Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Does quantum time have a preferred direction

Bryan Wilson Roberts

Published Jan 1, 2011• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Abstract

Abstract. This paper states and proves a precise sense in which, if all the mea-surable properties of an ordinary quantum mechanical system are ultimately deriv-able from position, then time in quantum mechanics can have no preferred direc-tion. In particular, I show that when the position observable forms a complete set of commuting observables, Galilei invariant quantum mechanics is guaranteed to be time reversal invariant. 1.

Related papers

Time, symmetry and structure: a study in the foundations of quantum theory

Bryan Wilson Roberts

This dissertation is about the sense in which the laws of quantum theory distinguish between the past and the future. I begin with an account of what it means for quantum theory to make such a distinction, by providing a novel derivation of the meaning of "time reversal." I then show that if Galilei invariant quantum theory does distinguish a preferred direction in time, then this has consequences for the ontology of the theory. In particular, it requires matter to admit "internal" degrees of freedom, in that the position observable generates a maximal abelian algebra. I proceed to show that this is not a purely quantum phenomenon, but can be expressed in classical mechanics as well. I then illustrate three routes for generating quantum systems that distinguish a preferred temporal direction in this way.

•Oct 2, 2012•9 citations

Is Time ‘Handed’ in a Quantum World?

Craig Callender

In a classical mechanical world, the fundamental laws of nature are reversible. The laws of nature treat the past and future as mirror images of each other. Temporally asymmetric phenomena are ultimately said to arise from initial conditions. But are the laws of nature also reversible in a quantum world? This paper argues that they are not, that time in a quantum world prefers a particular ‘hand’ or ordering. I argue, first, that the probabilistic algorithm used in the theory picks out a preferred direction of time for almost all interpretations of the theory, and second, that contrary to the received wisdom the Schrödinger evolution is also irreversible. The status of Wigner reversal invariance is then discussed. I conclude that the quantum world is fundamentally irreversible, but manages to appear (thanks to Wigner reversal invariance) reversible at the classical level.

Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (Hardback)•Jun 1, 2000•42 citations

Simultaneity and Time Reversal in Quantum Mechanics in Relation to Proper Time

Salim Yasmineh

In Newtonian physics, the equation of motion is invariant when the direction of time (t→−t) is flipped. However, in quantum physics, flipping the direction of time changes the sign of the Schrödinger equation. An anti-unitary operator is needed to restore time reversal in quantum physics, but this is at the cost of not having a consistent definition of time reversal applicable to all fundamental theories. On the other hand, a quantum system composed of a pair of entangled particles behaves in such a manner that when the state of one particle is measured, the second particle ‘simultaneously’ acquires a determinate state. A notion of absolute simultaneity seems to be inferred by quantum mechanics, even though it is forbidden by the postulates of relativity. We aim to point out that the above two problems can be overcome if the wavefunction is defined with respect to proper time, which in fact is the real physical time instead of ordinary time.

Quantum Reports•Sep 8, 2022•0 citations

No time asymmetry from quantum mechanics

Don Nelson Page

With CPT-invariant initial conditions that commute with CPT-invariant final conditions, the respective probabilities (when defined) of a set of histories and its CPT reverse are equal, giving a CPT-symmetric universe. This leads me to question whether the asymmetry of the Gell-Mann--Hartle decoherence functional for ordinary quantum mechanics should be interpreted as an asymmetry of time.

arXiv:gr-qc/9304027•Physical Review Letters•Jun 28, 1993•12 citations

Time Reversal Invariance in Quantum Mechanics

Reza Moulavi Ardakani

Symmetries have a crucial role in today's physics. In this thesis, we are mostly concerned with time reversal invariance (T-symmetry). A physical system is time reversal invariant if its underlying laws are not sensitive to the direction of time. There are various accounts of time reversal transformation resulting in different views on whether or not a given theory in physics is time reversal invariant. With a focus on quantum mechanics, I describe the standard account of time reversal and compare it with my alternative account, arguing why it deserves serious attention. Then, I review three known ways to T-violation in quantum mechanics, and explain two unique experiments made to detect it in the neutral K and B mesons.

arXiv:1802.10169•Feb 16, 2018•1 citation

Lorentz-covariant quantum mechanics and preferred frame

Paweł Caban, Jakub Rembieliński

In this paper the relativistic quantum mechanics (QM) is considered in the framework of the nonstandard synchronization scheme, which preserves the Poincar\'e covariance but (at least formally) distinguishes an inertial frame. This enables one to avoid the problem with a strong formulation of local causality related to the breaking of Bell's inequalities in QM. Our analysis has been focused mainly on the problem of the existence of a proper position operator for massive particles. We have proved that in our framework such an operator exists for particles with arbitrary spin. This operator is Hermitian and covariant, it has commuting components, and its eigenvectors (localized states) are covariant too. We have found an explicit form of the position operator and demonstrated that it coincides with the Newton-Wigner one in the preferred frame. We have also defined a covariant spin operator and constructed an invariant spin squared operator. Moreover, full algebra of observables consisting of position, four-momentum, and spin operators is manifestly Poincar\'e covariant in this framework. Our results support expectations of other authors [J. S. Bell, in Quantum Gravity, edited by C. J. Isham, R. Penrose, and D. W. Sciama (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1981), p. 611; P. H. Eberhard, Nuovo Cimento B 46, 392 (1978)] that a consistent formulation of quantum mechanics demands the existence of a preferred frame.

