The behavior of an atom in a nonuniform magnetic field is analyzed, as well as the motion of a classical magnetic dipole (a spinning charged ball) and a rotating charged ring. For the atom it is shown that, while the magnetic field does no work on the electron-orbital contribution to the magnetic moment (the source of translational kinetic energy being the internal energy of the atom), whether or not it does work on the electron-spin contribution to the magnetic moment depends on whether the electron has an intrinsic rotational kinetic energy associated with its spin. A rotational kinetic energy for the electron is shown to be consistent with the Dirac equation. If the electron does have a rotational kinetic energy, the acceleration of a silver atom in a Stern-Gerlach experiment or the emission of a photon from an electron spin flip can be explained without requiring the magnetic field to do work. For a constant magnetic field gradient along the z axis, it is found that the classical objects oscillate in simple harmonic motion along the z axis, the total kinetic energy -- translational plus rotational -- being a constant of the motion. For the charged ball, the change in rotational kinetic energy is associated only with a change in the precession frequency, the rotation rate about the figure axis remaining constant.
The behavior of an atom in a nonuniform magnetic field is analyzed, as well as the motion of a classical magnetic dipole (a spinning charged ball) and a rotating charged ring. For the atom it is shown that, while the magnetic field does no work on the electron-orbital contribution to the magnetic moment (the source of translational kinetic energy being the internal energy of the atom), whether or not it does work on the electron-spin contribution to the magnetic moment depends on whether the electron has an intrinsic rotational kinetic energy associated with its spin. A rotational kinetic energy for the electron is shown to be consistent with the Dirac equation. If the electron does have a rotational kinetic energy, the acceleration of a silver atom in a Stern-Gerlach experiment or the emission of a photon from an electron spin flip can be explained without requiring the magnetic field to do work. For a constant magnetic field gradient along the z axis, it is found that the classical objects oscillate in simple harmonic motion along the z axis, the total kinetic energy -- translational plus rotational -- being a constant of the motion. For the charged ball, the change in rotational kinetic energy is associated only with a change in the precession frequency, the rotation rate about the figure axis remaining constant.
First, the experimental foundations for the existence of a new dynamical variable, the spin of particles, are presented. The Pauli equation is then derived in detail, two applications are given and the energy levels of a particle with spin in a constant magnetic field are studied. This is the analysis of Landau levels, which can be performed by using the known results on the spectrum of harmonic oscillators. In this chapter we also study in detail the addition of orbital angular momentum and spin, as well as the spin–orbit interaction with the resulting Thomas precession. Stern-Gerlach experiment and electron spin The hypothesis that the electron has an intrinsic magnetic moment and an angular momentum, in short a spin , was first suggested in Uhlenbeck and Goudsmit (1926). They noticed, even before the discovery of quantum mechanics, that a complete description of spectra was not possible unless a magnetic moment and a mechanical moment were ascribed to the electron, and hence the concept of an electron as a point charge was insufficient. First, let us therefore try to understand how a magnetic moment can be associated to an atomic system. For this purpose, consider for simplicity the Bohr model of an hydrogen atom, where the electron moves along a circular orbit and rotates with orbital angular momentum L .
This chapter discusses the prime cause of the magnetic moment within an individual atom. In the classical model, the angular momentum of the electrons can be used to determine the magnetic moments of the electrons by invoking the concept of electrical charge in motion. There are two contributions to the electronic magnetic moment: an orbital magnetic moment due to orbital angular momentum and a spin magnetic moment due to electron spin. The component of orbital angular momentum along the axis of a magnetic field is restricted to discrete values by quantum mechanics. Electrons have spin angular momentum, which can be represented by the spin quantum number. As the magnetic field is increased and the field splitting becomes greater than the multiple splitting, the anomalous Zeeman effect changes over to a normal Zeeman effect. The chapter looks at experimental evidence confirming the quantization of magnetic moments, specifically the Zeeman effect and the Stern-Gerlach experiment.
