Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Journal of Modern Optics

Equivalence of interaction Hamiltonians in the electric dipole approximation

Kazimierz Rza̧żewski, Robert W. Boyd

Published Mar 15, 2004• 62 citations
Publisher

Abstract

The interaction of an atomic system with an externally applied electromagnetic field can be treated in the electric dipole approximation by means of either the minimal coupling (p · A) or direct coupling (d · E) Hamiltonian. It is shown that both methods lead to identical and unambiguous predictions for observable quantities as long as the atomic wavefunctions are transformed when used in the minimal-coupling formulation. The physical meaning of kinetic momentum is used to show that the atomic states must be described by wavefunctions calculated in the absence of an electromagnetic field when using the d · E (but not the p · A) form of the interaction Hamiltonian. When, however, observables are calculated using the common approximations of resonance atomic physics – the two-level approximation and the rotatingwave approximation – the two formulations can lead to measurably different results. This point is illustrated by calculating the induced polarization (and hence the refractive index) of an atomic system for the two exactly soluble cases of the harmonic oscillator and the hydrogen atom.

DOI
10.1080/09500340310001631635

Related papers

A study of basic interaction Hamiltonians for quantum optics via an exactly solvable model

Marek Żukowski

The two basic interaction Hamiltonians for the quantum optical problems, namely the so-called minimal coupling one (p.A) and the multipolar one (d.E) are studied in the dipole approximation. The rigorous and exactly solvable model of an oscillator interacting with the electromagnetic field is employed. The Power-Zienau transformation is discussed. It is concluded that both Hamiltonians lead to the same S-matrix. The existence of an example like the one studied in this paper can be treated as support for the formal proofs given in the literature, which show that both Hamiltonians lead to the same predictions in the case of the more realistic description of the interaction of atoms with photons.

Quantum Optics Journal of the European Optical Society Part B•Dec 1, 1989•0 citations

Further remarks on the Hamiltonian of quantum optics

Edwin Albert Power, T. Thirunamachandran

The equations of motion and the class of Hamiltonians for electrodynamics, both classical and quantal, are considered for the interaction of radiation with bound charges within the electric-dipole approximation. It is emphasized that, despite the uniqueness of the equations of motion for physical variables, the form of the Hamiltonian is not unique and that a physical system is associated with an equivalence class of Hamiltonians. Two of the members of this class are the minimal-coupling and multipolar forms extensively used in quantum optics. It is shown that although different choices of Hamiltonians lead to different first-order equations of motion that connect canonical coordinates and momenta, they lead to the same second-order equations of motion for the physical variables and physical electromagnetic fields. In the quantum theory of electrodynamics the role played by the choice of representation for the operators and for the states is analyzed with care. The choice of representation leads to a freedom additional to that provided by canonical transformations in classical electrodyamics, although the two lead to the same operator equations of motion.

Journal of the Optical Society of America B•Jul 1, 1985•18 citations

Photon Exchange Between a Pair of Nonidentical Atoms with Two Forms of Interactions

Shahram Mohammad-Mehdi Golshan

A pair of nonidentical two-level atoms, separated by a fixed distance R, interact through photon exchange. The system is described by a state vector which is assumed to be a superposition of four "essential states": (1) the first atom is excited, the second one is in the ground state, and no photon is present, (2) the first atom is in its ground state, the second one is excited, and no photon is present, (3) both atoms are in their ground states and a photon is present, and (4) both atoms are excited and a photon is also present. The system is initially in state (1). The probabilities of each atom being excited are calculated for both the minimally-coupled interaction and the multipolar interaction in the electric dipole approximation. For the minimally-coupled interaction Hamiltonian, the second atom has a probability of being instantaneously excited, so the interaction is not retarded. For the multipolar interaction Hamiltonian, the second atom is not excited before the retardation time, which agrees with special relativity. For the minimally-coupled interaction the nonphysical result occurs because the unperturbed Hamiltonian is not the energy operator in the Coulomb gauge. For the multipolar Hamiltonian in the electric dipole approximation the unperturbed Hamiltonian is the energy operator. An active view of unitary transformations in nonrelativistic quantum electrodynamics is used to derive transformation laws for the potentials of the electromagnetic field and the static Coulomb potential. For a specific choice of unitary transformation the transformation laws for the potentials are used in the minimally-coupled second-quantized Hamiltonian to obtain the multipolar Hamiltonian, which is expressed in terms of the quantized electric and magnetic fields.

