Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Resonance

States of physical systems in classical and quantum mechanics

K. S. Mallesh, S. Chaturvedi, R. Simon, Narasimhaiengar Mukunda

Published Jan 1, 2012• 4 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/s12045-012-0007-x

Related papers

Classical systems and observables in quantum mechanics

Holger Neumann

Communications in Mathematical Physics•Jun 1, 1971•17 citations

Quantum correlations and dynamics from classical random fields valued in complex Hilbert spaces

Andrei Yu. Khrennikov

One of the crucial differences between mathematical models of classical and quantum mechanics (QM) is the use of the tensor product of the state spaces of subsystems as the state space of the corresponding composite system. (To describe an ensemble of classical composite systems, one uses random variables taking values in the Cartesian product of the state spaces of subsystems.) We show that, nevertheless, it is possible to establish a natural correspondence between the classical and the quantum probabilistic descriptions of composite systems. Quantum averages for composite systems (including entangled) can be represented as averages with respect to classical random fields. It is essentially what Albert Einstein dreamed of. QM is represented as classical statistical mechanics with infinite-dimensional phase space. While the mathematical construction is completely rigorous, its physical interpretation is a complicated problem. We present the basic physical interpretation of prequantum classical statistical field theory in Sec. II. However, this is only the first step toward real physical theory.

Journal of Mathematical Physics•Aug 1, 2010•11 citations

Classical Systems in Quantum Mechanics

Pavel Bóna

arXiv:1911.02081•Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2020•3 citations

On Classical, Fuzzy Classical, Quantum and Fuzzy Quantum Systems.

Rudolf Seising

In this paper we consider physical systems and the concept of their states in the context of the theory of fuzzy sets and systems. In section 1 we give a brief sketch on the fundamental difference between the theories of classical physics and quantum mechanics. In section 2 and 3 we introduce very shortly systems and their states in classical and quantum mechanics, respectively. Section 4 presents the concept of fuzzy systems. We propose to fuzzify the classical systems in section 5 and quantum systems in section 6. In section 7 we start to consider a fuzzy interpretation of the uncertainty principle.

European Society for Fuzzy Logic and Technology Conference•Jan 1, 2009•0 citations

Transformation Relation of Two Descriptive Systems between Quantum Mechanics and Classical Statistical Mechanics and Dynamic Foundation of Classical Statistical Physics

Mei Xiaochun

Based on the concept of ensemble, it is proved in the manuscript that the probability amplitude function can also been used to describe the classical statistical system. The motion equations of probability amplitude functions of classical statistical system are obtained, which are similar to that in quantum mechanics. It is also proved in the meantime that microsystems that obey quantum mechanics can also be described in the forms of classical statistical mechanics and deterministic classical mechanics. The quantum revised formula of classical interaction force and the revised Liouville's equations are also obtained. In this way, the transformation of two descriptive forms between classical mechanics and quantum mechanics is achieved. A new and rational interpretation about quantum mechanics, including the meaning of wave function, the potential barrier penetration of microparticles, the Uncertainty relation, the wave-particle duality, the essence of spin and the Bell's inequality and so on, is provided in the paper. Based on the transformation, two fundamental hypotheses are put forward as the basic postulates of classical statistical physics. The equal probability hypothesis in the equilibrium states is given up. The united description of nonequilibrium state mechanics and equilibrium state statistical mechanics is reached, and the so-called reversibility paradox can also be eliminated.

arXiv:physics/9903030•Mar 17, 1999•0 citations

States in quantum mechanics

L. D. Faddeev, O. Yakubovskiĭ

Student mathematical library•Mar 9, 2009•2 citations
One of the crucial differences between mathematical models of classical and quantum mechanics (QM) is the use of the tensor product of the state spaces of subsystems as the state space of the corresponding composite system. (To describe an ensemble of classical composite systems, one uses random variables taking values in the Cartesian product of the state spaces of subsystems.) We show that, nevertheless, it is possible to establish a natural correspondence between the classical and the quantum probabilistic descriptions of composite systems. Quantum averages for composite systems (including entangled) can be represented as averages with respect to classical random fields. It is essentially what Albert Einstein dreamed of. QM is represented as classical statistical mechanics with infinite-dimensional phase space. While the mathematical construction is completely rigorous, its physical interpretation is a complicated problem. We present the basic physical interpretation of prequantum classical statistical field theory in Sec. II. However, this is only the first step toward real physical theory.
In this paper we consider physical systems and the concept of their states in the context of the theory of fuzzy sets and systems. In section 1 we give a brief sketch on the fundamental difference between the theories of classical physics and quantum mechanics. In section 2 and 3 we introduce very shortly systems and their states in classical and quantum mechanics, respectively. Section 4 presents the concept of fuzzy systems. We propose to fuzzify the classical systems in section 5 and quantum systems in section 6. In section 7 we start to consider a fuzzy interpretation of the uncertainty principle.
Based on the concept of ensemble, it is proved in the manuscript that the probability amplitude function can also been used to describe the classical statistical system. The motion equations of probability amplitude functions of classical statistical system are obtained, which are similar to that in quantum mechanics. It is also proved in the meantime that microsystems that obey quantum mechanics can also be described in the forms of classical statistical mechanics and deterministic classical mechanics. The quantum revised formula of classical interaction force and the revised Liouville's equations are also obtained. In this way, the transformation of two descriptive forms between classical mechanics and quantum mechanics is achieved. A new and rational interpretation about quantum mechanics, including the meaning of wave function, the potential barrier penetration of microparticles, the Uncertainty relation, the wave-particle duality, the essence of spin and the Bell's inequality and so on, is provided in the paper. Based on the transformation, two fundamental hypotheses are put forward as the basic postulates of classical statistical physics. The equal probability hypothesis in the equilibrium states is given up. The united description of nonequilibrium state mechanics and equilibrium state statistical mechanics is reached, and the so-called reversibility paradox can also be eliminated.