Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physics Letters A

On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen argument: Its recent critique and its meaning

Nickola Stefanov Todorov

Published Aug 1, 1983• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1016/0375-9601(83)90519-4

Related papers

Reexamination of the arguments of Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen

P. A. Moldauer

Foundations of Physics•Jun 1, 1974•3 citations

A formal statement of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen argument

James H. McGrath

International Journal of Theoretical Physics•Jul 1, 1978•8 citations

The Relativistic Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Argument

Michael L. G. Redhead

Jerusalem studies in philosophy and history of science•Jan 1, 2020•0 citations

A Critique Of John Bell's 1964 Article On The Einstein Podolsky Rosen Paradox

Roger Mc Murtrie

•Oct 3, 2026•0 citations

Logical refutation of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen argument.

O. Chavoya-Aceves

Physics Essays•Mar 1, 2013•1 citation

An Extended-Probability Response to the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Argument

Wolfgang Muckenheim

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1988•4 citations