Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

A Critique Of John Bell's 1964 Article On The Einstein Podolsky Rosen Paradox

Roger Mc Murtrie

Published Oct 3, 2026• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.5281/zenodo.23117266

Related papers

Bell (1964): on the Einstein Podolsky Rosen Paradox [edit-1]

J. S. Bell

•Jan 1, 2019•0 citations

Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox and Bell's Inequalities

Willy De Baere

Advances in electronics and electron physics•Jan 1, 1986•20 citations

Comment on "Resolution of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen and Bell Paradoxes"

N. David Mermin

Physical Review Letters•Oct 18, 1982•19 citations

The Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen Paradox, Bell’s Theorem and Nonlocality

Douglas L. Hemmick, Asif M. Shakur

SpringerBriefs in physics•Sep 30, 2011•0 citations

Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox, Bell's inequality, and the projection postulate

Andrei Yu. Khrennikov

Journal of Russian Laser Research•Mar 1, 2008•5 citations

Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox and Bell's inequality experiments using time and frequency

Lloyd M. Davis

Physics Letters A•Oct 1, 1989•4 citations