Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/0606186 · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General

On the inconsistency of the Bohm–Gadella theory with quantum mechanics

Rafael de la Madrid

Published Jul 5, 2006• 5 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

The Bohm–Gadella theory, sometimes referred to as the time asymmetric quantum theory of scattering and decay, is based on the Hardy axiom. The Hardy axiom asserts that the solutions of the Lippmann–Schwinger equation are functionals over spaces of Hardy functions. The preparation–registration arrow of time provides the physical justification for the Hardy axiom. In this paper, it is shown that the Hardy axiom is incorrect, because the solutions of the Lippmann–Schwinger equation do not act on spaces of Hardy functions. It is also shown that the derivation of the preparation–registration arrow of time is flawed. Thus, Hardy functions neither appear when we solve the Lippmann–Schwinger equation nor should they appear. It is also shown that the Bohm–Gadella theory does not rest on the same physical principles as quantum mechanics, and that it does not solve any problem that quantum mechanics cannot solve. The Bohm–Gadella theory must therefore be abandoned.

DOI
10.1088/0305-4470/39/29/017

Related papers

On the inconsistency of the Bohm-Gadella theory with quantum mechanics

De la Madrid, R

The Bohm-Gadella theory, sometimes referred to as the Time Asymmetric Quantum Theory of Scattering and Decay, is based on the Hardy axiom. The Hardy axiom asserts that the solutions of the Lippmann-Schwinger equation are functionals over spaces of Hardy functions. The preparation-registration arrow of time provides the physical justification for the Hardy axiom. In this paper, it is shown that the Hardy axiom is incorrect, because the solutions of the Lippmann-Schwinger equation do not act on spaces of Hardy functions. It is also shown that the derivation of the preparation-registration arrow of time is flawed. Thus, Hardy functions neither appear when we solve the Lippmann-Schwinger equation nor they should appear. It is also shown that the Bohm-Gadella theory does not rest on the same physical principles as quantum mechanics, and that it does not solve any problem that quantum mechanics cannot solve. The Bohm-Gadella theory must therefore be abandoned.

•Jun 22, 2006•4 citations

Reply to ‘Comment on ‘On the inconsistency of the Bohm–Gadella theory with quantum mechanics’’

Rafael de la Madrid

In this reply, we show that when we apply standard distribution theory to the Lippmann–Schwinger equation, the resulting spaces of test functions would comply with the Hardy axiom only if classic results of Paley and Wiener, of Gelfand and Shilov, and of the theory of ultradistributions were wrong. Also, we point out several differences between the ‘standard method’ of constructing rigged Hilbert spaces in quantum mechanics and the method used in time asymmetric quantum theory.

arXiv:0704.1613•Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical•Apr 11, 2007•3 citations

Comment on ‘On the inconsistency of the Bohm–Gadella theory with quantum mechanics’

Manuel Gadella, S. Wickramasekara

Rigged Hilbert spaces of Hardy functions lead to a consistent theory of resonance scattering and decay. Contrary to the claims of a recent article [8], the theory holds for a wide range of potentials and rigorously describes the asymmetric time evolution of resonances.

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical•Apr 11, 2007•2 citations

Complex Energies and Beginnings of Time Suggest a Theory of Scattering and Decay

Arno Böhm, Piotr Kielanowski, Sujeewa Wickramasekara

Many useful concepts for a quantum theory of scattering and decay (like Lippmann-Schwinger kets, purely outgoing boundary conditions, exponentially decaying Gamow vectors, causality) are not well defined in the mathematical frame set by the conventional (Hilbert space) axioms of quantum mechanics. Using the Lippmann-Schwinger equations as the takeoff point and aiming for a theory that unites resonances and decay, we conjecture a new axiom for quantum mechanics that distinguishes mathematically between prepared states and detected observables. Suggested by the two signs $\\pm i\\epsilon$ of the Lippmann-Schwinger equations, this axiom replaces the one Hilbert space of conventional quantum mechanics by two Hardy spaces. The new Hardy space theory automatically provides Gamow kets with exponential time evolution derived from the complex poles of the $S$-matrix. It solves the causality problem since it results in a semigroup evolution. But this semigroup brings into quantum physics a new concept of the semigroup time $t=0$, a beginning of time. Its interpretation and observations are discussed in the last section.

