Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society

The interaction of light with neutral systems

Edwin Albert Power, R. Shail

Published Jan 1, 1959• 12 citations
Publisher

Abstract

A recent investigation of the interaction between the Maxwell radiation field and neutral atoms or molecules has led us to consider the relation between the straightforward interaction Hamiltonian between particle (k) and the radiation field, and the more physical, and explicitly gauge invariant, couplings of the form q. E and µ. H, etc., where q and µ are the electric and magnetic dipole moments of a system of particles. That these latter form of interaction energies follow from well-formulated approximations for atoms in external fields has been known for many years (Goeppert-Mayer(1); see also Rosenfeld(2)). When the Maxwell field is an internal and dynamical field further discussion is necessary, especially concerning the Coulomb interactions. Their advantage has recently been shown in dealing with dipole interactions in the long range Van der Waals force between two neutral systems where the complete coupling, in dipole approximation, is given by — q.ET for each neutral system, where ET is the transverse electric field. The short-range London limit is contained in this coupling despite the absence of longitudinal electric fields (Power and Zienau (3)). In this note we extend these arguments to higher electric multipoles and magnetic multipoles. We also demonstrate their use in the quantum theory of scattering of light, and in particular the derivations of Stephen (4) of the phase angle between emergent beams in optical double refraction phenomena are shown to follow immediately.

DOI
10.1017/s0305004100033727

Related papers

Electrodynamics in the presence of sources

G. Compagno, Roberto Passante, Franco Persico

Introduction . In the previous chapter we have obtained the form of the coupling between matter and the electromagnetic field. We are thus in a position to treat electrodynamics in the presence of charges and currents. We start by obtaining the Euler-Lagrange equations of the matter-electromagnetic field system. These turn out to be the Maxwell-Lorentz equations, which is a set of coupled equations of motion in which the matter field acts as a source for the electromagnetic field and vice versa. In Section 4.2 we derive the Hamiltonian of the complete system in the Coulomb gauge, and this leads to the so-called minimal coupling Hamiltonian, containing both the electromagnetic potential and the matter-field amplitude. Specializing the nonrelativistic matter field to the case of a neutral atom, consisting of the field of electrons in a static nuclear potential, in Section 4.3 we obtain the atom-photon Hamiltonian in the minimal coupling scheme. Some of the basic processes induced by the atom-photon interaction part of the Hamiltonian are also discussed in this section. This gives us the possibility of introducing at this stage a fundamental simplification of the interaction Hamiltonian, namely the electric dipole approximation. The minimal coupling scheme, however, is not the only possible atom-field coupling.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Aug 3, 1995•0 citations

On a generalization of the Power–Zienau–Woolley transformation in quantum electrodynamics and atomic field equations

M. Babiker, Edwin Albert Power, T. Thirunamachandran

Abstract A canonical transformation is performed on the conventional Hamiltonian for the electromagnetic radiation field and an assemblage of neutral molecules in interaction. The new Hamiltonian has interaction energies expressed in terms of the electromagnetic fields alone and these energies have direct physical significance. The terms linear in e are the multipole interactions, both electric and magnetic, and the term quadratic in e is a generalization of the elementary diamagnetic energy shift. The intermolecular Coulomb energies have cancelled with transverse polarization fields in the new Hamiltonian, although the intramolecular Coulomb potentials are left unaffected. The equations of motion that follow from the new Hamiltonian are deduced. They are the so-called atomic-field equations for the Maxwell fields and Schrödinger equation for an electron wave in a transverse electromagnetic field. The former are the microscopic analogues of Maxwell’s equations in a medium (not restricted to dipole polarization fields) and the latter are dependent on the field strengths alone (not explicit functions of the vector potential).

Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A Mathematical and Physical Sciences•Jun 4, 1974•93 citations

Comment on "Electric dipole interaction in quantum optics"

W P Healy

It is shown that Mandel's argument that the electric dipole interaction in quantum electrodynamics is inconsistent with Maxwell's equations relies on the use of the wrong canonical momenta in the multipolar form of the Hamiltonian; the field conjugate to the vector potential in the Coulomb gauge is proportional to the transverse displacement vector and not, as in the minimal-coupling form of the Hamiltonian, to the transverse electric field, and similarly the canonical momenta of the charged particles differ in the two cases. Some consequences of this for time-dependent perturbation theory are discussed.

