Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics

One-Dimensional Tunnel-Junction Formula for the Schrödinger Particle

Masao Hirokawa, Takuya Kosaka

Published Jan 1, 2013• 3 citations
Publisher

Abstract

We handle all the self-adjoint extensions of the minimal Schrödinger operator for the nonrelativistic electron living in the one-dimensional configuration space with a junction. We are interested in every boundary condition corresponding to the individual self-adjoint extension. Thus, we clarify all the types of those boundary conditions of the wave functions of the nonrelativistic electron. We find concrete tunnel-junction formulae for the nonrelativistic electron passing through the junction, which reveals the phase factor caused by the tunneling through the junction. Using this tunnel-junction formula, we propose a mathematical possibility of a tunnel-junction device for qubit.

DOI
10.1137/130929072

Related papers

One-Dimensional Tunnel-Junction Formula for Schrodinger Particle

Masao Hirokawa, Takuya Kosaka

We handle all the self-adjoint extensions of the minimal Schroedinger operator for the non-relativistic electron living in the one-dimensional configuration space with a junction. We are interested in every boundary condition corresponding to the individual self-adjoint extension. Thus, we clarify all the types of those boundary conditions of the wave functions of the non-relativistic electron. We find a tunnel-junction formula for the non-relativistic electron passing through the junction. Using this tunnel-junction formula, we propose a mathematical possibility of a tunnel-junction device for qubit.

arXiv:1307.3740•Jul 14, 2013•0 citations

Role of a phase factor in the boundary condition of a one-dimensional junction

Yoshiyuki Furuhashi, Masao Hirokawa, Kazumitsu Nakahara +1 more

One-dimensional quantum systems can be experimentally studied in recent nanotechnology like the carbon nanotube and the nanowire. We have considered the mathematical model of a one-dimensional Schrödinger particle with a junction and have analyzed the phase factor in the boundary condition of the junction. We have shown that the phase factor in the tunneling case appears in the situation of the non-adiabatic transition with the three energy levels in the exact Wentzel–Kramers–Brillouin analysis.

arXiv:1001.4319•Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical•Aug 12, 2010•7 citations

Tunneling through a singular potential barrier

J. Dittrich, Pavel Exner

Quantum tunneling of a nonrelativistic particle through a singular potential barrier V is studied on the line. The Hamiltonian is a self-adjoint extension of the operator H1=−d2/dx2+V(x). If H1 is essentially self-adjoint on its natural domain, the tunneling is forbidden for a class of potentials that includes all semiclassically impenetrable barriers. If H1 is not essentially self-adjoint, the Friedrichs extension of H1 yields no tunneling for another class of potentials which again includes the semiclassically impenetrable ones. In general, the occurrence of tunneling is not excluded and depends on the self-adjoint extension we choose as the Hamiltonian of our problem. As an example, we evaluate the transmission coefficient for all self-adjoint extensions of the operator H1 referring to V(x)=gx−2 with 0<g< 3/4 .

Journal of Mathematical Physics•Aug 1, 1985•56 citations

Boundary Conditions in One-dimensional Tunneling Junction

Yutaka Shikano, Masao Hirokawa

The tunneling effect is first characterized in quantum mechanics. However, the mathematical analysis for the tunneling effect is so complicated. In the conventional sense, the WKB analysis is useful to analyze such effect. Here, we consider the mathematical analysis for the tunneling effect in the one-dimensional Schrödinger system from the viewpoint of functional analysis. From the rigorous analysis, we obtain the interference pattern of the tunneling particle.

Journal of Physics Conference Series•Jul 20, 2011•4 citations

Modelling Josephson Junctions with Boundary Conditions: Towards High-Fidelity Models for Superconducting Qubits

Luis Bueno Blanco, Juan Manuel Pérez-Pardo

Josephson junctions are the central nonlinear element of superconducting qubits, yet their standard description is reached through a chain of approximations. We propose a purely quantum-mechanical model of the junction, formulated directly in Hilbert space: a charged particle moves on a one-dimensional loop, and the junction is a point at which the wave function obeys self-adjoint boundary conditions, labelled by a coupling strength $λ$, which controls the transparency of the junction, and a phase jump $δ$, which plays the role of the superconducting phase difference. For a loop with a single junction we solve the spectral problem and show that the ground-state momentum expectation, identified with the supercurrent, factorises exactly as $\langle\hat{p}_0\rangle = I_c(δ,λ)\sinδ$. For opaque junctions $I_c$ becomes independent of $δ$ and the first Josephson relation $I=I_c\sinδ$ is recovered; for strongly attractive coupling, where the ground state is bound to the junction, the $\sinδ$ law is also recovered, but with an exponentially suppressed amplitude. For more transparent junctions, however, the model \emph{predicts} deviations from the pure $\sinδ$ law: $I_c$ acquires a dependence on $δ$ already at order $λ^{-2}$, compatible with the higher Josephson harmonics recently found necessary to describe superconducting qubit spectra, and a fully transparent contact yields a current linear in $δ$. When the phase varies in time, a gauge transformation shows that the voltage drop across the junction is proportional to $\dotδ$, so that the second Josephson relation emerges without being imposed. The boundary-condition approach thus reproduces both Josephson relations from first principles and predicts corrections to them, offering a route towards higher-fidelity models of superconducting qubits.

