Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

International Conference on Quantum Information

Electromagnetically induced transparency in superconducting circuits

Barry C. Sanders

Published Jan 1, 2011• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

I discuss Autler-Townes splitting and electromagnetically induced transparency in superconducting circuits, how to incorporate lasing without inversion, and the benefit of extending from one to several atoms.
DOI
10.1364/icqi.2011.qtub1

Related papers

Electromagnetically Induced Transparency and Autler–Townes Splitting in a Superconducting Quantum Circuit with a Four-Level V-Type Energy Spectrum

Hai‐Chao Li, Guo-Qin Ge, Lingmin Liao +1 more

Foundations of Physics•Dec 17, 2014•3 citations

Autler-Townes Spectroscopy and Electromagnetically Induced Transparency in a Superconducting Qubit

J. E. Robinson, С. А. Новиков, Z.K. Keane +3 more

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Jun 4, 2013•0 citations

Enhanced absorption and Autler-Townes splitting of electromagnetically induced transparency

Matthew T. Simons, Christopher L. Holloway, Joshua Gordon +5 more

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Jun 10, 2015•0 citations

Objectively Discerning Autler-Townes Splitting from Electromagnetically Induced Transparency

Petr M. Anisimov, Jonathan P. Dowling, Barry C. Sanders

Autler-Townes splitting (ATS) and electromagnetically induced transparency (EIT) both yield transparency in an absorption profile, but only EIT yields strong transparency for a weak pump field due to Fano interference. Empirically discriminating EIT from ATS is important but so far has been subjective. We introduce an objective method, based on Akaike's information criterion, to test ATS vs EIT from experimental data for three-level atomic systems and determine which pertains. We apply our method to a recently reported induced-transparency experiment in superconducting-circuit quantum electrodynamics.

arXiv:1102.0546•Physical Review Letters•Oct 12, 2011•288 citations

Electromagnetically-induced transparency combined with lasing without inversion in superconducting qubits

Jérôme Bourassa, Jaewoo Joo, Alexandre Blais +1 more

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 19, 2010•0 citations

Autler-Townes Splitting vs. Electromagnetically Induced Transparency: Objective Criterion to Discern Between Them in any Experiment

Petr M. Anisimov, Jonathan P. Dowling, Barry C. Sanders

Autler-Townes splitting (ATS) and electromagnetically-induced transparency (EIT) both yield transparency in an absorption profile, but only EIT yields strong transparency for a weak pump field due to Fano interference. Empirically discriminating EIT from ATS is important but so far has been subjective. We introduce an objective method, based on Akaike's information criterion, to test ATS vs. EIT from experimental data and determine which pertains. We apply our method to a recently reported induced-transparency experiment in superconducting circuit quantum electrodynamics.

•Feb 2, 2011•1 citation
Autler-Townes splitting (ATS) and electromagnetically induced transparency (EIT) both yield transparency in an absorption profile, but only EIT yields strong transparency for a weak pump field due to Fano interference. Empirically discriminating EIT from ATS is important but so far has been subjective. We introduce an objective method, based on Akaike's information criterion, to test ATS vs EIT from experimental data for three-level atomic systems and determine which pertains. We apply our method to a recently reported induced-transparency experiment in superconducting-circuit quantum electrodynamics.
Autler-Townes splitting (ATS) and electromagnetically-induced transparency (EIT) both yield transparency in an absorption profile, but only EIT yields strong transparency for a weak pump field due to Fano interference. Empirically discriminating EIT from ATS is important but so far has been subjective. We introduce an objective method, based on Akaike's information criterion, to test ATS vs. EIT from experimental data and determine which pertains. We apply our method to a recently reported induced-transparency experiment in superconducting circuit quantum electrodynamics.