Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physics Letters A

Some remarks on the “no-interaction” assumption in the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen argument

Yalçin Koç

Published Aug 1, 1982• 2 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1016/0375-9601(82)90394-2

Related papers

The Relativistic Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Argument

Michael L. G. Redhead

Jerusalem studies in philosophy and history of science•Jan 1, 2020•0 citations

On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen argument: Its recent critique and its meaning

Nickola Stefanov Todorov

Physics Letters A•Aug 1, 1983•0 citations

A formal statement of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen argument

James H. McGrath

International Journal of Theoretical Physics•Jul 1, 1978•8 citations

A remark on the paradox of Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen

Rokuo Kawabe

Il Nuovo Cimento•Jul 1, 1959•1 citation

An Extended-Probability Response to the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Argument

Wolfgang Muckenheim

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1988•4 citations

Logical refutation of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen argument.

O. Chavoya-Aceves

Physics Essays•Mar 1, 2013•1 citation