Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical Review A

Exactness of modern quantum-mechanical effects

Michael Martin Nieto

Published Jun 1, 1984• 8 citations
Publisher

Abstract

The arguments for the exactness of the quantization effects of modern physics are discussed. Some comments are made on past and possible experiments which combine these quantum effects.Received 6 December 1983DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.29.3413©1984 American Physical Society

DOI
10.1103/physreva.29.3413

Related papers

Why the classical–quantal dualism is still with us

C. H. Woo

Through a series of short steps we try to make clear why the classical–quantal dualism is still indispensable, despite the advances in our understanding of quantum physics.

American Journal of Physics•Oct 1, 1986•3 citations

Comment on "Bell's Theorem: Does the Clauser-Horne Inequality Hold for All Local Theories?"

Michael Horne, Abner Shimony

Received 5 December 1983DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.53.1296©1984 American Physical Society

Physical Review Letters•Sep 24, 1984•5 citations

Chapter 1. The Place of Quantum Mechanics in Modern Physics

Dennis Morris

De Gruyter eBooks•May 27, 2016•0 citations

Wave chaos in quantized classically nonchaotic systems

Petr Šeba, Karol Życzkowski

We discuss the properties of the wave chaos appearing in some quantized systems that are classically not chaotic.Received 10 December 1990DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.44.3457©1991 American Physical Society

Physical Review A•Sep 1, 1991•39 citations

Some Critical Considerations on the Present Epistemological and Scientific Debate on Quantum Mechanics

G. C. Ghirardi

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1988•4 citations

Response to "Comment on `Observer dependence of quantum states in relativistic quantum field theories"'

S. Malin

Professor Bloch's criticism is shown to be based on a misunderstanding. The new results contained in the paper he criticized are briefly summarized and their meaning is clarified.Received 5 December 1983DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.29.1856©1984 American Physical Society

Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields•Apr 15, 1984•3 citations
The arguments for the exactness of the quantization effects of modern physics are discussed. Some comments are made on past and possible experiments which combine these quantum effects.Received 6 December 1983DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.29.3413©1984 American Physical Society