Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical Review

Covariant Position Operators, Spin, and Locality

Gordon N. Fleming

Published Jan 11, 1965• 201 citations
Publisher

Abstract

A manifestly covariant formalism is developed suitable for a discussion of position operators for relativistic systems. It is shown that the rest-frame center of mass and the frame-dependent center of mass, which were studied previously by Pryce and M\o{}ller, and the local Newton-Wigner operator all transform like the spatial part of a four-vector when appropriately interpreted. The formalism allows an equivalent treatment of the space and time components of a position four-vector operator, and manifestly covariant canonical commutation rules are obtained for the three operators mentioned above. Finally it is suggested that the Newton-Wigner operator be interpreted as a center of spin.

DOI
10.1103/physrev.137.b188

Related papers

Newton-Wigner position operator and its corresponding spin operator in relativistic quantum mechanics

Taeseung Choi

A relativistic spin operator is to be the difference between the total and orbital angular momentum. As the unique position operator for a localized state, the remarkable Newton-Wigner position operator, which has all desirable commutation relations as a position operator, can give a proper spin operator. Historically important three spin operators respectively proposed by Bogolubov et al., Pryce, and Foldy-Woutheysen are investigated to manifest a corresponding spin operator to the Newton-Wigner position operator. We clarify a unique spin operator in relativistic quantum mechanics described by the Dirac Hamiltonian.

arXiv:1412.0351•Dec 1, 2014•0 citations

Newton-Wigner position operator and the corresponding spin operator in relativistic quantum mechanics

Taeseung Choi

A relativistic spin operator is the difference between the total and the orbital angular momentum. As the unique position operator for a localized state, the remarkable Newton-Wigner position operator, which has all the desirable commutation relations of a position operator, can give a proper spin operator. Historically, the three important spin operators proposed by Bogolubov et al. , Pryce, and Foldy-Woutheysen, respectively were investigated to manifest a spin operator corresponding to the Newton-Wigner position operator. We clarify a unique spin operator in relativistic quantum mechanics, which can be described by using the Dirac Hamiltonian.

Journal of the Korean Physical Society•Mar 1, 2015•4 citations

Lorentz-covariant quantum mechanics and preferred frame

Paweł Caban, Jakub Rembieliński

In this paper the relativistic quantum mechanics (QM) is considered in the framework of the nonstandard synchronization scheme, which preserves the Poincar\'e covariance but (at least formally) distinguishes an inertial frame. This enables one to avoid the problem with a strong formulation of local causality related to the breaking of Bell's inequalities in QM. Our analysis has been focused mainly on the problem of the existence of a proper position operator for massive particles. We have proved that in our framework such an operator exists for particles with arbitrary spin. This operator is Hermitian and covariant, it has commuting components, and its eigenvectors (localized states) are covariant too. We have found an explicit form of the position operator and demonstrated that it coincides with the Newton-Wigner one in the preferred frame. We have also defined a covariant spin operator and constructed an invariant spin squared operator. Moreover, full algebra of observables consisting of position, four-momentum, and spin operators is manifestly Poincar\'e covariant in this framework. Our results support expectations of other authors [J. S. Bell, in Quantum Gravity, edited by C. J. Isham, R. Penrose, and D. W. Sciama (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1981), p. 611; P. H. Eberhard, Nuovo Cimento B 46, 392 (1978)] that a consistent formulation of quantum mechanics demands the existence of a preferred frame.

arXiv:quant-ph/9808013•Physical Review A•Jun 1, 1999•46 citations

Relativistic quantum mechanics and relativistic entanglement in the rest-frame instant form of dynamics

David Alba, Horace W. Crater, Luca Lusanna

A new formulation of relativistic quantum mechanics is proposed in the framework of the rest-frame instant form of dynamics, where the world-lines of the particles are parametrized in terms of the Fokker-Pryce center of inertia and of Wigner-covariant relative 3-coordinates inside the instantaneous Wigner 3-spaces, and where there is a decoupled (non-covariant and non-local) canonical relativistic center of mass. This approach: (a) allows us to make a consistent quantization in every inertial frame; (b) leads to a description of both bound and scattering states; (c) offers new insights on the relativistic localization problem; (d) leads to a non-relativistic limit with a Hamilton-Jacobi treatment of the Newton center of mass; (e) clarifies non-local aspects (spatial non-separability) of relativistic entanglement connected with Lorentz signature and not present in its non-relativistic treatment.

