Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/9808013 · Physical Review A

Lorentz-covariant quantum mechanics and preferred frame

Paweł Caban, Jakub Rembieliński

Published Jun 1, 1999• 46 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

In this paper the relativistic quantum mechanics (QM) is considered in the framework of the nonstandard synchronization scheme, which preserves the Poincar\'e covariance but (at least formally) distinguishes an inertial frame. This enables one to avoid the problem with a strong formulation of local causality related to the breaking of Bell's inequalities in QM. Our analysis has been focused mainly on the problem of the existence of a proper position operator for massive particles. We have proved that in our framework such an operator exists for particles with arbitrary spin. This operator is Hermitian and covariant, it has commuting components, and its eigenvectors (localized states) are covariant too. We have found an explicit form of the position operator and demonstrated that it coincides with the Newton-Wigner one in the preferred frame. We have also defined a covariant spin operator and constructed an invariant spin squared operator. Moreover, full algebra of observables consisting of position, four-momentum, and spin operators is manifestly Poincar\'e covariant in this framework. Our results support expectations of other authors [J. S. Bell, in Quantum Gravity, edited by C. J. Isham, R. Penrose, and D. W. Sciama (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1981), p. 611; P. H. Eberhard, Nuovo Cimento B 46, 392 (1978)] that a consistent formulation of quantum mechanics demands the existence of a preferred frame.

DOI
10.1103/physreva.59.4187

Related papers

Localization problem in quantum mechanics and preferred frame

Paweł Caban, Jakub Rembieliński

In this paper the localization problem in the relativistic quantum mechanics is considered in the framework of a nonstandard synchronization scheme for clocks. Such a synchronization preserves Poincaré covariance but (at least formally) distinguishes an inertial frame. Our analysis has been focused mainly on the problem of existence of a proper position operator for massive particles. We have found the explicit form of the position operator and have demonstrated that in the preferred frame our operator coincides with the Newton–Wigner one. Moreover, full algebra of observables consisting of position operators and fourmomentum operators is manifestly Poincaré covariant in this framework. Our results support expectations of other authors (Bell [1], Eberhard [3]) that a consistent formulation of quantum mechanics demands existence of a preferred frame.

AIP conference proceedings•Jan 1, 1998•1 citation

On relativistic quantum mechanics in the rest-frame instant form of dynamics

Luca Lusanna

A review is given of a new relativistic classical mechanics for N-particle systems compatible with relativistic bound states. It is formulated in global non-inertial frames in Minkowski space-time by means of parametrized Minkowski theories and then restricted to the intrinsic inertial rest frame of the isolated system. There is a complete control on the relativistic collective variables (Newton-Wigner center of mass, Fokker-Pryce center of inertia, M/oller center of energy) and on the realization of the Poincare' algebra (with the explicit form of the interaction-dependent Lorentz boosts). The particle world-lines are found to correspond to the ones of predictive mechanics and localization problems are clarified. The model can be consistently quantized avoiding the instantaneous spreading of the center-of-mass wave packets (Hegerfeldt theorem), because the non-local non-covariant center of mass is a non-measurable quantity. This implies that the Hilbert space must be the tensor product of the center-of-mass Hilbert space with the one of relative motions. This spatial non-separability (due to the Lorentz signature of space-time) makes relativistic entanglement much more involved than the non-relativistic one.

Journal of Physics Conference Series•Apr 22, 2013•4 citations

Lorentz-Invariant Localization for Elementary Systems. III. Zero-Mass Systems

Andrés J. Kálnay

The present series of papers is devoted to the localization problem in relativistic quantum mechanics. The consequences of imposing the condition that the descriptions of a localized state seen from two different frames of reference should be physically consistent were investigated in Paper II. Only instantaneous localization was studied. Considering elementary systems of nonzero mass and spin 0 and \textonehalf{}, the following results were found. (a) As regards the localization problem, one cannot avoid accepting at least one of the following strong departures from the usual ideas: (i) Position has no meaning; (ii) it violates the physical equivalence of inertial frames; (iii) it is the only quantum variable which cannot be represented by an operator; (iv) it is non-Hermitian; (v) some unusual interaction effects do not disappear when the interaction is switched off. (b) If a component of position is to be precisely measurable as a point, then for spin 0 there is only one possible position operator; for spin \textonehalf{} the operator is unique up to a parameter; in both cases the operators are non-Hermitian with respect to the relativistically invariant scalar product, but in spite of this the eigenvalues of all components are real. The components of position are compatible with each other for spin 0 and incompatible for spin \textonehalf{}. The communication relations of position with linear momentum are the standard ones. The velocity operator, which is Hermitian, has the expected form. Several authors have stated that the localization problem can have a solution for mass greater than zero, but for the zero-mass case a solution does not exist. In this paper the localization problem is studied for zero-mass elementary systems by only imposing, as in Paper II, the above requirement of physical consistency. We consider systems with spin 0, \textonehalf{}, and 1. We prove that the consequences are essentially the same as those obtained for systems of mass greater than zero. The parameter is no longer arbitrary.

Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields•May 15, 1971•15 citations

Position Operators and Proper Time in Relativistic Quantum Mechanics

Joseph E. Johnson

Covariant four-vector position operators ${X}^{\ensuremath{\mu}}$ are proposed, which form a natural operator generalization of the four-position in relativistic classical mechanics. These ${X}^{\ensuremath{\mu}}$ are defined by specifying commutation relations of the ${X}^{\ensuremath{\mu}}$ with the Poincar\'e generators ${P}^{\ensuremath{\mu}}$ and ${M}^{\ensuremath{\mu}\ensuremath{\nu}}$, and thereby extending the Poincar\'e algebra to a larger algebra whose representations are subsequently found. The ${X}^{\ensuremath{\mu}}$ are shown to be acceptable relativistic position operators within a proper-time dynamical framework. A single Hamiltonian is used for all spins, with a covariant proper-time description. The dynamics is capable of describing the time evolution of states which are not mass eigenstates. An automatic Foldy-Wouthuysen-type diagonalization is achieved for all spin representations, with spin and orbital angular momentum being separately conserved. The connection with the standard theory is made via the specific field equations. In making this connection to the standard theory of half-integral spins, the origin of Zitterbewegung and the nonseparate conservation of spin and angular momentum are clarified. The connection to Maxwell's equations provides an interesting statement of those equations and of gauge invariance. The unphysical representations of negative and imaginary mass and continuous spin are not present in this formalism. Other features are discussed.

Physical Review•May 25, 1969•69 citations

Relativistic quantum mechanics and relativistic entanglement in the rest-frame instant form of dynamics

David Alba, Horace W. Crater, Luca Lusanna

A new formulation of relativistic quantum mechanics is proposed in the framework of the rest-frame instant form of dynamics, where the world-lines of the particles are parametrized in terms of the Fokker-Pryce center of inertia and of Wigner-covariant relative 3-coordinates inside the instantaneous Wigner 3-spaces, and where there is a decoupled (non-covariant and non-local) canonical relativistic center of mass. This approach: (a) allows us to make a consistent quantization in every inertial frame; (b) leads to a description of both bound and scattering states; (c) offers new insights on the relativistic localization problem; (d) leads to a non-relativistic limit with a Hamilton-Jacobi treatment of the Newton center of mass; (e) clarifies non-local aspects (spatial non-separability) of relativistic entanglement connected with Lorentz signature and not present in its non-relativistic treatment.

arXiv:0907.1816•Journal of Mathematical Physics•Jun 1, 2011•38 citations

Covariant Position Operators, Spin, and Locality

Gordon N. Fleming

A manifestly covariant formalism is developed suitable for a discussion of position operators for relativistic systems. It is shown that the rest-frame center of mass and the frame-dependent center of mass, which were studied previously by Pryce and M\o{}ller, and the local Newton-Wigner operator all transform like the spatial part of a four-vector when appropriately interpreted. The formalism allows an equivalent treatment of the space and time components of a position four-vector operator, and manifestly covariant canonical commutation rules are obtained for the three operators mentioned above. Finally it is suggested that the Newton-Wigner operator be interpreted as a center of spin.

