Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical Review

The Invariant Form of Quantum Equations and the Schroedinger-Heisenberg Parallelism

Edward M. Corson

Published Feb 1, 1947• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Some years have passed since the appearance of Dirac's striking interpretation of the Heisenberg-Schroedinger parallelism in the equations of motion, and yet it appears that there still remain obscure points which have led to misunderstanding. Although the Schroedinger method suffices to deal with many practical problems, the flexibility of the Dirac-Jordan representation theory, aside from its intrinsic unity and beauty, recommends it to general theoretical investigation. The present paper considers the invariant form of the equations of motion in relation to the Schroedinger-Heisenberg pictures of quantum mechanics insofar as the latter refer to the "pictured" intrinsic motion of states (vectors) and observables (Hermitian operators). The discussion is divided roughly into 5-sections: Operator and Vector Transforms, Contact Transformations, Heisenberg-Schroedinger Operators, Equations of Motion and Invariant Properties, and the Density Operator and Operator Spur. Where possible, quasi-geometrical diagrams are given to illustrate the relation and transition between the several "pictures of the motion."

DOI
10.1103/physrev.71.200

Related papers

Equation of Motion

Ahmad Amer

This chapter explores the Schrödinger and Heisenberg pictures in quantum mechanics, emphasizing their mathematical equivalence and physical consistency. The two formulations are shown to be connected by a unitary transformation. The Heisenberg equation of motion is derived, and the time evolution of operators—particularly those not explicitly dependent on time—is expressed in terms of their initial values. It is demonstrated that scalar products, expectation values, matrix elements, and commutation relations remain invariant under the change of picture. Drawing a close analogy with classical mechanics, Dirac's insight is presented: the quantum mechanical counterpart of the classical Poisson bracket is the operator commutator divided by iℏ . The chapter concludes by deriving the Lorentz force law within the quantum framework using commutator algebra. Metadata/Keywords: Schrödinger picture, Heisenberg picture, unitary transformation, Heisenberg equation of motion, Poisson bracket, Lorentz force, time evolution, expectation values

CRC Press eBooks•Nov 5, 2025•0 citations

A Note on the Equations of Motion in Non-Relativistic Quantum Mechanics

F. C. Powell

It is well known that the motion of a dynamical system can be pictured in two distinct ways, which Dirac names the Heisenberg picture and the Schrödinger picture. The equations of motion take different forms in the two pictures, but of course have identical physical consequences, since the motion of the system does not depend in any way on which picture we choose. It should therefore be possible to express the equations in an invariant form (independent, that is, of the picture used). It will be shown in this note that not only can this be done (equation (3)), but it can be done in such a way that it is not even necessary to introduce a picture at all (equation (3′)).

Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society•Apr 1, 1935•0 citations

Q. M. Pictures; Heisenberg Equation; Linear Response; Superoperators and Non-Markovian Equations

Norman J. M. Horing

Abstract Three fundamental and equivalent mathematical frameworks (“pictures”) in which quantum theory can be lodged are exhibited and their relations and relative advantages/disadvantages are discussed: (1) The Schrödinger picture considers the dynamical development of the overall system state vector as a function of time relative to a fixed complete set of time-independent basis eigenstates; (2) The Heisenberg picture (convenient for the use of Green’s functions) embeds the dynamical development of the system in a time-dependent counter-rotation of the complete set of basis eigenstates relative to the fixed, time-independent overall system state, so that the relation of the latter fixed system state to the counter-rotating basis eigenstates is identically the same in the Heisenberg picture as it is in the Schrödinger picture; (3) the Interaction Picture addresses the situation in which a Hamiltonian, H=H0+H1, involves a part H0 whose equations are relatively easy to solve and a more complicated part, H1, treated perturbatively. The Heisenberg equation of motion for operators is discussed, and is applied to annihilation and creation operators. The S-matrix, density matrix and von Neumann equation, along with superoperators and non-Markovian kinetic equations are also addressed (e.g. the intracollisional field effect).

•Jul 27, 2017•0 citations

A new look at the quantum Liouville theorem

Pui Tak Leung

We clarify certain confusions in the literature of the density operator in quantum mechanics, and demonstrate that the quantum Liouville theorem has the same form in both the Schrodinger and the Heisenberg pictures.Our starting point is to treat the density operator as an observable which has its specific time dependence in each of the two pictures.It is further shown that such a formulation will provide the exact correspondence between classical and quantum statistical mechanics with the Liouville theorem being interpreted as a conservation law, which is derivable from the equation of motion only in the quantum case.