arXiv:0907.1816•Journal of Mathematical Physics•Jun 1, 2011•38 citations

Relativistic Position Operator for Free Particles

Amitabha Chakrabarti

Certain definitions and derivations for the relativistic center of mass are considered and are related to the position operator corresponding to the representation proposed in a previous paper. It is shown that the classical definition of Pryce has indeed a more direct correspondence with our representation than the Foldy-Wouthuysen representation, in spite of the fact that Pryce's particular method of symmetrization leads to the latter. In the process of derivation, the points of view of Synge, Pryce, and Shirokov are compared and the expressions for the velocity and the intrinsic angular momentum corresponding to the different definitions are given. In the Appendix, our operator is compared with that of Newton and Wigner for the case of spin ½.

Journal of Mathematical Physics•Oct 1, 1963•40 citations

Position Operators and Proper Time in Relativistic Quantum Mechanics

Joseph E. Johnson

Covariant four-vector position operators ${X}^{\ensuremath{\mu}}$ are proposed, which form a natural operator generalization of the four-position in relativistic classical mechanics. These ${X}^{\ensuremath{\mu}}$ are defined by specifying commutation relations of the ${X}^{\ensuremath{\mu}}$ with the Poincar\'e generators ${P}^{\ensuremath{\mu}}$ and ${M}^{\ensuremath{\mu}\ensuremath{\nu}}$, and thereby extending the Poincar\'e algebra to a larger algebra whose representations are subsequently found. The ${X}^{\ensuremath{\mu}}$ are shown to be acceptable relativistic position operators within a proper-time dynamical framework. A single Hamiltonian is used for all spins, with a covariant proper-time description. The dynamics is capable of describing the time evolution of states which are not mass eigenstates. An automatic Foldy-Wouthuysen-type diagonalization is achieved for all spin representations, with spin and orbital angular momentum being separately conserved. The connection with the standard theory is made via the specific field equations. In making this connection to the standard theory of half-integral spins, the origin of Zitterbewegung and the nonseparate conservation of spin and angular momentum are clarified. The connection to Maxwell's equations provides an interesting statement of those equations and of gauge invariance. The unphysical representations of negative and imaginary mass and continuous spin are not present in this formalism. Other features are discussed.