Physical Review•Jan 11, 1965•201 citations
In this paper the relativistic quantum mechanics (QM) is considered in the framework of the nonstandard synchronization scheme, which preserves the Poincar'e covariance but (at least formally) distinguishes an inertial frame. This enables one to avoid the problem with a strong formulation of local causality related to the breaking of Bell's inequalities in QM. Our analysis has been focused mainly on the problem of the existence of a proper position operator for massive particles. We have proved that in our framework such an operator exists for particles with arbitrary spin. This operator is Hermitian and covariant, it has commuting components, and its eigenvectors (localized states) are covariant too. We have found an explicit form of the position operator and demonstrated that it coincides with the Newton-Wigner one in the preferred frame. We have also defined a covariant spin operator and constructed an invariant spin squared operator. Moreover, full algebra of observables consisting of position, four-momentum, and spin operators is manifestly Poincar'e covariant in this framework. Our results support expectations of other authors [J. S. Bell, in Quantum Gravity, edited by C. J. Isham, R. Penrose, and D. W. Sciama (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1981), p. 611; P. H. Eberhard, Nuovo Cimento B 46, 392 (1978)] that a consistent formulation of quantum mechanics demands the existence of a preferred frame.
In this paper the localization problem in the relativistic quantum mechanics is considered in the framework of a nonstandard synchronization scheme for clocks. Such a synchronization preserves Poincaré covariance but (at least formally) distinguishes an inertial frame. Our analysis has been focused mainly on the problem of existence of a proper position operator for massive particles. We have found the explicit form of the position operator and have demonstrated that in the preferred frame our operator coincides with the Newton–Wigner one. Moreover, full algebra of observables consisting of position operators and fourmomentum operators is manifestly Poincaré covariant in this framework. Our results support expectations of other authors (Bell [1], Eberhard [3]) that a consistent formulation of quantum mechanics demands existence of a preferred frame.
A review is given of a new relativistic classical mechanics for N-particle systems compatible with relativistic bound states. It is formulated in global non-inertial frames in Minkowski space-time by means of parametrized Minkowski theories and then restricted to the intrinsic inertial rest frame of the isolated system. There is a complete control on the relativistic collective variables (Newton-Wigner center of mass, Fokker-Pryce center of inertia, M/oller center of energy) and on the realization of the Poincare' algebra (with the explicit form of the interaction-dependent Lorentz boosts). The particle world-lines are found to correspond to the ones of predictive mechanics and localization problems are clarified. The model can be consistently quantized avoiding the instantaneous spreading of the center-of-mass wave packets (Hegerfeldt theorem), because the non-local non-covariant center of mass is a non-measurable quantity. This implies that the Hilbert space must be the tensor product of the center-of-mass Hilbert space with the one of relative motions. This spatial non-separability (due to the Lorentz signature of space-time) makes relativistic entanglement much more involved than the non-relativistic one.
The present series of papers is devoted to the localization problem in relativistic quantum mechanics. The consequences of imposing the condition that the descriptions of a localized state seen from two different frames of reference should be physically consistent were investigated in Paper II. Only instantaneous localization was studied. Considering elementary systems of nonzero mass and spin 0 and \textonehalf{}, the following results were found. (a) As regards the localization problem, one cannot avoid accepting at least one of the following strong departures from the usual ideas: (i) Position has no meaning; (ii) it violates the physical equivalence of inertial frames; (iii) it is the only quantum variable which cannot be represented by an operator; (iv) it is non-Hermitian; (v) some unusual interaction effects do not disappear when the interaction is switched off. (b) If a component of position is to be precisely measurable as a point, then for spin 0 there is only one possible position operator; for spin \textonehalf{} the operator is unique up to a parameter; in both cases the operators are non-Hermitian with respect to the relativistically invariant scalar product, but in spite of this the eigenvalues of all components are real. The components of position are compatible with each other for spin 0 and incompatible for spin \textonehalf{}. The communication relations of position with linear momentum are the standard ones. The velocity operator, which is Hermitian, has the expected form. Several authors have stated that the localization problem can have a solution for mass greater than zero, but for the zero-mass case a solution does not exist. In this paper the localization problem is studied for zero-mass elementary systems by only imposing, as in Paper II, the above requirement of physical consistency. We consider systems with spin 0, \textonehalf{}, and 1. We prove that the consequences are essentially the same as those obtained for systems of mass greater than zero. The parameter is no longer arbitrary.
Covariant four-vector position operators ${X}^{\ensuremath{\mu}}$ are proposed, which form a natural operator generalization of the four-position in relativistic classical mechanics. These ${X}^{\ensuremath{\mu}}$ are defined by specifying commutation relations of the ${X}^{\ensuremath{\mu}}$ with the Poincar\'e generators ${P}^{\ensuremath{\mu}}$ and ${M}^{\ensuremath{\mu}\ensuremath{\nu}}$, and thereby extending the Poincar\'e algebra to a larger algebra whose representations are subsequently found. The ${X}^{\ensuremath{\mu}}$ are shown to be acceptable relativistic position operators within a proper-time dynamical framework. A single Hamiltonian is used for all spins, with a covariant proper-time description. The dynamics is capable of describing the time evolution of states which are not mass eigenstates. An automatic Foldy-Wouthuysen-type diagonalization is achieved for all spin representations, with spin and orbital angular momentum being separately conserved. The connection with the standard theory is made via the specific field equations. In making this connection to the standard theory of half-integral spins, the origin of Zitterbewegung and the nonseparate conservation of spin and angular momentum are clarified. The connection to Maxwell's equations provides an interesting statement of those equations and of gauge invariance. The unphysical representations of negative and imaginary mass and continuous spin are not present in this formalism. Other features are discussed.
A new formulation of relativistic quantum mechanics is proposed in the framework of the rest-frame instant form of dynamics, where the world-lines of the particles are parametrized in terms of the Fokker-Pryce center of inertia and of Wigner-covariant relative 3-coordinates inside the instantaneous Wigner 3-spaces, and where there is a decoupled (non-covariant and non-local) canonical relativistic center of mass. This approach: (a) allows us to make a consistent quantization in every inertial frame; (b) leads to a description of both bound and scattering states; (c) offers new insights on the relativistic localization problem; (d) leads to a non-relativistic limit with a Hamilton-Jacobi treatment of the Newton center of mass; (e) clarifies non-local aspects (spatial non-separability) of relativistic entanglement connected with Lorentz signature and not present in its non-relativistic treatment.
A manifestly covariant formalism is developed suitable for a discussion of position operators for relativistic systems. It is shown that the rest-frame center of mass and the frame-dependent center of mass, which were studied previously by Pryce and M\o{}ller, and the local Newton-Wigner operator all transform like the spatial part of a four-vector when appropriately interpreted. The formalism allows an equivalent treatment of the space and time components of a position four-vector operator, and manifestly covariant canonical commutation rules are obtained for the three operators mentioned above. Finally it is suggested that the Newton-Wigner operator be interpreted as a center of spin.