•Aug 8, 2020•0 citations

Remarks on the Formulation of Quantum Mechanics with Classical Pictures and on Relations between Linear Scalar Fields and Hydrodynamical Fields

Takehiko Takabayasi

The formulation of quantum mechanics in terms of the picture of trajectory ensemble or of the hydrodynamical picture, developed in a previous article, is further supplemented for some points. Individual trajectories for some typical non-stationary state are explicitly obtained, illustrating that they generally show complicated fluctuations due to the action of quantum potential. Next, emphasis is placed on the fact that the Schrödinger field admits a mechanical model. Also the Klein-Gordon field is represented with a quasi-irrotational flow under some additional scalar field. This representation of Klein-Gordon field suggests its possible generalization to include the vortical motion. Such treatments of interacting Klein-Gordon and electromagnetic fields involve the formalism of Dirac's recent classical electrodynamics as a limiting case. Some remarks are given on this Dirac's theory. Finally, the picture of trajectory ensemble is generalized so as to represent wave equations with sources. In an appendix criticism is given on the attempt to interpret quantum mechanics in terms of Markoff process.

Progress of Theoretical Physics•Mar 1, 1953•161 citations

Algebra of quantum mechanics via classical phonons. II: Klein-Gordon dynamics, the Heisenberg formalism, the Dirac canonical commutation rule and the Poincare algebra through the continuous Poisson bracket formalism

Emmanuel Giner

In the first part of this series we have shown how the Schrodinger equation for a single particle and the corresponding non relativistic quantum observables can be obtained from a purely classical phonon model through the Newtonian equations of motion. In this work we focus instead on how the classical Hamiltonian formalism applied to the same phonon system allows to recover the feature of relativistic quantum mechanics for a single spinless particle. Using the classical nature of the phonon model, we naturally define continuous Poisson brackets between classical observables, which allows to recover the dynamics of such observables, i.e. the Ehrenfest relations associated to real-valued Klein-Gordon fields. The Poisson brackets also permits to obtain the generic form of constants of motions, thus generalizing the concept of inner products and momentum on Klein-Gordon fields. We then connect the formalism of real-valued classical functionals with that of hermitian operators and complex-valued wave functions. This is done through the introduction of a non-local complex-valued change of variables which allows to rewrite the real-valued Klein-Gordon equation in a form akin to the Schrodinger equation, and the classical observables as quantum expectation values. Then, we show how this change of variables allows to rewrite the classical Poisson brackets as commutators of hermitian operators. This points out the strict equivalence between the Heisenberg formalism and the formalism of classical Poisson bracket. Eventually, we illustrate how the Poisson brackets allows to recover the transformations of Poincare group in 1+1 dimension together with its algebra. The latter makes the link between the Lorentz invariant inner product of Mostafazadeh and the Casimir invariant associated to the mass of particle.

