Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physics-Uspekhi

Comment on the paper by S É Shnoll et al.

Evgenii A. Kushnirenko, Ivan B. Pogozhev

Published Feb 28, 2000• 3 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1070/pu2000v043n02abeh000637

Related papers

Discussion: Comments on Professor Putnam’s Comments

Henry Margenau, Eugene Paul Wigner

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1995•17 citations

Comments on Professor Putnam’s Comments

Henry Margenau, Eugene Paul Wigner

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1997•1 citation

Reply to the comment by C.Camacho on PRL, v.77, p.5433

Alexander Gutin, Victor Abkevich, Eugene I. Shakhnovich

In this brief reply we point out to some misconceptions in C.Camacho's comment (cond-mat/9701210).

arXiv:cond-mat/9703230•Mar 26, 1997•0 citations

Remarks on reply to Johansen's comment

Anders Sewerin Johansen

Remarks on reply (cond-mat/0206368) to Johansen's comment (cond-mat/0205249)

arXiv:cond-mat/0206479•Jun 25, 2002•2 citations

Shnoll effect decade later

Matti Pitkänen

Shnoll and collaborators have discovered strange repeating patterns of random fluctuations of physical observables such as the number n of nuclear decays in a given time interval. Periodically occurring peaks for the distribution of the number N(n) of measurements producing n events in a series of measurements as a function of n is observed instead of a single peak. The positions of the peaks are not random and the patterns depend on position and time varying periodically in time scales possibly assignable to Earth-Sun and Earth-Moon gravitational interaction. These observations suggest a modification of the expected probability distributions but it is very difficult to imagine any physical mechanism in the standard physics framework. Rather, a universal deformation of predicted probability distributions could be in question requiring something analogous to the transition from classical physics to quantum physics. TGD inspired quantum measurement suggests a possible modification based on finite measurement resolution realized in terms of inclusions of hyper-finite factors of type II1, and on adelic physics obtained as fusion of real physics and various p-adic physics characterized by primes p.

Prespacetime journal•Jan 1, 2019•0 citations

Response to the Comments of A. Shimony

Laszlo Tisza

PSA Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association•Jan 1, 1976•0 citations
Shnoll and collaborators have discovered strange repeating patterns of random fluctuations of physical observables such as the number n of nuclear decays in a given time interval. Periodically occurring peaks for the distribution of the number N(n) of measurements producing n events in a series of measurements as a function of n is observed instead of a single peak. The positions of the peaks are not random and the patterns depend on position and time varying periodically in time scales possibly assignable to Earth-Sun and Earth-Moon gravitational interaction. These observations suggest a modification of the expected probability distributions but it is very difficult to imagine any physical mechanism in the standard physics framework. Rather, a universal deformation of predicted probability distributions could be in question requiring something analogous to the transition from classical physics to quantum physics. TGD inspired quantum measurement suggests a possible modification based on finite measurement resolution realized in terms of inclusions of hyper-finite factors of type II1, and on adelic physics obtained as fusion of real physics and various p-adic physics characterized by primes p.