•May 1, 1987•0 citations

The interaction of light with neutral systems

Edwin Albert Power, R. Shail

A recent investigation of the interaction between the Maxwell radiation field and neutral atoms or molecules has led us to consider the relation between the straightforward interaction Hamiltonian between particle (k) and the radiation field, and the more physical, and explicitly gauge invariant, couplings of the form q. E and µ. H, etc., where q and µ are the electric and magnetic dipole moments of a system of particles. That these latter form of interaction energies follow from well-formulated approximations for atoms in external fields has been known for many years (Goeppert-Mayer(1); see also Rosenfeld(2)). When the Maxwell field is an internal and dynamical field further discussion is necessary, especially concerning the Coulomb interactions. Their advantage has recently been shown in dealing with dipole interactions in the long range Van der Waals force between two neutral systems where the complete coupling, in dipole approximation, is given by — q.ET for each neutral system, where ET is the transverse electric field. The short-range London limit is contained in this coupling despite the absence of longitudinal electric fields (Power and Zienau (3)). In this note we extend these arguments to higher electric multipoles and magnetic multipoles. We also demonstrate their use in the quantum theory of scattering of light, and in particular the derivations of Stephen (4) of the phase angle between emergent beams in optical double refraction phenomena are shown to follow immediately.

Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society•Jan 1, 1959•12 citations

Electrodynamics in the presence of sources

G. Compagno, Roberto Passante, Franco Persico

Introduction . In the previous chapter we have obtained the form of the coupling between matter and the electromagnetic field. We are thus in a position to treat electrodynamics in the presence of charges and currents. We start by obtaining the Euler-Lagrange equations of the matter-electromagnetic field system. These turn out to be the Maxwell-Lorentz equations, which is a set of coupled equations of motion in which the matter field acts as a source for the electromagnetic field and vice versa. In Section 4.2 we derive the Hamiltonian of the complete system in the Coulomb gauge, and this leads to the so-called minimal coupling Hamiltonian, containing both the electromagnetic potential and the matter-field amplitude. Specializing the nonrelativistic matter field to the case of a neutral atom, consisting of the field of electrons in a static nuclear potential, in Section 4.3 we obtain the atom-photon Hamiltonian in the minimal coupling scheme. Some of the basic processes induced by the atom-photon interaction part of the Hamiltonian are also discussed in this section. This gives us the possibility of introducing at this stage a fundamental simplification of the interaction Hamiltonian, namely the electric dipole approximation. The minimal coupling scheme, however, is not the only possible atom-field coupling.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Aug 3, 1995•0 citations

Quantum Mechanical Analysis of the Interaction of Laser Radiation with Electric Dipole Resonances

