Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Journal of the Optical Society of America B

Further remarks on the Hamiltonian of quantum optics

Edwin Albert Power, T. Thirunamachandran

Published Jul 1, 1985• 18 citations
Publisher

Abstract

The equations of motion and the class of Hamiltonians for electrodynamics, both classical and quantal, are considered for the interaction of radiation with bound charges within the electric-dipole approximation. It is emphasized that, despite the uniqueness of the equations of motion for physical variables, the form of the Hamiltonian is not unique and that a physical system is associated with an equivalence class of Hamiltonians. Two of the members of this class are the minimal-coupling and multipolar forms extensively used in quantum optics. It is shown that although different choices of Hamiltonians lead to different first-order equations of motion that connect canonical coordinates and momenta, they lead to the same second-order equations of motion for the physical variables and physical electromagnetic fields. In the quantum theory of electrodynamics the role played by the choice of representation for the operators and for the states is analyzed with care. The choice of representation leads to a freedom additional to that provided by canonical transformations in classical electrodyamics, although the two lead to the same operator equations of motion.

DOI
10.1364/josab.2.001100

Related papers

Comment on "Electric dipole interaction in quantum optics"

W P Healy

It is shown that Mandel's argument that the electric dipole interaction in quantum electrodynamics is inconsistent with Maxwell's equations relies on the use of the wrong canonical momenta in the multipolar form of the Hamiltonian; the field conjugate to the vector potential in the Coulomb gauge is proportional to the transverse displacement vector and not, as in the minimal-coupling form of the Hamiltonian, to the transverse electric field, and similarly the canonical momenta of the charged particles differ in the two cases. Some consequences of this for time-dependent perturbation theory are discussed.

Physical Review A•Dec 1, 1980•29 citations

On the nature of the Hamiltonian for the interaction of radiation with atoms and molecules: (e/m c)p⋅A, −μ⋅E, and all that

Edwin Albert Power, T. Thirunamachandran

In nonrelativistic quantum electrodynamics there is a class of equivalent Hamiltonians that describe a system of radiation and atoms or molecules in interaction. Three specific examples, namely, the minimal coupling, the multipolar, and the space-translated forms are analyzed here in detail. Their equivalence is demonstrated. The Lagrangian approach has also been examined to give further insight into the dynamics. The equations of motion are compared. Finally, the process of two-photon absorption by an atom is used as an application of the various interaction Hamiltonians in a discussion of their computational differences.

American Journal of Physics•Apr 1, 1978•112 citations

Comment on "Maxwell's equations in the multipolar representation"

W P Healy

It is shown that Haller's interpretation of the unitary transformation from the minimalcoupling to the multipolar form of the Hamiltonian in nonrelativistic quantum electrodynamics not only conflicts with the Maxwell-Lorentz equations but also ascribes a special status to the minimal-coupling Hamiltonian which is not warranted by the general method of canonical quantization. The correct interpretation of the transformation as the quantum analog of a classical canonical transformation is reiterated. It is also shown that the transformation is equivalent to a gauge transformation of the electromagnetic potentials.

Physical Review A•Sep 1, 1982•14 citations

Time dependence of operators in minimal and multipolar nonrelativistic quantum electrodynamics. II. Analysis of the functional forms of operators in the two frameworks

Edwin Albert Power, T. Thirunamachandran

The relationship between the multipolar and minimal Hamiltonians through a canonical transformation is used to analyze the time dependence of quantum operators in the two formalisms. It is shown that operators dependent on particle position, the vector potential, and their time derivatives have the same time dependence. However, operators such as the photon number and the atomic population number evolve differently in the two cases. Expressions correct to second order in the electric-dipole moments for these are given. The expectation values of the photon number operator are calculated in the two formalisms and are used to predict natural line shapes. These theoretical shapes differ. The observed shape will depend on the particular setup of the experiment involving the radiative decay of an excited atom. A comparison with the theoretical predictions will determine which of the two frameworks is most appropriate to describe the decay. Finally, the energy density of the electromagnetic field in the neighborhood of an atom is calculated within the two formalisms.

Physical Review A•Dec 1, 1999•17 citations

THE MULTIPOLE EXPANSION IN QUANTUM THEORY

Jan Fiutak

The Hamiltonian of a system of charged particles interacting with the electromagnetic field is investigated. For an arbitrary system the multipole expansion of the interaction between the system and the field is derived by means of a suitable canonical transformation. The transformed Hamiltonian is obtained from the Hamiltonian of the system by replacing the momenta by the transformed kinetic momenta and by adding to the Hamiltonian a term representing the interaction of the system with the electric component of the field. By expanding this interaction term, as well as the transformed momenta, in powers of the dimension of the system over the wavelength, the multipole expansion of the Hamiltonian is obtained. For a system interacting with a classical field the multipole form of the Hamiltonian is exactly equivalent to the original Hamiltonian. For a quantized field this is not true, and the multipole form of the transformed Hamiltonian is shown to be equivalent to the original Hamiltonian only for first-order radiation processes.