arXiv:quant-ph/9808013•Physical Review A•Jun 1, 1999•46 citations
Abstract. This paper states and proves a precise sense in which, if all the mea-surable properties of an ordinary quantum mechanical system are ultimately deriv-able from position, then time in quantum mechanics can have no preferred direc-tion. In particular, I show that when the position observable forms a complete set of commuting observables, Galilei invariant quantum mechanics is guaranteed to be time reversal invariant. 1.
This dissertation is about the sense in which the laws of quantum theory distinguish between the past and the future. I begin with an account of what it means for quantum theory to make such a distinction, by providing a novel derivation of the meaning of "time reversal." I then show that if Galilei invariant quantum theory does distinguish a preferred direction in time, then this has consequences for the ontology of the theory. In particular, it requires matter to admit "internal" degrees of freedom, in that the position observable generates a maximal abelian algebra. I proceed to show that this is not a purely quantum phenomenon, but can be expressed in classical mechanics as well. I then illustrate three routes for generating quantum systems that distinguish a preferred temporal direction in this way.
In a classical mechanical world, the fundamental laws of nature are reversible. The laws of nature treat the past and future as mirror images of each other. Temporally asymmetric phenomena are ultimately said to arise from initial conditions. But are the laws of nature also reversible in a quantum world? This paper argues that they are not, that time in a quantum world prefers a particular ‘hand’ or ordering. I argue, first, that the probabilistic algorithm used in the theory picks out a preferred direction of time for almost all interpretations of the theory, and second, that contrary to the received wisdom the Schrödinger evolution is also irreversible. The status of Wigner reversal invariance is then discussed. I conclude that the quantum world is fundamentally irreversible, but manages to appear (thanks to Wigner reversal invariance) reversible at the classical level.
In Newtonian physics, the equation of motion is invariant when the direction of time (t→−t) is flipped. However, in quantum physics, flipping the direction of time changes the sign of the Schrödinger equation. An anti-unitary operator is needed to restore time reversal in quantum physics, but this is at the cost of not having a consistent definition of time reversal applicable to all fundamental theories. On the other hand, a quantum system composed of a pair of entangled particles behaves in such a manner that when the state of one particle is measured, the second particle ‘simultaneously’ acquires a determinate state. A notion of absolute simultaneity seems to be inferred by quantum mechanics, even though it is forbidden by the postulates of relativity. We aim to point out that the above two problems can be overcome if the wavefunction is defined with respect to proper time, which in fact is the real physical time instead of ordinary time.
Symmetries have a crucial role in today's physics. In this thesis, we are mostly concerned with time reversal invariance (T-symmetry). A physical system is time reversal invariant if its underlying laws are not sensitive to the direction of time. There are various accounts of time reversal transformation resulting in different views on whether or not a given theory in physics is time reversal invariant. With a focus on quantum mechanics, I describe the standard account of time reversal and compare it with my alternative account, arguing why it deserves serious attention. Then, I review three known ways to T-violation in quantum mechanics, and explain two unique experiments made to detect it in the neutral K and B mesons.
In this paper the relativistic quantum mechanics (QM) is considered in the framework of the nonstandard synchronization scheme, which preserves the Poincar\'e covariance but (at least formally) distinguishes an inertial frame. This enables one to avoid the problem with a strong formulation of local causality related to the breaking of Bell's inequalities in QM. Our analysis has been focused mainly on the problem of the existence of a proper position operator for massive particles. We have proved that in our framework such an operator exists for particles with arbitrary spin. This operator is Hermitian and covariant, it has commuting components, and its eigenvectors (localized states) are covariant too. We have found an explicit form of the position operator and demonstrated that it coincides with the Newton-Wigner one in the preferred frame. We have also defined a covariant spin operator and constructed an invariant spin squared operator. Moreover, full algebra of observables consisting of position, four-momentum, and spin operators is manifestly Poincar\'e covariant in this framework. Our results support expectations of other authors [J. S. Bell, in Quantum Gravity, edited by C. J. Isham, R. Penrose, and D. W. Sciama (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1981), p. 611; P. H. Eberhard, Nuovo Cimento B 46, 392 (1978)] that a consistent formulation of quantum mechanics demands the existence of a preferred frame.