Robert P. Lucht

The subject of this chapter is the quantum mechanical analysis of the interaction of electromagnetic radiation with atomic transitions. The analysis is based on the Schrödinger wave equation, and in the first section, the gauge-invariant form of the external electromagnetic field is introduced. The electric dipole interaction and the long-wavelength approximation for the analysis of this interaction are discussed. The perturbative analysis of both single-photon and two-photon electric dipole interactions is presented, and density matrix analysis is introduced. The interaction of radiation with the resonances of atomic hydrogen is then discussed. The analysis is performed for both coupled and uncoupled representations. In the last section of the chapter, the radiative interactions for multielectron atoms are discussed. The Wigner–Eckart theorem and selection rules for transitions between levels characterized by coupling are developed. The effect of hyperfine splitting on radiative transitions is also briefly discussed.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Dec 12, 2024•0 citations
The interaction of an atomic system with an externally applied electromagnetic field can be treated in the electric dipole approximation by means of either the minimal coupling (p · A) or direct coupling (d · E) Hamiltonian. It is shown that both methods lead to identical and unambiguous predictions for observable quantities as long as the atomic wavefunctions are transformed when used in the minimal-coupling formulation. The physical meaning of kinetic momentum is used to show that the atomic states must be described by wavefunctions calculated in the absence of an electromagnetic field when using the d · E (but not the p · A) form of the interaction Hamiltonian. When, however, observables are calculated using the common approximations of resonance atomic physics – the two-level approximation and the rotatingwave approximation – the two formulations can lead to measurably different results. This point is illustrated by calculating the induced polarization (and hence the refractive index) of an atomic system for the two exactly soluble cases of the harmonic oscillator and the hydrogen atom.
The two basic interaction Hamiltonians for the quantum optical problems, namely the so-called minimal coupling one (p.A) and the multipolar one (d.E) are studied in the dipole approximation. The rigorous and exactly solvable model of an oscillator interacting with the electromagnetic field is employed. The Power-Zienau transformation is discussed. It is concluded that both Hamiltonians lead to the same S-matrix. The existence of an example like the one studied in this paper can be treated as support for the formal proofs given in the literature, which show that both Hamiltonians lead to the same predictions in the case of the more realistic description of the interaction of atoms with photons.
The equations of motion and the class of Hamiltonians for electrodynamics, both classical and quantal, are considered for the interaction of radiation with bound charges within the electric-dipole approximation. It is emphasized that, despite the uniqueness of the equations of motion for physical variables, the form of the Hamiltonian is not unique and that a physical system is associated with an equivalence class of Hamiltonians. Two of the members of this class are the minimal-coupling and multipolar forms extensively used in quantum optics. It is shown that although different choices of Hamiltonians lead to different first-order equations of motion that connect canonical coordinates and momenta, they lead to the same second-order equations of motion for the physical variables and physical electromagnetic fields. In the quantum theory of electrodynamics the role played by the choice of representation for the operators and for the states is analyzed with care. The choice of representation leads to a freedom additional to that provided by canonical transformations in classical electrodyamics, although the two lead to the same operator equations of motion.
A pair of nonidentical two-level atoms, separated by a fixed distance R, interact through photon exchange. The system is described by a state vector which is assumed to be a superposition of four "essential states": (1) the first atom is excited, the second one is in the ground state, and no photon is present, (2) the first atom is in its ground state, the second one is excited, and no photon is present, (3) both atoms are in their ground states and a photon is present, and (4) both atoms are excited and a photon is also present. The system is initially in state (1). The probabilities of each atom being excited are calculated for both the minimally-coupled interaction and the multipolar interaction in the electric dipole approximation. For the minimally-coupled interaction Hamiltonian, the second atom has a probability of being instantaneously excited, so the interaction is not retarded. For the multipolar interaction Hamiltonian, the second atom is not excited before the retardation time, which agrees with special relativity. For the minimally-coupled interaction the nonphysical result occurs because the unperturbed Hamiltonian is not the energy operator in the Coulomb gauge. For the multipolar Hamiltonian in the electric dipole approximation the unperturbed Hamiltonian is the energy operator. An active view of unitary transformations in nonrelativistic quantum electrodynamics is used to derive transformation laws for the potentials of the electromagnetic field and the static Coulomb potential. For a specific choice of unitary transformation the transformation laws for the potentials are used in the minimally-coupled second-quantized Hamiltonian to obtain the multipolar Hamiltonian, which is expressed in terms of the quantized electric and magnetic fields.
A recent investigation of the interaction between the Maxwell radiation field and neutral atoms or molecules has led us to consider the relation between the straightforward interaction Hamiltonian between particle (k) and the radiation field, and the more physical, and explicitly gauge invariant, couplings of the form q. E and µ. H, etc., where q and µ are the electric and magnetic dipole moments of a system of particles. That these latter form of interaction energies follow from well-formulated approximations for atoms in external fields has been known for many years (Goeppert-Mayer(1); see also Rosenfeld(2)). When the Maxwell field is an internal and dynamical field further discussion is necessary, especially concerning the Coulomb interactions. Their advantage has recently been shown in dealing with dipole interactions in the long range Van der Waals force between two neutral systems where the complete coupling, in dipole approximation, is given by — q.ET for each neutral system, where ET is the transverse electric field. The short-range London limit is contained in this coupling despite the absence of longitudinal electric fields (Power and Zienau (3)). In this note we extend these arguments to higher electric multipoles and magnetic multipoles. We also demonstrate their use in the quantum theory of scattering of light, and in particular the derivations of Stephen (4) of the phase angle between emergent beams in optical double refraction phenomena are shown to follow immediately.
Introduction . In the previous chapter we have obtained the form of the coupling between matter and the electromagnetic field. We are thus in a position to treat electrodynamics in the presence of charges and currents. We start by obtaining the Euler-Lagrange equations of the matter-electromagnetic field system. These turn out to be the Maxwell-Lorentz equations, which is a set of coupled equations of motion in which the matter field acts as a source for the electromagnetic field and vice versa. In Section 4.2 we derive the Hamiltonian of the complete system in the Coulomb gauge, and this leads to the so-called minimal coupling Hamiltonian, containing both the electromagnetic potential and the matter-field amplitude. Specializing the nonrelativistic matter field to the case of a neutral atom, consisting of the field of electrons in a static nuclear potential, in Section 4.3 we obtain the atom-photon Hamiltonian in the minimal coupling scheme. Some of the basic processes induced by the atom-photon interaction part of the Hamiltonian are also discussed in this section. This gives us the possibility of introducing at this stage a fundamental simplification of the interaction Hamiltonian, namely the electric dipole approximation. The minimal coupling scheme, however, is not the only possible atom-field coupling.
The subject of this chapter is the quantum mechanical analysis of the interaction of electromagnetic radiation with atomic transitions. The analysis is based on the Schrödinger wave equation, and in the first section, the gauge-invariant form of the external electromagnetic field is introduced. The electric dipole interaction and the long-wavelength approximation for the analysis of this interaction are discussed. The perturbative analysis of both single-photon and two-photon electric dipole interactions is presented, and density matrix analysis is introduced. The interaction of radiation with the resonances of atomic hydrogen is then discussed. The analysis is performed for both coupled and uncoupled representations. In the last section of the chapter, the radiative interactions for multielectron atoms are discussed. The Wigner–Eckart theorem and selection rules for transitions between levels characterized by coupling are developed. The effect of hyperfine splitting on radiative transitions is also briefly discussed.