quant-pharXiv:2610.13417•Oct 12, 2026•0 citations

Self-adjoint extensions and spectral analysis in the generalized Kratzer problem

Mario Cesar Baldiotti, Dmitri M Gitman, Igor Viktorovich Tyutin +1 more

We present a mathematically rigorous quantum-mechanical treatment of a one-dimensional non-relativistic motion of a particle in the potential field , For g 2 >0 and g 1 <0, the potential is known as the Kratzer potential V K ( x ) and is usually used to describe molecular energy and structure, interactions between different molecules and interactions between non-bonded atoms. We construct all self-adjoint Schrödinger operators with the potential V ( x ) and represent rigorous solutions of the corresponding spectral problems. Solving the first part of the problem, we use a method of specifying self-adjoint extensions by (asymptotic) self-adjoint boundary conditions. Solving spectral problems, we follow Krein's method of guiding functionals. This work is a continuation of our previous works devoted to the Coulomb, Calogero and Aharonov–Bohm potentials.

arXiv:1009.4903•Physica Scripta•May 25, 2011•11 citations
We handle all the self-adjoint extensions of the minimal Schrödinger operator for the nonrelativistic electron living in the one-dimensional configuration space with a junction. We are interested in every boundary condition corresponding to the individual self-adjoint extension. Thus, we clarify all the types of those boundary conditions of the wave functions of the nonrelativistic electron. We find concrete tunnel-junction formulae for the nonrelativistic electron passing through the junction, which reveals the phase factor caused by the tunneling through the junction. Using this tunnel-junction formula, we propose a mathematical possibility of a tunnel-junction device for qubit.
We handle all the self-adjoint extensions of the minimal Schroedinger operator for the non-relativistic electron living in the one-dimensional configuration space with a junction. We are interested in every boundary condition corresponding to the individual self-adjoint extension. Thus, we clarify all the types of those boundary conditions of the wave functions of the non-relativistic electron. We find a tunnel-junction formula for the non-relativistic electron passing through the junction. Using this tunnel-junction formula, we propose a mathematical possibility of a tunnel-junction device for qubit.
One-dimensional quantum systems can be experimentally studied in recent nanotechnology like the carbon nanotube and the nanowire. We have considered the mathematical model of a one-dimensional Schrödinger particle with a junction and have analyzed the phase factor in the boundary condition of the junction. We have shown that the phase factor in the tunneling case appears in the situation of the non-adiabatic transition with the three energy levels in the exact Wentzel–Kramers–Brillouin analysis.
Quantum tunneling of a nonrelativistic particle through a singular potential barrier V is studied on the line. The Hamiltonian is a self-adjoint extension of the operator H1=−d2/dx2+V(x). If H1 is essentially self-adjoint on its natural domain, the tunneling is forbidden for a class of potentials that includes all semiclassically impenetrable barriers. If H1 is not essentially self-adjoint, the Friedrichs extension of H1 yields no tunneling for another class of potentials which again includes the semiclassically impenetrable ones. In general, the occurrence of tunneling is not excluded and depends on the self-adjoint extension we choose as the Hamiltonian of our problem. As an example, we evaluate the transmission coefficient for all self-adjoint extensions of the operator H1 referring to V(x)=gx−2 with 0<g< 3/4 .
Josephson junctions are the central nonlinear element of superconducting qubits, yet their standard description is reached through a chain of approximations. We propose a purely quantum-mechanical model of the junction, formulated directly in Hilbert space: a charged particle moves on a one-dimensional loop, and the junction is a point at which the wave function obeys self-adjoint boundary conditions, labelled by a coupling strength λλλ, which controls the transparency of the junction, and a phase jump δδδ, which plays the role of the superconducting phase difference. For a loop with a single junction we solve the spectral problem and show that the ground-state momentum expectation, identified with the supercurrent, factorises exactly as ⟨p^0⟩=Ic(δ,λ)sin⁡δ\langle\hat{p}_0\rangle = I_c(δ,λ)\sinδ⟨p^​0​⟩=Ic​(δ,λ)sinδ. For opaque junctions IcI_cIc​ becomes independent of δδδ and the first Josephson relation I=Icsin⁡δI=I_c\sinδI=Ic​sinδ is recovered; for strongly attractive coupling, where the ground state is bound to the junction, the sin⁡δ\sinδsinδ law is also recovered, but with an exponentially suppressed amplitude. For more transparent junctions, however, the model \emph{predicts} deviations from the pure sin⁡δ\sinδsinδ law: IcI_cIc​ acquires a dependence on δδδ already at order λ−2λ^{-2}λ−2, compatible with the higher Josephson harmonics recently found necessary to describe superconducting qubit spectra, and a fully transparent contact yields a current linear in δδδ. When the phase varies in time, a gauge transformation shows that the voltage drop across the junction is proportional to δ˙\dotδδ˙, so that the second Josephson relation emerges without being imposed. The boundary-condition approach thus reproduces both Josephson relations from first principles and predicts corrections to them, offering a route towards higher-fidelity models of superconducting qubits.
We present a mathematically rigorous quantum-mechanical treatment of a one-dimensional non-relativistic motion of a particle in the potential field , For g 2 >0 and g 1 <0, the potential is known as the Kratzer potential V K ( x ) and is usually used to describe molecular energy and structure, interactions between different molecules and interactions between non-bonded atoms. We construct all self-adjoint Schrödinger operators with the potential V ( x ) and represent rigorous solutions of the corresponding spectral problems. Solving the first part of the problem, we use a method of specifying self-adjoint extensions by (asymptotic) self-adjoint boundary conditions. Solving spectral problems, we follow Krein's method of guiding functionals. This work is a continuation of our previous works devoted to the Coulomb, Calogero and Aharonov–Bohm potentials.