Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Optics Communications

Quantum atom-field relative phase in the Jaynes-Cummings model

Alfredo Luis, Luis Lorenzo Sánchez-Soto

Published Jan 1, 1997• 6 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1016/s0030-4018(96)00441-5

Related papers

Amplitude-squared squeezing in the multiphoton Jaynes-Cummings model: Effect of phases

A.M. Abdel-Hafez, A.‐S. F. Obada

The phenomenon of amplitude-squared squeezing is investigated for the one- and two-photon Jaynes-Cummings model. The relative phase between the atomic coherent state and the coherent field state is found to affect this phenomenon with larger amounts of squeezing that can be found by changing the angles (\ensuremath{\theta}) for fixed relative phase.

Physical Review A•Nov 1, 1991•21 citations

Quantum phase transition of the Jaynes-Cummings model

Cheng Liu, Jin‐Feng Huang

arXiv:2306.13519•Science China Physics Mechanics and Astronomy•Nov 23, 2023•25 citations

Quantum Phase Transition in a Modified Jaynes-Cummings Model

Moorad Alexanian

We introduce a modified Jaynes-Cummings model with single-photon cavity radiation field but with the atomic system instead of exchanging a single photon as in the Jaynes-Cummings model, it exchanges instead a squeezed photon with squeezing parameter r. This allows us to interpolate between the Rabi model (r = ∞) and the Jaynes-Cummings model (r = 0) by varying r. The model exhibits a quantum phase transition. Accordingly, the quantum phase transition realized in the Rabi model, giving rise to superradiance, also occurs in the Jaynes-Cummings model.

arXiv:2405.15876•Armenian Journal of Physics•May 23, 2024•2 citations

Quantum phase in the Jaynes-Cummings model describing an electric dipole transition

A.S. Shumovsky, Özgür Esat Müstecaplıoğlu

Physics Letters A•Nov 1, 1997•4 citations

Population trapping in the Jaynes-Cummings model via phase coupling

J. I. Cirac, Luis Lorenzo Sánchez-Soto

An expression for the population inversion in the Jaynes-Cummings model and the most general initial state of the atom-field system is presented. States that maintain the same level of population inversion when the atom and the field are initially decoupled are found. When the atom is prepared in a coherent superposition of its states and the field is in an eigenstate of the Susskind-Glogower phase operator, for a certain choice of the relative phase between the atomic dipole and the field, coherent trapping occurs. The evolution of the squeezing of the field for these states is given, and the dependence on the phase and on the mean photon number of the field is studied.

Physical Review A•Sep 1, 1990•38 citations

Nonlinear Jaynes?Cummings Model of Atom?Field Interaction

S. Sivakumar

arXiv:quant-ph/0302046•International Journal of Theoretical Physics•Dec 1, 2004•48 citations
We introduce a modified Jaynes-Cummings model with single-photon cavity radiation field but with the atomic system instead of exchanging a single photon as in the Jaynes-Cummings model, it exchanges instead a squeezed photon with squeezing parameter r. This allows us to interpolate between the Rabi model (r = ∞) and the Jaynes-Cummings model (r = 0) by varying r. The model exhibits a quantum phase transition. Accordingly, the quantum phase transition realized in the Rabi model, giving rise to superradiance, also occurs in the Jaynes-Cummings model.
An expression for the population inversion in the Jaynes-Cummings model and the most general initial state of the atom-field system is presented. States that maintain the same level of population inversion when the atom and the field are initially decoupled are found. When the atom is prepared in a coherent superposition of its states and the field is in an eigenstate of the Susskind-Glogower phase operator, for a certain choice of the relative phase between the atomic dipole and the field, coherent trapping occurs. The evolution of the squeezing of the field for these states is given, and the dependence on the phase and on the mean photon number of the field is studied.