•Oct 8, 2005•11 citations

Time Asymmetric Quantum Theory — I Modifying an Axiom of Quantum Physics

A. R. Bohm, Mark Loewe, Bryan Van De Ven

A slight modification of one axiom of quantum theory changes a reversible theory into a time asymmetric theory. Whereas the standard Hilbert space axiom does not distinguish mathematically between the space of states (in-states of scattering theory) and the space of observables (out-“states ” of scattering theory) the new axiom associates states and observables to two different Hardy subspaces which are dense in the same Hilbert space and analytic in the lower and upper complex energy plane, respectively. As a consequence of this new axiom the dynamical equations (Schrödinger or Heisenberg) integrate to a semigroup evolution. Extending this new Hardy space axiom to a relativistic theory provides a relativistic theory of resonance scattering and decay with Born probablilities that fulfill Einstein causality and the exponential decay law. 1 Introduction—Time Asymmetry Time asymmetry, irreversibility, time reversal non-invariance are different concepts and they are (probably) not (all) related to each other [1], [2], [3]. These concepts are usually called arrows-of-time. Time asymmetry comes from time asymmetric boundary conditions of time symmetric equations; its most prominent consequence is causality. The radiation arrow of time is its example from classical physics. Irreversibility

•Jan 1, 2008•23 citations

Resonance and decay phenomena lead to quantum mechanical time asymmetry

Arno Böhm, Hai Viet Bui

The states (Schrödinger picture) and observables (Heisenberg picture) in the standard quantum theory evolve symmetrically in time, given by the unitary group with time extending over − ∞ < t < + ∞ . This time evolution is a mathematical consequence of the Hilbert space boundary condition for the dynamical differential equations. However, this unitary group evolution violates causality. Moreover, it does not solve an old puzzle of Wigner: How does one describe excited states of atoms which decay exponentially, and how is their lifetime τ related to the Lorentzian width Γ? These question can be answered if one replaces the Hilbert space boundary condition by new, Hardy space boundary conditions. These Hardy space boundary conditions allow for a distinction between states (prepared by a preparation apparatus) and observables (detected by a registration apparatus). The new Hardy space quantum theory is time asymmetric, i.e, the time evolution is given by the semigroup with t 0 ≤ t < + ∞ , which predicts a finite "beginning of time" t 0 , where t 0 is the ensemble of time at which each individual system has been prepared. The Hardy space axiom also leads to the new prediction: the width Γ and the lifetime τ are exactly related by τ = ℏ/Γ .

