© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

Terms Privacy Legal Notice

Springer eBooks

Comments on Professor Putnam’s Comments

Henry Margenau, Eugene Paul Wigner

Published Jan 1, 1997• 1 citation

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-09203-3_46

Related papers

Discussion: Comments on Professor Putnam’s Comments

Henry Margenau, Eugene Paul Wigner

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1995•17 citations

A Reply to Professor Liboff

Sherman T. Folland

•Apr 1, 2000•0 citations

Comment on Putnam's ?Quantum mechanics and the observer?

Dieter Mayr

Erkenntnis•Jul 1, 1981•1 citation

Reply to Dr. Wigner's Objections

John F. Clauser

American Journal of Physics•Sep 1, 1971•6 citations

Answer to Knittl's critical remarks

Antonín Vašíček

Czechoslovak Journal of Physics•Jan 1, 1958•1 citation

Reply to Professor Leroyer's comment concerning the article "Analytical solution of the 2D classical Heisenberg model"

Jacques Curély

In his comment Professor Leroyer notes that the expression of the zero-field partition function Z N (0) is not proved. In the lines below we briefly explain how to derive it from eq. (3) of my preceding article [ Europhys. Lett. , 32 (1995) 529].

Europhysics Letters (EPL)•May 1, 1996•0 citations