Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Jerusalem studies in philosophy and history of science

The Relativistic Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Argument

Michael L. G. Redhead

Published Jan 1, 2020• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-3-030-34316-3_21

Related papers

Logical refutation of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen argument.

O. Chavoya-Aceves

Physics Essays•Mar 1, 2013•1 citation

A relativistic formulation of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox

Gerrit J. Smith, Robert Weingard

Foundations of Physics•Feb 1, 1987•9 citations

A formal statement of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen argument

James H. McGrath

International Journal of Theoretical Physics•Jul 1, 1978•8 citations

On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen argument: Its recent critique and its meaning

Nickola Stefanov Todorov

Physics Letters A•Aug 1, 1983•0 citations

Reexamination of the arguments of Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen

P. A. Moldauer

Foundations of Physics•Jun 1, 1974•3 citations

An Extended-Probability Response to the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Argument

Wolfgang Muckenheim

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1988•4 citations