standard interpretation relies on the instantaneous collapse of a non-local wave function, a mechanism that blatantly challenges the speed-of-light limit, or alternatively, relies on "superdeterminism", a conceptual patch suggesting all variables were correlated since the Big Bang. We demonstrate that under the framework of Computational Finitism, the EPR paradox is entirely dissolved. By modeling the universe as a discrete, Modulo-9 causal graph, we prove that entangled particles are not independent objects communicating across space. Instead, they are a single, indivisible topological knot projected onto two spatial coordinates. We present a deterministic simulation (The Finitism Entanglement Automaton) that achieves 100.0% perfect anti-correlation without any signal propagation, ontological randomness, or faster-than-light communication. Entanglement is not magic; it is the macroscopic observation of a non-separable algebraic identity.

•Oct 11, 2026•0 citations
Entanglement, including ``quantum entanglement,'' is a consequence of correlation between objects. When the objects are subunits of pairs which in turn are members of an ensemble described by a wave function, a correlation among the subunits induces the mysterious properties of ``cat-states.'' However, correlation between subsystems can be present from purely non-quantum sources, thereby entailing no unfathomable behavior. Such entanglement arises whenever the so-called ``qubit space'' is not afflicted with Heisenberg Uncertainty. It turns out that all optical experimental realizations of EPR's \\emph{Gedanken} experiment in fact do not suffer Heisenberg Uncertainty. Examples will be analyzed and non-quantum models for some of these described. The consequences for experiments that were to test EPR's contention in the form of Bell's Theorem are drawn: \\emph{valid tests of EPR's hypothesis have yet to be done.}
Entanglement, including ``quantum entanglement,'' is a consequence of correlation between objects. When the objects are subunits of pairs which in turn are members of an ensemble described by a wave function, a correlation among the subunits induces the mysterious properties of ``cat-states.'' However, correlation between subsystems can be present from purely non-quantum sources, thereby entailing no unfathomable behavior. Such entanglement arises whenever the so-called ``qubit space'' is not afflicted with Heisenberg Uncertainty. It turns out that all optical experimental realizations of EPR's \emph{Gedanken} experiment in fact do not suffer Heisenberg Uncertainty. Examples will be analyzed and non-quantum models for some of these described. The consequences for experiments that were to test EPR's contention in the form of Bell's Theorem are drawn: \emph{valid tests of EPR's hypothesis have yet to be done.}
Quantum entanglement remains the most contentious phenomenon in modern physics, famously described by Einstein as "spooky action at a distance." The standard interpretation relies on the instantaneous collapse of a non-local wave function, a mechanism that blatantly challenges the speed-of-light limit, or alternatively, relies on "superdeterminism", a conceptual patch suggesting all variables were correlated since the Big Bang. We demonstrate that under the framework of Computational Finitism, the EPR paradox is entirely dissolved. By modeling the universe as a discrete, Modulo-9 causal graph, we prove that entangled particles are not independent objects communicating across space. Instead, they are a single, indivisible topological knot projected onto two spatial coordinates. We present a deterministic simulation (The Finitism Entanglement Automaton) that achieves 100.0% perfect anti-correlation without any signal propagation, ontological randomness, or faster-than-light communication. Entanglement is not magic; it is the macroscopic observation of a non-separable algebraic identity.