© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

Terms Privacy Legal Notice

Physics Letters A

Comment on: “On the standard quantum-mechanical approach to times of arrival”

I. L. Egusquiza, Juan Gonzalo Muga, B. Navarro, A. Ruschhaupt

Published Jun 21, 2003• 17 citations

DOI: 10.1016/s0375-9601(03)00851-x

Related papers

Reply to Comment on: “On the ‘standard’ quantum-mechanical approach to times of arrival” [Phys. Lett. A 313 (2003) 498]

C. Richard Leavens

Physics Letters A•Aug 11, 2005•16 citations

On the “standard” quantum mechanical approach to times of arrival

C. Richard Leavens

Physics Letters A•Oct 1, 2002•35 citations

“Standard” Quantum Mechanical Approach to Times of Arrival

I. L. Egusquiza, Juan Gonzalo Muga, Andrés D. Baute

Springer eBooks•Aug 3, 2007•6 citations

“Standard” Quantum–Mechanical Approach to Times of Arrival

I. L. Egusquiza, Juan Gonzalo Muga, Andrés D. Baute

Springer eBooks•Nov 29, 2007•3 citations

Comment on “Arrival time in quantum mechanics” and “Time of arrival in quantum mechanics”

Jerzy Kijowski

Contrary to claims contained in papers by Grot, Rovelli, and Tate [Phys. Rev. A 54, 4676 1996)] and Delgado and Muga [Phys. Rev. A 56, 3425 (1997)], the ``time operator,'' which I have constructed [Rep. Math. Phys. 6, 361 (1974)] in an axiomatic way, is a self-adjoint operator existing in a usual Hilbert space of (nonrelativistic or relativistic) quantum mechanics.

Physical Review A•Jan 1, 1999•45 citations

Comment on "TIME OPERATOR": THE CHALLENGE PERSISTS

Jerzy Kijowski, Centrum Fizyki, Teoretycznej Pan

The criticism formulated by Mielnik and Torres-Vega in their paper, does not apply to my derivation of the time of arrival in Quantum Mechanics but to our present understanding of the quantum measurement theory.

•Jan 1, 2005•0 citations