Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Bulletin of the American Physical Society

Enhanced absorption and Autler-Townes splitting of electromagnetically induced transparency

Matthew T. Simons, Christopher L. Holloway, Joshua Gordon, David Alexander Anderson, Stephanie Miller, Andrew Schwarzkopf, Nithiwadee Thaicharoen, Georg A. Raithel

Published Jun 10, 2015• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Observation of Autler-Townes Effect in ElectromagneticaUy Induced Transparency

杜志静, Shougang Zhang, 吴长江 +3 more

Chinese Physics Letters•Jan 1, 2010•0 citations

Autler-Townes Splitting vs. Electromagnetically Induced Transparency: Objective Criterion to Discern Between Them in any Experiment

Petr M. Anisimov, Jonathan P. Dowling, Barry C. Sanders

Autler-Townes splitting (ATS) and electromagnetically-induced transparency (EIT) both yield transparency in an absorption profile, but only EIT yields strong transparency for a weak pump field due to Fano interference. Empirically discriminating EIT from ATS is important but so far has been subjective. We introduce an objective method, based on Akaike's information criterion, to test ATS vs. EIT from experimental data and determine which pertains. We apply our method to a recently reported induced-transparency experiment in superconducting circuit quantum electrodynamics.

•Feb 2, 2011•1 citation

Objectively Discerning Autler-Townes Splitting from Electromagnetically Induced Transparency

Petr M. Anisimov, Jonathan P. Dowling, Barry C. Sanders

Autler-Townes splitting (ATS) and electromagnetically induced transparency (EIT) both yield transparency in an absorption profile, but only EIT yields strong transparency for a weak pump field due to Fano interference. Empirically discriminating EIT from ATS is important but so far has been subjective. We introduce an objective method, based on Akaike's information criterion, to test ATS vs EIT from experimental data for three-level atomic systems and determine which pertains. We apply our method to a recently reported induced-transparency experiment in superconducting-circuit quantum electrodynamics.

arXiv:1102.0546•Physical Review Letters•Oct 12, 2011•288 citations

Experiments in Electromagnetically Induced Transparency

A. Kasapi, G. Y. Yin, Manoj Kumar Jain +2 more

•May 8, 1994•0 citations

Crossover between electromagnetically induced transparency and Autler–Townes splitting with dispersion

Xiaogang Lu, Xingxu Miao, Jin-Hai Bai +5 more

Based on Akaike's information criterion (AIC) for a coherently driven ensemble of cold rubidium atoms, we study the crossover between electromagnetically induced transparency (EIT) and Autler–Townes (AT) splitting from the dispersion as well as the absorption viewpoint. We find that the dispersion signal is more sensitive than the absorption signal, showing more pronounced features in the Akaike per-point weights spectrum, which provides a cleaner way of discerning EIT from AT splitting.

Chinese Physics B•Sep 1, 2015•4 citations

Simulation of Electromagnetically Induced Transparency and Absorption

Thomas M. Jenkins

•Jan 1, 2013•0 citations
Autler-Townes splitting (ATS) and electromagnetically-induced transparency (EIT) both yield transparency in an absorption profile, but only EIT yields strong transparency for a weak pump field due to Fano interference. Empirically discriminating EIT from ATS is important but so far has been subjective. We introduce an objective method, based on Akaike's information criterion, to test ATS vs. EIT from experimental data and determine which pertains. We apply our method to a recently reported induced-transparency experiment in superconducting circuit quantum electrodynamics.
Autler-Townes splitting (ATS) and electromagnetically induced transparency (EIT) both yield transparency in an absorption profile, but only EIT yields strong transparency for a weak pump field due to Fano interference. Empirically discriminating EIT from ATS is important but so far has been subjective. We introduce an objective method, based on Akaike's information criterion, to test ATS vs EIT from experimental data for three-level atomic systems and determine which pertains. We apply our method to a recently reported induced-transparency experiment in superconducting-circuit quantum electrodynamics.