Physics Letters A

Reply to Comment on: “On the ‘standard’ quantum-mechanical approach to times of arrival” [Phys. Lett. A 313 (2003) 498]

C. Richard Leavens

Published Aug 11, 2005• 16 citations

DOI: 10.1016/j.physleta.2005.08.004

Related papers

Reply to the Comment on ‘The correspondence between quantum and classical mechanics: An experimental demonstration of the smooth transition between the two regimes’ [Chem. Phys. Lett. 402 (2005) 519]

Anthony J. Horsewill

Chemical Physics LettersNov 29, 20064 citations

Comment on: “On the standard quantum-mechanical approach to times of arrival”

I. L. Egusquiza, Juan Gonzalo Muga, B. Navarro +1 more

Physics Letters AJun 21, 200317 citations

Reply to “Comment on ‘Contextuality within quantum mechanics manifested in subensemble mean values’ [Phys. Lett. A 373 (2009) 3430]” [Phys. Lett. A 374 (2010) 1397]

A. K. Pan, Dipankar Home

arXiv:1002.3687Physics Letters AJan 7, 20100 citations

On the “standard” quantum mechanical approach to times of arrival

C. Richard Leavens

Physics Letters AOct 1, 200235 citations

Reply to Comment on "Superradiant Phase Transitions and the Standard Description of Circuit QED"

Oliver Viehmann, Jan von Delft, Florian Marquardt

A Reply to the Comment by C. Ciuti and P. Nataf [arXiv:1112.0986v1] on our Letter "Superradiant Phase Transitions and the Standard Description of Circuit QED" [Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 113602 (2011)].

arXiv:1202.2916Feb 14, 20123 citations

Reply to Comment on 'The quantum mechanical tunnelling time problem-revisited'

David Lowe, Stephen P. Collins

Journal of Physics C Solid State PhysicsDec 30, 19888 citations