Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

NeuroQuantology

Picture of the World As a Quantum Monadistic System

Teruaki Nakagomi

Published Sep 10, 2007• 2 citations
Publisher

Abstract

This is an introduction to quantum monadology. First, questions and observations are presented that would lead us to the idea of quantum monadology. Then, the world where we live is pictured as a monadistic system in a series of short but condensed statements without mathematics. You can find here the essence of quantum monadology.
DOI
10.14704/nq.2006.4.3.106

Related papers

Quantum monadology: A world model to interpret quantum mechanics and relativity

Teruaki Nakagomi

Open Systems & Information Dynamics•Oct 1, 1992•9 citations

The Quanturn Picture of the World

Lawrence Sklar

Abstract Quantum theory has presented scientists and philosophers of science with a series of perplexing questions. It seems to many that any attempt to comprehend a world described by quantum theory will require revision in our understanding of the nature of things far more radical than the revision in our understanding of the nature of space and time demanded by the theories of relativity. It has been claimed that to comprehend quantum theory we must revise our very understanding of such matters as the objective nature of reality and its independence from our perception of it, the nature of a complex system and its relation to its components, and the nature of causal and other kinds of determination in the world.

•Dec 17, 1992•0 citations

The effectiveness of mathematics in physics

Jane McDonnell

In this thesis I argue that many problems in the philosophy of science and mathematics (in particular, the unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics in physics) can only be addressed within a broader metaphysical framework which provides a coherent world view. I attempt to develop such a framework and draw out its consequences. The attempt is in two parts: first, I develop a speculative framework based on an analogy to set theory; then I combine elements of the framework with ideas from Leibnizian monadology and consistent histories quantum theory to introduce (what I call) quantum monadology. The two parts focus on different aspects of the problem and should be viewed as stages on the way to a final formulation. The inspiration for the thesis came from Plato’s Timaeus and Wigner’s comments on quantum mechanics. As it turned out, Leibniz’s Monadology became a third key source.

•Jan 1, 2017•0 citations

How the quantum universe became classical

J. J. Halliwell

This is an informal introduction to the ideas of decoherence and emergent classicality, including a simple account of the decoherent histories approach to quantum theory. It is aimed at undergraduates with a basic appreciation of quantum theory. The emphasis is on simple physical ideas and pictures.

arXiv:quant-ph/0501119•Contemporary Physics•Dec 22, 2004•31 citations

Building the Observer into the System: Toward a Realistic Description of Human Interaction with the World

Chris Fields

Human beings do not observe the world from the outside, but rather are fully embedded in it. The sciences, however, often give the observer both a “god’s eye” perspective and substantial a priori knowledge. Motivated by W. Ross Ashby’s statement, “the theory of the Black Box is merely the theory of real objects or systems, when close attention is given to the question, relating object and observer, about what information comes from the object, and how it is obtained” (Introduction to Cybernetics, 1956, p. 110), I develop here an alternate picture of the world as a black box to which the observer is coupled. Within this framework I prove purely-classical analogs of the “no-go” theorems of quantum theory. Focussing on the question of identifying macroscopic objects, such as laboratory apparatus or even other observers, I show that the standard quantum formalism of superposition is required to adequately represent the classical information that an observer can obtain. I relate these results to supporting considerations from evolutionary biology, cognitive and developmental psychology, and artificial intelligence.

arXiv:1411.3405•Systems•Oct 28, 2016•18 citations

The essence of quantum theory for computers

William C. Parke

. Quantum computers take advantage of interfering quantum alternatives in order to handle problems that might be too time consuming with algorithms based on classical logic. Developing quantum computers requires new ways of thinking beyond those in the familiar classical world. To help in this thinking, we give a description of the foundational ideas that hold in all of our successful physical models, including quantum theory. Our emphasis will be on the proper interpretation of our theories, and not just their statements. Our tact will be to build on the concept of information, which lies central to the operation of not just computers, but the Universe. For application to quantum computing, the essence of quantum theory is given, together with special precautions and limitations. Introduction. Having a grasp on the ideas behind a theory helps to apply it correctly, to understand its limitations, and to generate new ideas. Getting a firm hold on quantum theory is not an easy task, because our experiences and even our genetic predispositions have been developed in a world in which quantum effects are largely washed out. Remarkably, our predilection for finding logic behind the behavior of what we observe, including that of electrons and atoms, has led us to quantum theory, a description of nature that is hard for us to conceptualize, but is logical, accurate, and explains a wide variety of phenomena with only a few statements and input. As background to quantum theory and quantum computing, an attempt is made here to give the primitive notions and essential observations that underlie current physical theories, so that foundational ideas are explicit, and a common language is established. In our description, information storage and transfer is made central. A short description of quantum theory follows, and then applied to quantum computing, focusing on what the theory says, and particularly does not say, in areas where conceptual difficulties have arisen. Physical theory and reality. A physical theory is a logical model capable of making predictions of what we observe. It is judged by its accuracy in matching measurements, and by its economy, i.e. whether the proposed theory has only a few relationships and input data needed for its ability to explain observations over a wide realm.

