Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Journal of Mathematical Physics

Fractional Schrödinger equation for a particle moving in a potential well

Yuri Luchko

Published Jan 1, 2013• 123 citations
Publisher

Abstract

In this paper, the fractional Schrödinger equation that contains the quantum Riesz fractional derivative instead of the Laplace operator is revisited for the case of a particle moving in the infinite potential well. In the recent papers [M. Jeng, S.-L.-Y. Xu, E. Hawkins, and J. M. Schwarz, “On the nonlocality of the fractional Schrödinger equation,” J. Math. Phys. 51, 062102 (2010)10.1063/1.3430552] and [S. S. Bayin, “On the consistency of the solutions of the space fractional Schrödinger equation,” J. Math. Phys. 53, 042105 (2012)10.1063/1.4705268] published in this journal, controversial opinions regarding solutions to the fractional Schrödinger equation for a particle moving in the infinite potential well that were derived by Laskin [“Fractals and quantum mechanics,” Chaos 10, 780–790 (2000)10.1063/1.1050284] have been given. In this paper, a thorough mathematical treatment of these matters is provided. The problem under consideration is reformulated in terms of three integral equations with the power kernels. Even if the equations look not very complicated, no solution to these equations in explicit form is known. Still, the obtained equations are used to show that the eigenvalues and eigenfunctions of the fractional Schrödinger equation for a particle moving in the infinite potential well given by Laskin [“Fractals and quantum mechanics,” Chaos 10, 780–790 (2000)10.1063/1.1050284] and many other papers by different authors cannot be valid as has been first stated by Jeng et al. [“On the nonlocality of the fractional Schrödinger equation,” J. Math. Phys. 51, 062102 (2010)10.1063/1.3430552].

DOI
10.1063/1.4777472

Related papers

Comment on “On the consistency of the solutions of the space fractional Schrödinger equation” [J. Math. Phys. 53, 042105 (2012)]

Selçuk Ş. Bayın

Hawkins and Schwarz [J. Math. Phys. 54, 014101 (2013)]10.1063/1.4772533 claim that there is a flaw in the way certain integrals are evaluated to show the consistency of the infinite square well solutions of the space fractional Schrödinger equation [S. S. Bayin, J. Math. Phys. 53, 042105 (2012)10.1063/1.4705268; S. S. Bayin, J. Math. Phys. 53, 084101 (2012)]10.1063/1.4739758. We give additional details about how these integrals are evaluated and show that there is no inconsistency for an infinite square well.

Journal of Mathematical Physics•Jul 1, 2013•11 citations

Time Fractional Schrodinger Equation Revisited

B. N. Narahari Achar, Bradley Thomas Yale, John W. Hanneken

The time fractional Schrodinger equation (TFSE) for a nonrelativistic particle is derived on the basis of the Feynman path integral method by extending it initially to the case of a "free particle" obeying fractional dynamics, obtained by replacing the integer order derivatives with respect to time by those of fractional order.The equations of motion contain quantities which have "fractional" dimensions, chosen such that the "energy" has the correct dimension [𝑀𝐿 2 /𝑇 2 ].The action 𝑆 is defined as a fractional time integral of the Lagrangian, and a "fractional Planck constant" is introduced.The TFSE corresponds to a "subdiffusion" equation with an imaginary fractional diffusion constant and reproduces the regular Schrodinger equation in the limit of integer order.The present work corrects a number of errors in Naber's work.The correct continuity equation for the probability density is derived and a Green function solution for the case of a "free particle" is obtained.The total probability for a "free" particle is shown to go to zero in the limit of infinite time, in contrast with Naber's result of a total probability greater than unity.A generalization to the case of a particle moving in a potential is also given.

Advances in Mathematical Physics•Jan 1, 2013•73 citations

The Infinite Square Well Problem in the Standard, Fractional, and Relativistic Quantum Mechanics

Yuchuan Wei

There has been a continuous argument on the correctness of the Laskins solution for the infinite square well problem in the fractional quantum mechanics. In this paper, we prove that the Laskins functions are not amathematical solution to the fractional Schrodinger equation and the equation does not have any nonzero solutions at all in the sense of mathematics. As in the standard quantum mechanics, we view the infinite square well problem as the limit of the finite well problem, and define the solution for the infinite square well problem as the limit of the solution for the finite square well problem. Using the simple property of the infinite operators, we show that Laskins function can be the limit solution for the infinite square well problem. The single-sided well problem and the 3 dimensional well problem are included. This operator method works for the same problems in the relativistic quantum mechanicsas well.

International Journal of Theoretical and Mathematical Physics•Jan 1, 2015•4 citations

Infinite wall in the fractional quantum mechanics

Jianping Dong, Ying Lu

The space-fractional Schrödinger equation for a local potential is difficult to solve because the fractional Riesz operator in it is nonlocal. In fractional quantum mechanics, the infinite wall is a basic problem and has not been solved yet. In this paper, we consider a free particle in an infinite wall region. Making use of the Lévy path integral method, we derive the Lévy path integral amplitude of the particle and take advantage of it to get the solution of the fractional Schrödinger equation for an infinite wall. Then, the infinite wall potential with a delta-function perturbation is also studied. According to Fox’s H-function, we get an equation of bound state energies of a free particle moving in an infinite wall region perturbed by the δ-function for two situations, E < 0 and E > 0. We give a transcendental equation that determines energy levels when E < 0 and prove that there is no bound states when E > 0. The asymptotic behaviors of the center of the delta function approaching to the origin and the infinite are also shown. The results of this paper include special cases in standard quantum mechanics.