Physical Review•May 25, 1969•69 citations
A manifestly covariant formalism is developed suitable for a discussion of position operators for relativistic systems. It is shown that the rest-frame center of mass and the frame-dependent center of mass, which were studied previously by Pryce and M\o{}ller, and the local Newton-Wigner operator all transform like the spatial part of a four-vector when appropriately interpreted. The formalism allows an equivalent treatment of the space and time components of a position four-vector operator, and manifestly covariant canonical commutation rules are obtained for the three operators mentioned above. Finally it is suggested that the Newton-Wigner operator be interpreted as a center of spin.
A relativistic spin operator is to be the difference between the total and orbital angular momentum. As the unique position operator for a localized state, the remarkable Newton-Wigner position operator, which has all desirable commutation relations as a position operator, can give a proper spin operator. Historically important three spin operators respectively proposed by Bogolubov et al., Pryce, and Foldy-Woutheysen are investigated to manifest a corresponding spin operator to the Newton-Wigner position operator. We clarify a unique spin operator in relativistic quantum mechanics described by the Dirac Hamiltonian.
A relativistic spin operator is the difference between the total and the orbital angular momentum. As the unique position operator for a localized state, the remarkable Newton-Wigner position operator, which has all the desirable commutation relations of a position operator, can give a proper spin operator. Historically, the three important spin operators proposed by Bogolubov et al. , Pryce, and Foldy-Woutheysen, respectively were investigated to manifest a spin operator corresponding to the Newton-Wigner position operator. We clarify a unique spin operator in relativistic quantum mechanics, which can be described by using the Dirac Hamiltonian.
In this paper the relativistic quantum mechanics (QM) is considered in the framework of the nonstandard synchronization scheme, which preserves the Poincar\'e covariance but (at least formally) distinguishes an inertial frame. This enables one to avoid the problem with a strong formulation of local causality related to the breaking of Bell's inequalities in QM. Our analysis has been focused mainly on the problem of the existence of a proper position operator for massive particles. We have proved that in our framework such an operator exists for particles with arbitrary spin. This operator is Hermitian and covariant, it has commuting components, and its eigenvectors (localized states) are covariant too. We have found an explicit form of the position operator and demonstrated that it coincides with the Newton-Wigner one in the preferred frame. We have also defined a covariant spin operator and constructed an invariant spin squared operator. Moreover, full algebra of observables consisting of position, four-momentum, and spin operators is manifestly Poincar\'e covariant in this framework. Our results support expectations of other authors [J. S. Bell, in Quantum Gravity, edited by C. J. Isham, R. Penrose, and D. W. Sciama (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1981), p. 611; P. H. Eberhard, Nuovo Cimento B 46, 392 (1978)] that a consistent formulation of quantum mechanics demands the existence of a preferred frame.
A new formulation of relativistic quantum mechanics is proposed in the framework of the rest-frame instant form of dynamics, where the world-lines of the particles are parametrized in terms of the Fokker-Pryce center of inertia and of Wigner-covariant relative 3-coordinates inside the instantaneous Wigner 3-spaces, and where there is a decoupled (non-covariant and non-local) canonical relativistic center of mass. This approach: (a) allows us to make a consistent quantization in every inertial frame; (b) leads to a description of both bound and scattering states; (c) offers new insights on the relativistic localization problem; (d) leads to a non-relativistic limit with a Hamilton-Jacobi treatment of the Newton center of mass; (e) clarifies non-local aspects (spatial non-separability) of relativistic entanglement connected with Lorentz signature and not present in its non-relativistic treatment.
Certain definitions and derivations for the relativistic center of mass are considered and are related to the position operator corresponding to the representation proposed in a previous paper. It is shown that the classical definition of Pryce has indeed a more direct correspondence with our representation than the Foldy-Wouthuysen representation, in spite of the fact that Pryce's particular method of symmetrization leads to the latter. In the process of derivation, the points of view of Synge, Pryce, and Shirokov are compared and the expressions for the velocity and the intrinsic angular momentum corresponding to the different definitions are given. In the Appendix, our operator is compared with that of Newton and Wigner for the case of spin ½.
Covariant four-vector position operators ${X}^{\ensuremath{\mu}}$ are proposed, which form a natural operator generalization of the four-position in relativistic classical mechanics. These ${X}^{\ensuremath{\mu}}$ are defined by specifying commutation relations of the ${X}^{\ensuremath{\mu}}$ with the Poincar\'e generators ${P}^{\ensuremath{\mu}}$ and ${M}^{\ensuremath{\mu}\ensuremath{\nu}}$, and thereby extending the Poincar\'e algebra to a larger algebra whose representations are subsequently found. The ${X}^{\ensuremath{\mu}}$ are shown to be acceptable relativistic position operators within a proper-time dynamical framework. A single Hamiltonian is used for all spins, with a covariant proper-time description. The dynamics is capable of describing the time evolution of states which are not mass eigenstates. An automatic Foldy-Wouthuysen-type diagonalization is achieved for all spin representations, with spin and orbital angular momentum being separately conserved. The connection with the standard theory is made via the specific field equations. In making this connection to the standard theory of half-integral spins, the origin of Zitterbewegung and the nonseparate conservation of spin and angular momentum are clarified. The connection to Maxwell's equations provides an interesting statement of those equations and of gauge invariance. The unphysical representations of negative and imaginary mass and continuous spin are not present in this formalism. Other features are discussed.