arXiv:1409.2790•Cambridge University Press eBooks•Feb 26, 2016•0 citations
Abstract Quantum theory has presented scientists and philosophers of science with a series of perplexing questions. It seems to many that any attempt to comprehend a world described by quantum theory will require revision in our understanding of the nature of things far more radical than the revision in our understanding of the nature of space and time demanded by the theories of relativity. It has been claimed that to comprehend quantum theory we must revise our very understanding of such matters as the objective nature of reality and its independence from our perception of it, the nature of a complex system and its relation to its components, and the nature of causal and other kinds of determination in the world.
In this thesis I argue that many problems in the philosophy of science and mathematics (in particular, the unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics in physics) can only be addressed within a broader metaphysical framework which provides a coherent world view. I attempt to develop such a framework and draw out its consequences. The attempt is in two parts: first, I develop a speculative framework based on an analogy to set theory; then I combine elements of the framework with ideas from Leibnizian monadology and consistent histories quantum theory to introduce (what I call) quantum monadology. The two parts focus on different aspects of the problem and should be viewed as stages on the way to a final formulation. The inspiration for the thesis came from Plato’s Timaeus and Wigner’s comments on quantum mechanics. As it turned out, Leibniz’s Monadology became a third key source.
Human beings do not observe the world from the outside, but rather are fully embedded in it. The sciences, however, often give the observer both a “god’s eye” perspective and substantial a priori knowledge. Motivated by W. Ross Ashby’s statement, “the theory of the Black Box is merely the theory of real objects or systems, when close attention is given to the question, relating object and observer, about what information comes from the object, and how it is obtained” (Introduction to Cybernetics, 1956, p. 110), I develop here an alternate picture of the world as a black box to which the observer is coupled. Within this framework I prove purely-classical analogs of the “no-go” theorems of quantum theory. Focussing on the question of identifying macroscopic objects, such as laboratory apparatus or even other observers, I show that the standard quantum formalism of superposition is required to adequately represent the classical information that an observer can obtain. I relate these results to supporting considerations from evolutionary biology, cognitive and developmental psychology, and artificial intelligence.
. Quantum computers take advantage of interfering quantum alternatives in order to handle problems that might be too time consuming with algorithms based on classical logic. Developing quantum computers requires new ways of thinking beyond those in the familiar classical world. To help in this thinking, we give a description of the foundational ideas that hold in all of our successful physical models, including quantum theory. Our emphasis will be on the proper interpretation of our theories, and not just their statements. Our tact will be to build on the concept of information, which lies central to the operation of not just computers, but the Universe. For application to quantum computing, the essence of quantum theory is given, together with special precautions and limitations. Introduction. Having a grasp on the ideas behind a theory helps to apply it correctly, to understand its limitations, and to generate new ideas. Getting a firm hold on quantum theory is not an easy task, because our experiences and even our genetic predispositions have been developed in a world in which quantum effects are largely washed out. Remarkably, our predilection for finding logic behind the behavior of what we observe, including that of electrons and atoms, has led us to quantum theory, a description of nature that is hard for us to conceptualize, but is logical, accurate, and explains a wide variety of phenomena with only a few statements and input. As background to quantum theory and quantum computing, an attempt is made here to give the primitive notions and essential observations that underlie current physical theories, so that foundational ideas are explicit, and a common language is established. In our description, information storage and transfer is made central. A short description of quantum theory follows, and then applied to quantum computing, focusing on what the theory says, and particularly does not say, in areas where conceptual difficulties have arisen. Physical theory and reality. A physical theory is a logical model capable of making predictions of what we observe. It is judged by its accuracy in matching measurements, and by its economy, i.e. whether the proposed theory has only a few relationships and input data needed for its ability to explain observations over a wide realm.