Canadian Journal of Physics•Jan 1, 1963•123 citations

Gauge and unitary transformations in multipolar quantum optics

M. Babiker

Multipolar quantum optics deals with the interaction of light with matter as a many-body bound system of charged particles where the coupling to electromagnetic fields is in terms of the multipolar electric polarization and magnetization. We describe two transformations applied to the conventional non-relativistic formalism, namely a gauge transformation applied directly to the fields at the Lagrangian stage and a unitary transformation applied to the old Hamiltonian. We show how such transformations lead to the same Power-Zienau-Woolley (PZW) formulation of the quantum electrodynamics (QED) of an overall electrically neutral many-body bound system of charges, including the internal motion as well as the gross dynamics of the centre of mass. Besides highlighting the utility of the multipolar formalism as a reliable and convenient platform in dealing with optical processes in atomic and molecular physics, it is shown how the analysis can also lead to the identification of the Röntgen effect arising from the gross motion of an electric dipole moment in a magnetic field and the Aharonov-Casher effect due to the motion of a magnetic dipole moment in an electric field. The importance of the two effects is pointed out in both experimental and theoretical contexts.This article is part of the theme issue 'The quantum theory of light'.

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences•Dec 24, 2024•0 citations
The equations of motion and the class of Hamiltonians for electrodynamics, both classical and quantal, are considered for the interaction of radiation with bound charges within the electric-dipole approximation. It is emphasized that, despite the uniqueness of the equations of motion for physical variables, the form of the Hamiltonian is not unique and that a physical system is associated with an equivalence class of Hamiltonians. Two of the members of this class are the minimal-coupling and multipolar forms extensively used in quantum optics. It is shown that although different choices of Hamiltonians lead to different first-order equations of motion that connect canonical coordinates and momenta, they lead to the same second-order equations of motion for the physical variables and physical electromagnetic fields. In the quantum theory of electrodynamics the role played by the choice of representation for the operators and for the states is analyzed with care. The choice of representation leads to a freedom additional to that provided by canonical transformations in classical electrodyamics, although the two lead to the same operator equations of motion.
It is shown that Mandel's argument that the electric dipole interaction in quantum electrodynamics is inconsistent with Maxwell's equations relies on the use of the wrong canonical momenta in the multipolar form of the Hamiltonian; the field conjugate to the vector potential in the Coulomb gauge is proportional to the transverse displacement vector and not, as in the minimal-coupling form of the Hamiltonian, to the transverse electric field, and similarly the canonical momenta of the charged particles differ in the two cases. Some consequences of this for time-dependent perturbation theory are discussed.
In nonrelativistic quantum electrodynamics there is a class of equivalent Hamiltonians that describe a system of radiation and atoms or molecules in interaction. Three specific examples, namely, the minimal coupling, the multipolar, and the space-translated forms are analyzed here in detail. Their equivalence is demonstrated. The Lagrangian approach has also been examined to give further insight into the dynamics. The equations of motion are compared. Finally, the process of two-photon absorption by an atom is used as an application of the various interaction Hamiltonians in a discussion of their computational differences.
It is shown that Haller's interpretation of the unitary transformation from the minimalcoupling to the multipolar form of the Hamiltonian in nonrelativistic quantum electrodynamics not only conflicts with the Maxwell-Lorentz equations but also ascribes a special status to the minimal-coupling Hamiltonian which is not warranted by the general method of canonical quantization. The correct interpretation of the transformation as the quantum analog of a classical canonical transformation is reiterated. It is also shown that the transformation is equivalent to a gauge transformation of the electromagnetic potentials.
The relationship between the multipolar and minimal Hamiltonians through a canonical transformation is used to analyze the time dependence of quantum operators in the two formalisms. It is shown that operators dependent on particle position, the vector potential, and their time derivatives have the same time dependence. However, operators such as the photon number and the atomic population number evolve differently in the two cases. Expressions correct to second order in the electric-dipole moments for these are given. The expectation values of the photon number operator are calculated in the two formalisms and are used to predict natural line shapes. These theoretical shapes differ. The observed shape will depend on the particular setup of the experiment involving the radiative decay of an excited atom. A comparison with the theoretical predictions will determine which of the two frameworks is most appropriate to describe the decay. Finally, the energy density of the electromagnetic field in the neighborhood of an atom is calculated within the two formalisms.
The Hamiltonian of a system of charged particles interacting with the electromagnetic field is investigated. For an arbitrary system the multipole expansion of the interaction between the system and the field is derived by means of a suitable canonical transformation. The transformed Hamiltonian is obtained from the Hamiltonian of the system by replacing the momenta by the transformed kinetic momenta and by adding to the Hamiltonian a term representing the interaction of the system with the electric component of the field. By expanding this interaction term, as well as the transformed momenta, in powers of the dimension of the system over the wavelength, the multipole expansion of the Hamiltonian is obtained. For a system interacting with a classical field the multipole form of the Hamiltonian is exactly equivalent to the original Hamiltonian. For a quantized field this is not true, and the multipole form of the transformed Hamiltonian is shown to be equivalent to the original Hamiltonian only for first-order radiation processes.
Multipolar quantum optics deals with the interaction of light with matter as a many-body bound system of charged particles where the coupling to electromagnetic fields is in terms of the multipolar electric polarization and magnetization. We describe two transformations applied to the conventional non-relativistic formalism, namely a gauge transformation applied directly to the fields at the Lagrangian stage and a unitary transformation applied to the old Hamiltonian. We show how such transformations lead to the same Power-Zienau-Woolley (PZW) formulation of the quantum electrodynamics (QED) of an overall electrically neutral many-body bound system of charges, including the internal motion as well as the gross dynamics of the centre of mass. Besides highlighting the utility of the multipolar formalism as a reliable and convenient platform in dealing with optical processes in atomic and molecular physics, it is shown how the analysis can also lead to the identification of the Röntgen effect arising from the gross motion of an electric dipole moment in a magnetic field and the Aharonov-Casher effect due to the motion of a magnetic dipole moment in an electric field. The importance of the two effects is pointed out in both experimental and theoretical contexts.This article is part of the theme issue 'The quantum theory of light'.