quant-pharXiv:2607.03909•Jul 7, 2026•0 citations
Some years have passed since the appearance of Dirac's striking interpretation of the Heisenberg-Schroedinger parallelism in the equations of motion, and yet it appears that there still remain obscure points which have led to misunderstanding. Although the Schroedinger method suffices to deal with many practical problems, the flexibility of the Dirac-Jordan representation theory, aside from its intrinsic unity and beauty, recommends it to general theoretical investigation. The present paper considers the invariant form of the equations of motion in relation to the Schroedinger-Heisenberg pictures of quantum mechanics insofar as the latter refer to the "pictured" intrinsic motion of states (vectors) and observables (Hermitian operators). The discussion is divided roughly into 5-sections: Operator and Vector Transforms, Contact Transformations, Heisenberg-Schroedinger Operators, Equations of Motion and Invariant Properties, and the Density Operator and Operator Spur. Where possible, quasi-geometrical diagrams are given to illustrate the relation and transition between the several "pictures of the motion."
This chapter explores the Schrödinger and Heisenberg pictures in quantum mechanics, emphasizing their mathematical equivalence and physical consistency. The two formulations are shown to be connected by a unitary transformation. The Heisenberg equation of motion is derived, and the time evolution of operators—particularly those not explicitly dependent on time—is expressed in terms of their initial values. It is demonstrated that scalar products, expectation values, matrix elements, and commutation relations remain invariant under the change of picture. Drawing a close analogy with classical mechanics, Dirac's insight is presented: the quantum mechanical counterpart of the classical Poisson bracket is the operator commutator divided by iℏ . The chapter concludes by deriving the Lorentz force law within the quantum framework using commutator algebra. Metadata/Keywords: Schrödinger picture, Heisenberg picture, unitary transformation, Heisenberg equation of motion, Poisson bracket, Lorentz force, time evolution, expectation values
It is well known that the motion of a dynamical system can be pictured in two distinct ways, which Dirac names the Heisenberg picture and the Schrödinger picture. The equations of motion take different forms in the two pictures, but of course have identical physical consequences, since the motion of the system does not depend in any way on which picture we choose. It should therefore be possible to express the equations in an invariant form (independent, that is, of the picture used). It will be shown in this note that not only can this be done (equation (3)), but it can be done in such a way that it is not even necessary to introduce a picture at all (equation (3′)).
Abstract Three fundamental and equivalent mathematical frameworks (“pictures”) in which quantum theory can be lodged are exhibited and their relations and relative advantages/disadvantages are discussed: (1) The Schrödinger picture considers the dynamical development of the overall system state vector as a function of time relative to a fixed complete set of time-independent basis eigenstates; (2) The Heisenberg picture (convenient for the use of Green’s functions) embeds the dynamical development of the system in a time-dependent counter-rotation of the complete set of basis eigenstates relative to the fixed, time-independent overall system state, so that the relation of the latter fixed system state to the counter-rotating basis eigenstates is identically the same in the Heisenberg picture as it is in the Schrödinger picture; (3) the Interaction Picture addresses the situation in which a Hamiltonian, H=H0+H1, involves a part H0 whose equations are relatively easy to solve and a more complicated part, H1, treated perturbatively. The Heisenberg equation of motion for operators is discussed, and is applied to annihilation and creation operators. The S-matrix, density matrix and von Neumann equation, along with superoperators and non-Markovian kinetic equations are also addressed (e.g. the intracollisional field effect).
We clarify certain confusions in the literature of the density operator in quantum mechanics, and demonstrate that the quantum Liouville theorem has the same form in both the Schrodinger and the Heisenberg pictures.Our starting point is to treat the density operator as an observable which has its specific time dependence in each of the two pictures.It is further shown that such a formulation will provide the exact correspondence between classical and quantum statistical mechanics with the Liouville theorem being interpreted as a conservation law, which is derivable from the equation of motion only in the quantum case.
The formulation of quantum mechanics in terms of the picture of trajectory ensemble or of the hydrodynamical picture, developed in a previous article, is further supplemented for some points. Individual trajectories for some typical non-stationary state are explicitly obtained, illustrating that they generally show complicated fluctuations due to the action of quantum potential. Next, emphasis is placed on the fact that the Schrödinger field admits a mechanical model. Also the Klein-Gordon field is represented with a quasi-irrotational flow under some additional scalar field. This representation of Klein-Gordon field suggests its possible generalization to include the vortical motion. Such treatments of interacting Klein-Gordon and electromagnetic fields involve the formalism of Dirac's recent classical electrodynamics as a limiting case. Some remarks are given on this Dirac's theory. Finally, the picture of trajectory ensemble is generalized so as to represent wave equations with sources. In an appendix criticism is given on the attempt to interpret quantum mechanics in terms of Markoff process.
In the first part of this series we have shown how the Schrodinger equation for a single particle and the corresponding non relativistic quantum observables can be obtained from a purely classical phonon model through the Newtonian equations of motion. In this work we focus instead on how the classical Hamiltonian formalism applied to the same phonon system allows to recover the feature of relativistic quantum mechanics for a single spinless particle. Using the classical nature of the phonon model, we naturally define continuous Poisson brackets between classical observables, which allows to recover the dynamics of such observables, i.e. the Ehrenfest relations associated to real-valued Klein-Gordon fields. The Poisson brackets also permits to obtain the generic form of constants of motions, thus generalizing the concept of inner products and momentum on Klein-Gordon fields. We then connect the formalism of real-valued classical functionals with that of hermitian operators and complex-valued wave functions. This is done through the introduction of a non-local complex-valued change of variables which allows to rewrite the real-valued Klein-Gordon equation in a form akin to the Schrodinger equation, and the classical observables as quantum expectation values. Then, we show how this change of variables allows to rewrite the classical Poisson brackets as commutators of hermitian operators. This points out the strict equivalence between the Heisenberg formalism and the formalism of classical Poisson bracket. Eventually, we illustrate how the Poisson brackets allows to recover the transformations of Poincare group in 1+1 dimension together with its algebra. The latter makes the link between the Lorentz invariant inner product of Mostafazadeh and the Casimir invariant associated to the mass of particle.