Journal of Physics Conference Series•Apr 5, 2013•1 citation
The Bohm–Gadella theory, sometimes referred to as the time asymmetric quantum theory of scattering and decay, is based on the Hardy axiom. The Hardy axiom asserts that the solutions of the Lippmann–Schwinger equation are functionals over spaces of Hardy functions. The preparation–registration arrow of time provides the physical justification for the Hardy axiom. In this paper, it is shown that the Hardy axiom is incorrect, because the solutions of the Lippmann–Schwinger equation do not act on spaces of Hardy functions. It is also shown that the derivation of the preparation–registration arrow of time is flawed. Thus, Hardy functions neither appear when we solve the Lippmann–Schwinger equation nor should they appear. It is also shown that the Bohm–Gadella theory does not rest on the same physical principles as quantum mechanics, and that it does not solve any problem that quantum mechanics cannot solve. The Bohm–Gadella theory must therefore be abandoned.
The Bohm-Gadella theory, sometimes referred to as the Time Asymmetric Quantum Theory of Scattering and Decay, is based on the Hardy axiom. The Hardy axiom asserts that the solutions of the Lippmann-Schwinger equation are functionals over spaces of Hardy functions. The preparation-registration arrow of time provides the physical justification for the Hardy axiom. In this paper, it is shown that the Hardy axiom is incorrect, because the solutions of the Lippmann-Schwinger equation do not act on spaces of Hardy functions. It is also shown that the derivation of the preparation-registration arrow of time is flawed. Thus, Hardy functions neither appear when we solve the Lippmann-Schwinger equation nor they should appear. It is also shown that the Bohm-Gadella theory does not rest on the same physical principles as quantum mechanics, and that it does not solve any problem that quantum mechanics cannot solve. The Bohm-Gadella theory must therefore be abandoned.
Many useful concepts for a quantum theory of scattering and decay (like Lippmann-Schwinger kets, purely outgoing boundary conditions, exponentially decaying Gamow vectors, causality) are not well defined in the mathematical frame set by the conventional (Hilbert space) axioms of quantum mechanics. Using the Lippmann-Schwinger equations as the takeoff point and aiming for a theory that unites resonances and decay, we conjecture a new axiom for quantum mechanics that distinguishes mathematically between prepared states and detected observables. Suggested by the two signs pmiepsilon\\pm i\\epsilonpmiepsilon of the Lippmann-Schwinger equations, this axiom replaces the one Hilbert space of conventional quantum mechanics by two Hardy spaces. The new Hardy space theory automatically provides Gamow kets with exponential time evolution derived from the complex poles of the SSS-matrix. It solves the causality problem since it results in a semigroup evolution. But this semigroup brings into quantum physics a new concept of the semigroup time t=0t=0t=0, a beginning of time. Its interpretation and observations are discussed in the last section.
A slight modification of one axiom of quantum theory changes a reversible theory into a time asymmetric theory. Whereas the standard Hilbert space axiom does not distinguish mathematically between the space of states (in-states of scattering theory) and the space of observables (out-“states ” of scattering theory) the new axiom associates states and observables to two different Hardy subspaces which are dense in the same Hilbert space and analytic in the lower and upper complex energy plane, respectively. As a consequence of this new axiom the dynamical equations (Schrödinger or Heisenberg) integrate to a semigroup evolution. Extending this new Hardy space axiom to a relativistic theory provides a relativistic theory of resonance scattering and decay with Born probablilities that fulfill Einstein causality and the exponential decay law. 1 Introduction—Time Asymmetry Time asymmetry, irreversibility, time reversal non-invariance are different concepts and they are (probably) not (all) related to each other [1], [2], [3]. These concepts are usually called arrows-of-time. Time asymmetry comes from time asymmetric boundary conditions of time symmetric equations; its most prominent consequence is causality. The radiation arrow of time is its example from classical physics. Irreversibility
The states (Schrödinger picture) and observables (Heisenberg picture) in the standard quantum theory evolve symmetrically in time, given by the unitary group with time extending over − ∞ < t < + ∞ . This time evolution is a mathematical consequence of the Hilbert space boundary condition for the dynamical differential equations. However, this unitary group evolution violates causality. Moreover, it does not solve an old puzzle of Wigner: How does one describe excited states of atoms which decay exponentially, and how is their lifetime τ related to the Lorentzian width Γ? These question can be answered if one replaces the Hilbert space boundary condition by new, Hardy space boundary conditions. These Hardy space boundary conditions allow for a distinction between states (prepared by a preparation apparatus) and observables (detected by a registration apparatus). The new Hardy space quantum theory is time asymmetric, i.e, the time evolution is given by the semigroup with t 0 ≤ t < + ∞ , which predicts a finite "beginning of time" t 0 , where t 0 is the ensemble of time at which each individual system has been prepared. The Hardy space axiom also leads to the new prediction: the width Γ and the lifetime τ are exactly related by τ = ℏ/Γ .