Quantization of spin and orbital angular momenta in standard quantum mechanics is rooted in the fundamental rotational symmetry of space in conjunction with the results of experiments on atomic and subatomic particles conducted with the Stern-Gerlach apparatus. We explain some of the most important features of spin and orbital angular momenta as inescapable consequences of elementary Stern-Gerlach experiments viewed in light of the rotational symmetry of space. The rotation operator is first derived for spin-½ particles, then extended to spin-1 particles by treating the case of a hydrogen atom in its ground state, where the spin of the proton combines with that of the electron to create a spin-1 triplet state. Along the way, we examine the evolution of a particle’s spin state under an applied magnetic field, where the interaction energy arises from the existence of a magnetic dipole moment for each particle in proportion to its spin angular momentum. Whereas a constant magnetic field B0 causes the particle’s magnetic moment to gyrate around the direction of B0, it will be seen that the presence of a small oscillating magnetic field perpendicular to B0 brings about the so-called Rabi oscillations, which involve periodic flippings of the particle’s spin orientation. In the case of a hydrogen atom in its ground state, the interaction between the magnetic dipole moments of the proton and the electron splits the ground state between a lower energy singlet having a net angular momentum of zero (spin-0 state), and a higher energy triplet having a total angular momentum of ħ (spin-1 state). This hyperfine splitting is the source of the well-known 21-cm line observed in the spectrum of the hydrogen atom, which arises from transitions between the atom’s singlet and triplet states. In the final section, we put forward an argument (originally made by Richard Feynman) that ties the rotational symmetry of space to the conservation of angular momentum in quantum mechanics. The argument is, in fact, quite general, enabling one to deduce other conservation laws from various inherent symmetries of quantum mechanical systems.
The classical equations of motion of a charged point-particle with intrinsic spin under the influence of an external electromagnetic field are restated and compared with the Heisenberg equations of motion derived from the Dirac theory. The partition of angular momentum between particle and field in the classical theory is contrasted to the Dirac theory of electron spin. The analogy between the Dirac equation and the theory of parametric amplification is pointed out.A free spinning point particle moving according to the laws of classical relativistic point-particle mechanics may move along a helix. The sum of the intrinsic spin $\ensuremath{\sigma}$ and the angular momentum of the helical motion in this classical analog of zitterbewegung is an effective spin vector S which is a constant of the motion. Because of this internal motion, the effective mass M of the particle differs from the mass m which is ascribed to it in the equations of motion. Solutions are found in which S is parallel or antiparallel to the momentum, and the sign of M is determined by the helicity. When placed in a uniform electromagnetic field, the particle behaves as if it had a rest mass M and a magnetic moment $\frac{e\ensuremath{\sigma}}{\mathrm{Mc}}$, in addition to any explicit magnetic moment that may be ascribed to it.
A detailed kinematic analysis was conducted based on the hypothesis of the photon as an electric dipole in combined motions, a rotation and a linear uniform motion perpendicular to its rotational axis. A particle wave coefficient(j) of a rotational object in combined motions is defined based on the analysis of the motion quantities, translational momentum and rotational angular momentum. The motion analysis explains the intrinsic nature of particle-wave duality, the relation among momentum, angular momentum and its wavelength when the rotational particle in combined motions. For the photon, j equals Planck constant (h), is the sum of its translational kinetic energy and rotational energy. The derivation processes of the wave equation of the photon, both the first order derivative method and the second order derivative method, demonstrate that the Dirac Equation is applicable to describe the motions of the photon as the dipole. The four wave components of the photon interpret why the negative energy solutions exist to the Dirac equation, which reveals the disk structure of dimetric spinvectors of the electron.
Niels Bohr showed that the magnetic moment of an electron cannot be determined by a Stern-Gerlach experiment. His argument is extended to other moments, and general conditions are stated as to when a moment determination is feasible by such an experiment. In addition, the expectation-value equations are given for a stationary, gyrating, nonrelativistic, spin-1 particle in arbitrary, but classical, external electro-magnetic fields. For such a dipole-quadrupole system there is no distinction between the classical and quantal descriptions. Of interest is the fact that SU(3) is the invariance group of the motion. The theory is extended to the relativistic domain by Lorentz transformation. The group SU(3,1) appears as the invariance group of the internal motion.