Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1202.2916

Reply to Comment on "Superradiant Phase Transitions and the Standard Description of Circuit QED"

Oliver Viehmann, Jan von Delft, Florian Marquardt

Published Feb 14, 2012• 3 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

A Reply to the Comment by C. Ciuti and P. Nataf [arXiv:1112.0986v1] on our Letter "Superradiant Phase Transitions and the Standard Description of Circuit QED" [Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 113602 (2011)].
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1202.2916

Related papers

Comment on “Superradiant Phase Transitions and the Standard Description of Circuit QED”

Cristiano Ciuti, Pierre Nataf

A Comment on the Letter by O. Viehmann, J. von Delft, and F. Marquardt [Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 107}, 113602 (2011)].

arXiv:1112.0986•Physical Review Letters•Oct 23, 2012•43 citations

Comment on “Electromagnetic Wave Dynamics in Matter-Wave Superradiant Scattering”

Wolfgang Ketterle

A Comment on the Letter by L. Deng, M. G. Payne, and E. W. Hagley, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 050402 (2010). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.

Physical Review Letters•Mar 15, 2011•6 citations

Reply to Comment on "Contextuality in bosonic bunching"

Paweł Kurzyński, Akihito Soeda, Jayne E. Thompson +1 more

This is a reply to arXiv:1409.7513 [Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 138901 (2014)].

arXiv:1409.8025•Sep 29, 2014•0 citations

Reply to Comment on "Space-Time Crystals of Trapped Ions"

Tongcang Li, Zhexuan Gong, Zhang‐qi Yin +5 more

This is a reply to the comment from Patrick Bruno (arXiv:1211.4792) on our paper (Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 163001 (2012)).

arXiv:1212.6959•Dec 31, 2012•3 citations

Reply to “Comment on “Role of matter interactions in superradiant phenomena””

J. P. Mendonça, K. Jachymski, Y. Wang

Physical Review Letters•Oct 26, 2026•0 citations

Superradiant Phase Transitions and the Standard Description of Circuit QED

Oliver Viehmann, Jan von Delft, Florian Marquardt

We investigate the equilibrium behavior of a superconducting circuit QED system containing a large number of artificial atoms. It is shown that the currently accepted standard description of circuit QED via an effective model fails in an important aspect: it predicts the possibility of a superradiant phase transition, even though a full microscopic treatment reveals that a no-go theorem for such phase transitions known from cavity QED applies to circuit QED systems as well. We generalize the no-go theorem to the case of (artificial) atoms with many energy levels and thus make it more applicable for realistic cavity or circuit QED systems.

arXiv:1103.4639•Physical Review Letters•Sep 8, 2011•200 citations
We investigate the equilibrium behavior of a superconducting circuit QED system containing a large number of artificial atoms. It is shown that the currently accepted standard description of circuit QED via an effective model fails in an important aspect: it predicts the possibility of a superradiant phase transition, even though a full microscopic treatment reveals that a no-go theorem for such phase transitions known from cavity QED applies to circuit QED systems as well. We generalize the no-go theorem to the case of (artificial) atoms with many energy levels and thus make it more applicable for realistic cavity or circuit QED systems.