Physical Review A•Dec 1, 1980•29 citations

Equivalence of interaction Hamiltonians in the electric dipole approximation

Kazimierz Rza̧żewski, Robert W. Boyd

The interaction of an atomic system with an externally applied electromagnetic field can be treated in the electric dipole approximation by means of either the minimal coupling (p · A) or direct coupling (d · E) Hamiltonian. It is shown that both methods lead to identical and unambiguous predictions for observable quantities as long as the atomic wavefunctions are transformed when used in the minimal-coupling formulation. The physical meaning of kinetic momentum is used to show that the atomic states must be described by wavefunctions calculated in the absence of an electromagnetic field when using the d · E (but not the p · A) form of the interaction Hamiltonian. When, however, observables are calculated using the common approximations of resonance atomic physics – the two-level approximation and the rotatingwave approximation – the two formulations can lead to measurably different results. This point is illustrated by calculating the induced polarization (and hence the refractive index) of an atomic system for the two exactly soluble cases of the harmonic oscillator and the hydrogen atom.

Journal of Modern Optics•Mar 15, 2004•62 citations

Generation of artificial magnetic fields using dipole-dipole interactions

Alexandre Cesa, John Martin

In 1996, Lloyd [1] showed that the dynamics of complex many-body quantum systems can be efficiently simulated by quantum computers, an idea first put forward by Manin [2] and further developed by Feynman [3]. Although the first quantum computers of a few qubits have been realised experimentally [4, 5], the advent of scalable quantum computers might take another few decades. An alternative tool in the context of simulation is a highly controllable quantum system able to mimic the dynamics of other complex quantum systems, known as an analog quantum simulator. Cold neutral atoms and trapped ions have been shown to be versatile quantum simulators [6, 7] thanks to their high flexibility, controllability, and scalability. They permit one to study a wide range of problems arising from atomic physics, relativistic quantum physics, or cosmology [8]. Since neutral atoms do not carry any net charge, the simulation of electric and magnetic condensed matter phenomena, such as the spin Hall effect, seems out of reach. To overcome this apparent difficulty, the idea has been proposed to create artificial electromagnetic potentials for neutral atoms based on atom-light interaction [9– 12]. These artificial potentials act on neutral atoms as real electromagnetic potentials act on charged particles. Many works on artificial gauge potentials induced by atom-light interactions adopt a single-particle approach [12]. The predicted potentials are then supposed to be valid for a system of weakly interacting atoms. So far, the consequences of atom-atom interactions on the generation of artificial gauge fields has little been studied. The aim of this work is to study the artificial gauge fields arising from the interaction of two Rydberg atoms driven by a common laser field [13]. In this situation, we show that the combined atom-atom and atom-field interactions give rise to nonuniform, artificial gauge potentials. We identify the mechanism responsible for the emergence of these gauge potentials. Analytical expressions for the latter indicate that the strongest artificial magnetic fields are reached in the regime intermediate between the dipole blockade regime and the regime in which the atoms are sufficiently far apart such that atom-light interaction dominates over atom-atom interactions. We discuss the differences and similarities of artificial gauge fields originating from resonant dipole-dipole [14] and van der Waals [15] interactions. We also give an estimation of experimentally attainable artificial magnetic fields resulting from this mechanism and we discuss their detection through the deflection of the atomic motion. [1] S. Lloyd, Science 273, 1073 (1996). [2] Yu. I. Manin, Computable and uncomputable, Sovetskoye Radio, Moscow, 1980. [3] R. P. Feynman, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 21, 467 (1982). [4] L. DiCarlo, J. M. Chow, J. M. Gambetta, Lev S. Bishop, B. R. Johnson, D. I. Schuster, J. Majer, A. Blais, L. Frunzio, S. M. Girvin, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Nature 460, 240 (2009). [5] N. Xu, J. Zhu, D. Lu, X. Zhou, X. Peng, and J. Du, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 130501 (2012). [6] I. Buluta and F. Nori, Science 326, 108 (2009). [7] I. Bloch, J. Dalibard and S. Nascimbéne, Nature Physics 8, 267 (2012). [8] R. Blatt and C. F. Roos, Nature Physics 8, 277 (2012). [9] G. Juzeliunas and P. Öhberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 033602 (2004). [10] G. Juzeliunas, P. Öhberg, J. Ruseckas, and A. Klein, Phys. Rev. A 71, 053614 (2005). [11] G. Juzeliunas, J. Ruseckas, P. Öhberg, and M. Fleischhauer, Phys. Rev. A 73, 025602 (2006). [12] J. Dalibard, F. Gerbier, G. Juzeliu ̄nas, and P. Öhberg, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 1523 (2011). [13] A. Cesa and J. Martin, Phys. Rev. A 88,062703 (2013). [14] A. Gaëtan, Y. Miroshnychenko, T. Wilk, A. Chotia, M. Viteau, D. Comparat, P. Pillet, A. Browaeys, and P. Grangier, Nature Physics 5, 115 (2009). [15] L. Béguin, A. Vernier, R. Chicireanu, T. Lahaye, and A. Browaeys, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 263201 (2013).

