The Bohm–Gadella theory, sometimes referred to as the time asymmetric quantum theory of scattering and decay, is based on the Hardy axiom. The Hardy axiom asserts that the solutions of the Lippmann–Schwinger equation are functionals over spaces of Hardy functions. The preparation–registration arrow of time provides the physical justification for the Hardy axiom. In this paper, it is shown that the Hardy axiom is incorrect, because the solutions of the Lippmann–Schwinger equation do not act on spaces of Hardy functions. It is also shown that the derivation of the preparation–registration arrow of time is flawed. Thus, Hardy functions neither appear when we solve the Lippmann–Schwinger equation nor should they appear. It is also shown that the Bohm–Gadella theory does not rest on the same physical principles as quantum mechanics, and that it does not solve any problem that quantum mechanics cannot solve. The Bohm–Gadella theory must therefore be abandoned.
The Bohm-Gadella theory, sometimes referred to as the Time Asymmetric Quantum Theory of Scattering and Decay, is based on the Hardy axiom. The Hardy axiom asserts that the solutions of the Lippmann-Schwinger equation are functionals over spaces of Hardy functions. The preparation-registration arrow of time provides the physical justification for the Hardy axiom. In this paper, it is shown that the Hardy axiom is incorrect, because the solutions of the Lippmann-Schwinger equation do not act on spaces of Hardy functions. It is also shown that the derivation of the preparation-registration arrow of time is flawed. Thus, Hardy functions neither appear when we solve the Lippmann-Schwinger equation nor they should appear. It is also shown that the Bohm-Gadella theory does not rest on the same physical principles as quantum mechanics, and that it does not solve any problem that quantum mechanics cannot solve. The Bohm-Gadella theory must therefore be abandoned.
Traditional Quantum Scattering theory is built upon a Hilbert space formalism. The nature of the Hilbert space has led to a number of ideas about the nature of scattering systems, chief among them being the understanding that the decay of unstable quan- tum systems cannot be purely exponential and that there can only be an approximate relationship between the width Γ of a scattering resonance and the lifetime τ of the resonant state whose formation gives rise to it. That such physical conclusions are de- rived from purely mathematical properties of the underlying topological vector space inform the notion that, in choosing a particular space, one is choosing the mathemat- ical representation of the physical universe for the system. With this notion in mind, purely physical characteristics of quantum systems are used to answer the question: “What is the proper mathematical space for quantum mechanical calculations?” In the particular case of quantum scattering, it is shown that this approach casts the choice of the Hilbert space into doubt and motivates instead the use of rigged Hilbert spaces employing Hardy spaces; in these Hardy rigged Hilbert spaces, exponential decay is permissible and the time evolution of decaying states is governed by semigroups. The original theories concerning deviation from exponential decay in the Hilbert space are revisited to reveal how their conclusions flow from a mathematical property whose physical interpretation is problematic. Finally, an application of a Hardy rigged Hilbert space formalism is presented: Time Asymmetric Quantum Mechanics, as developed by A. Bohm, M. Gadella, and S. Wickramasekara.
The Rigged Hilbert Space (RHS) theory of resonance scattering and decay is reviewed and contrasted with the standard Hilbert space (HS) theory of quantum mechanics. The main difference is in the choice of boundary conditions. Whereas the conventional theory allows for the in-states
ϕ+ and the out-states (observables)
ψ− of the S-matrix elements
(ψ−,ϕ+)=(ψout,Sϕin) any elements of the HS $\H$,
{ψ−}={ϕ+}(=)˝, the RHS theory chooses the boundary conditions~:
ϕ+∈Φ−⊂⊂˝Φ−×,
ψ−∈Φ+⊂⊂˝Φ+×, where
Φ− (
Φ+) are Hardy class spaces associated to the lower (upper) half-plane of the second sheet of the analytically continued S-matrix. This can be phenomenologically justified by causality. The two RHS's for states
ϕ+ and observables
ψ− provide new vectors which are not in $\H$, e.g. the Dirac-Lippmann-Schwinger kets
∣E±∈Φ∓× (solutions of the Lippmann-Schwinger equation with
±iε respectively) and the Gamow vectors
∣ER−iΓ/2±∈Φ∓×. The Gamow vectors
∣ER−iΓ/2− have all the properties that one heuristically needs for quasistable states. In addition, they give rise to asymmetric time evolution expressing irreversibility on the microphysical level.
We review the mathematical tools that are suitable for a formulation of time asymmetry in quantum mechanics. In particular, Hardy functions on a half plane and rigged Hilbert spaces constructed with a subclass of Hardy functions. This time asymmetry often appears in quantum scattering and, in particular, in resonance scattering. We review the construction of Gamow vectors, often considered Gamow states for resonances. A brief summary of the fundamental ideas of time asymmetric quantum mechanics is presented in a last section.