•Jun 23, 2014•0 citations

Introduction

V. I. Balykin, Vladilen S Letokhov

The term of atom optics is due to the natural analogy with light optics or the optics of photons. Some elements of the optics of atoms and molecules, based on the interaction between spatially nonuniform static magnetic or electrical fields and the magnetic or electrical dipole moment of the particles, have long been known and used fairly successfully in experimental physics. In the presence of a magnetic or electric field, the quantum state of atom or molecule is shifted, the shift depending on the initial quantum state of the particle and the field strength. A particle in nonuniform magnetic field is acted upon by the force directed along the field strength gradient. The focusing properties of a magnetic lens depend on the magnetic sublevel of atoms.

CRC Press eBooks•Apr 23, 2020•0 citations
A recent investigation of the interaction between the Maxwell radiation field and neutral atoms or molecules has led us to consider the relation between the straightforward interaction Hamiltonian between particle (k) and the radiation field, and the more physical, and explicitly gauge invariant, couplings of the form q. E and µ. H, etc., where q and µ are the electric and magnetic dipole moments of a system of particles. That these latter form of interaction energies follow from well-formulated approximations for atoms in external fields has been known for many years (Goeppert-Mayer(1); see also Rosenfeld(2)). When the Maxwell field is an internal and dynamical field further discussion is necessary, especially concerning the Coulomb interactions. Their advantage has recently been shown in dealing with dipole interactions in the long range Van der Waals force between two neutral systems where the complete coupling, in dipole approximation, is given by — q.ET for each neutral system, where ET is the transverse electric field. The short-range London limit is contained in this coupling despite the absence of longitudinal electric fields (Power and Zienau (3)). In this note we extend these arguments to higher electric multipoles and magnetic multipoles. We also demonstrate their use in the quantum theory of scattering of light, and in particular the derivations of Stephen (4) of the phase angle between emergent beams in optical double refraction phenomena are shown to follow immediately.
Introduction . In the previous chapter we have obtained the form of the coupling between matter and the electromagnetic field. We are thus in a position to treat electrodynamics in the presence of charges and currents. We start by obtaining the Euler-Lagrange equations of the matter-electromagnetic field system. These turn out to be the Maxwell-Lorentz equations, which is a set of coupled equations of motion in which the matter field acts as a source for the electromagnetic field and vice versa. In Section 4.2 we derive the Hamiltonian of the complete system in the Coulomb gauge, and this leads to the so-called minimal coupling Hamiltonian, containing both the electromagnetic potential and the matter-field amplitude. Specializing the nonrelativistic matter field to the case of a neutral atom, consisting of the field of electrons in a static nuclear potential, in Section 4.3 we obtain the atom-photon Hamiltonian in the minimal coupling scheme. Some of the basic processes induced by the atom-photon interaction part of the Hamiltonian are also discussed in this section. This gives us the possibility of introducing at this stage a fundamental simplification of the interaction Hamiltonian, namely the electric dipole approximation. The minimal coupling scheme, however, is not the only possible atom-field coupling.
Abstract A canonical transformation is performed on the conventional Hamiltonian for the electromagnetic radiation field and an assemblage of neutral molecules in interaction. The new Hamiltonian has interaction energies expressed in terms of the electromagnetic fields alone and these energies have direct physical significance. The terms linear in e are the multipole interactions, both electric and magnetic, and the term quadratic in e is a generalization of the elementary diamagnetic energy shift. The intermolecular Coulomb energies have cancelled with transverse polarization fields in the new Hamiltonian, although the intramolecular Coulomb potentials are left unaffected. The equations of motion that follow from the new Hamiltonian are deduced. They are the so-called atomic-field equations for the Maxwell fields and Schrödinger equation for an electron wave in a transverse electromagnetic field. The former are the microscopic analogues of Maxwell’s equations in a medium (not restricted to dipole polarization fields) and the latter are dependent on the field strengths alone (not explicit functions of the vector potential).
It is shown that Mandel's argument that the electric dipole interaction in quantum electrodynamics is inconsistent with Maxwell's equations relies on the use of the wrong canonical momenta in the multipolar form of the Hamiltonian; the field conjugate to the vector potential in the Coulomb gauge is proportional to the transverse displacement vector and not, as in the minimal-coupling form of the Hamiltonian, to the transverse electric field, and similarly the canonical momenta of the charged particles differ in the two cases. Some consequences of this for time-dependent perturbation theory are discussed.
The interaction of an atomic system with an externally applied electromagnetic field can be treated in the electric dipole approximation by means of either the minimal coupling (p · A) or direct coupling (d · E) Hamiltonian. It is shown that both methods lead to identical and unambiguous predictions for observable quantities as long as the atomic wavefunctions are transformed when used in the minimal-coupling formulation. The physical meaning of kinetic momentum is used to show that the atomic states must be described by wavefunctions calculated in the absence of an electromagnetic field when using the d · E (but not the p · A) form of the interaction Hamiltonian. When, however, observables are calculated using the common approximations of resonance atomic physics – the two-level approximation and the rotatingwave approximation – the two formulations can lead to measurably different results. This point is illustrated by calculating the induced polarization (and hence the refractive index) of an atomic system for the two exactly soluble cases of the harmonic oscillator and the hydrogen atom.
In 1996, Lloyd [1] showed that the dynamics of complex many-body quantum systems can be efficiently simulated by quantum computers, an idea first put forward by Manin [2] and further developed by Feynman [3]. Although the first quantum computers of a few qubits have been realised experimentally [4, 5], the advent of scalable quantum computers might take another few decades. An alternative tool in the context of simulation is a highly controllable quantum system able to mimic the dynamics of other complex quantum systems, known as an analog quantum simulator. Cold neutral atoms and trapped ions have been shown to be versatile quantum simulators [6, 7] thanks to their high flexibility, controllability, and scalability. They permit one to study a wide range of problems arising from atomic physics, relativistic quantum physics, or cosmology [8]. Since neutral atoms do not carry any net charge, the simulation of electric and magnetic condensed matter phenomena, such as the spin Hall effect, seems out of reach. To overcome this apparent difficulty, the idea has been proposed to create artificial electromagnetic potentials for neutral atoms based on atom-light interaction [9– 12]. These artificial potentials act on neutral atoms as real electromagnetic potentials act on charged particles. Many works on artificial gauge potentials induced by atom-light interactions adopt a single-particle approach [12]. The predicted potentials are then supposed to be valid for a system of weakly interacting atoms. So far, the consequences of atom-atom interactions on the generation of artificial gauge fields has little been studied. The aim of this work is to study the artificial gauge fields arising from the interaction of two Rydberg atoms driven by a common laser field [13]. In this situation, we show that the combined atom-atom and atom-field interactions give rise to nonuniform, artificial gauge potentials. We identify the mechanism responsible for the emergence of these gauge potentials. Analytical expressions for the latter indicate that the strongest artificial magnetic fields are reached in the regime intermediate between the dipole blockade regime and the regime in which the atoms are sufficiently far apart such that atom-light interaction dominates over atom-atom interactions. We discuss the differences and similarities of artificial gauge fields originating from resonant dipole-dipole [14] and van der Waals [15] interactions. We also give an estimation of experimentally attainable artificial magnetic fields resulting from this mechanism and we discuss their detection through the deflection of the atomic motion. [1] S. Lloyd, Science 273, 1073 (1996). [2] Yu. I. Manin, Computable and uncomputable, Sovetskoye Radio, Moscow, 1980. [3] R. P. Feynman, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 21, 467 (1982). [4] L. DiCarlo, J. M. Chow, J. M. Gambetta, Lev S. Bishop, B. R. Johnson, D. I. Schuster, J. Majer, A. Blais, L. Frunzio, S. M. Girvin, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Nature 460, 240 (2009). [5] N. Xu, J. Zhu, D. Lu, X. Zhou, X. Peng, and J. Du, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 130501 (2012). [6] I. Buluta and F. Nori, Science 326, 108 (2009). [7] I. Bloch, J. Dalibard and S. Nascimbéne, Nature Physics 8, 267 (2012). [8] R. Blatt and C. F. Roos, Nature Physics 8, 277 (2012). [9] G. Juzeliunas and P. Öhberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 033602 (2004). [10] G. Juzeliunas, P. Öhberg, J. Ruseckas, and A. Klein, Phys. Rev. A 71, 053614 (2005). [11] G. Juzeliunas, J. Ruseckas, P. Öhberg, and M. Fleischhauer, Phys. Rev. A 73, 025602 (2006). [12] J. Dalibard, F. Gerbier, G. Juzeliu ̄nas, and P. Öhberg, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 1523 (2011). [13] A. Cesa and J. Martin, Phys. Rev. A 88,062703 (2013). [14] A. Gaëtan, Y. Miroshnychenko, T. Wilk, A. Chotia, M. Viteau, D. Comparat, P. Pillet, A. Browaeys, and P. Grangier, Nature Physics 5, 115 (2009). [15] L. Béguin, A. Vernier, R. Chicireanu, T. Lahaye, and A. Browaeys, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 263201 (2013).
The term of atom optics is due to the natural analogy with light optics or the optics of photons. Some elements of the optics of atoms and molecules, based on the interaction between spatially nonuniform static magnetic or electrical fields and the magnetic or electrical dipole moment of the particles, have long been known and used fairly successfully in experimental physics. In the presence of a magnetic or electric field, the quantum state of atom or molecule is shifted, the shift depending on the initial quantum state of the particle and the field strength. A particle in nonuniform magnetic field is acted upon by the force directed along the field strength gradient. The focusing properties of a magnetic lens depend on the magnetic sublevel of atoms.