Journal of Mathematical Physics•Mar 1, 2021•2 citations

Comment on “Fractional quantum mechanics” and “Fractional Schrödinger equation”

Yuchuan Wei

In this Comment we point out some shortcomings in two papers [N. Laskin, Phys. Rev. E 62, 3135 (2000)10.1103/PhysRevE.62.3135; N. Laskin, Phys. Rev. E 66, 056108 (2002)10.1103/PhysRevE.66.056108]. We prove that the fractional uncertainty relation does not hold generally. The probability continuity equation in fractional quantum mechanics has a missing source term, which leads to particle teleportation, i.e., a particle can teleport from a place to another. Since the relativistic kinetic energy can be viewed as an approximate realization of the fractional kinetic energy, the particle teleportation should be an observable relativistic effect in quantum mechanics. With the help of this concept, superconductivity could be viewed as the teleportation of electrons from one side of a superconductor to another and superfluidity could be viewed as the teleportation of helium atoms from one end of a capillary tube to the other. We also point out how to teleport a particle to an arbitrary destination.

arXiv:1607.01356•Physical review. E•Jun 29, 2016•43 citations

Some Solutions to the Fractional and Relativistic Schrödinger Equations

Yuchuan Wei

Laskin introduced the fractional quantum mechanics and several common problems were solved in a piecewise fashion. However, Jeng et al pointed out that it was meaningless to solve a nonlocal equation in a piecewise fashion and that all the solutions in publication were wrong except the solution for the delta function potential, which was obtained in the momentum space. Jeng's critique results in a crisis of fractional quantum mechanics, that is, in mathematics it is quite difficult to find solutions to the fractional Schrodinger equation and in physics there is no realization for the fractional quantum mechanics. In order to eliminate this crisis, this paper reports some analytic solutions to the fractional Schrodinger equation without using piecewise method, and introduces the relativistic Schrodinger equation as a realization of the fractional quantum mechanics. These two sister equations should be studied at the same time.

International Journal of Theoretical and Mathematical Physics•Jan 1, 2015•5 citations
In this paper, the fractional Schrödinger equation that contains the quantum Riesz fractional derivative instead of the Laplace operator is revisited for the case of a particle moving in the infinite potential well. In the recent papers [M. Jeng, S.-L.-Y. Xu, E. Hawkins, and J. M. Schwarz, “On the nonlocality of the fractional Schrödinger equation,” J. Math. Phys. 51, 062102 (2010)10.1063/1.3430552] and [S. S. Bayin, “On the consistency of the solutions of the space fractional Schrödinger equation,” J. Math. Phys. 53, 042105 (2012)10.1063/1.4705268] published in this journal, controversial opinions regarding solutions to the fractional Schrödinger equation for a particle moving in the infinite potential well that were derived by Laskin [“Fractals and quantum mechanics,” Chaos 10, 780–790 (2000)10.1063/1.1050284] have been given. In this paper, a thorough mathematical treatment of these matters is provided. The problem under consideration is reformulated in terms of three integral equations with the power kernels. Even if the equations look not very complicated, no solution to these equations in explicit form is known. Still, the obtained equations are used to show that the eigenvalues and eigenfunctions of the fractional Schrödinger equation for a particle moving in the infinite potential well given by Laskin [“Fractals and quantum mechanics,” Chaos 10, 780–790 (2000)10.1063/1.1050284] and many other papers by different authors cannot be valid as has been first stated by Jeng et al. [“On the nonlocality of the fractional Schrödinger equation,” J. Math. Phys. 51, 062102 (2010)10.1063/1.3430552].
Hawkins and Schwarz [J. Math. Phys. 54, 014101 (2013)]10.1063/1.4772533 claim that there is a flaw in the way certain integrals are evaluated to show the consistency of the infinite square well solutions of the space fractional Schrödinger equation [S. S. Bayin, J. Math. Phys. 53, 042105 (2012)10.1063/1.4705268; S. S. Bayin, J. Math. Phys. 53, 084101 (2012)]10.1063/1.4739758. We give additional details about how these integrals are evaluated and show that there is no inconsistency for an infinite square well.
The time fractional Schrodinger equation (TFSE) for a nonrelativistic particle is derived on the basis of the Feynman path integral method by extending it initially to the case of a "free particle" obeying fractional dynamics, obtained by replacing the integer order derivatives with respect to time by those of fractional order.The equations of motion contain quantities which have "fractional" dimensions, chosen such that the "energy" has the correct dimension [𝑀𝐿 2 /𝑇 2 ].The action 𝑆 is defined as a fractional time integral of the Lagrangian, and a "fractional Planck constant" is introduced.The TFSE corresponds to a "subdiffusion" equation with an imaginary fractional diffusion constant and reproduces the regular Schrodinger equation in the limit of integer order.The present work corrects a number of errors in Naber's work.The correct continuity equation for the probability density is derived and a Green function solution for the case of a "free particle" is obtained.The total probability for a "free" particle is shown to go to zero in the limit of infinite time, in contrast with Naber's result of a total probability greater than unity.A generalization to the case of a particle moving in a potential is also given.
There has been a continuous argument on the correctness of the Laskins solution for the infinite square well problem in the fractional quantum mechanics. In this paper, we prove that the Laskins functions are not amathematical solution to the fractional Schrodinger equation and the equation does not have any nonzero solutions at all in the sense of mathematics. As in the standard quantum mechanics, we view the infinite square well problem as the limit of the finite well problem, and define the solution for the infinite square well problem as the limit of the solution for the finite square well problem. Using the simple property of the infinite operators, we show that Laskins function can be the limit solution for the infinite square well problem. The single-sided well problem and the 3 dimensional well problem are included. This operator method works for the same problems in the relativistic quantum mechanicsas well.
The space-fractional Schrödinger equation for a local potential is difficult to solve because the fractional Riesz operator in it is nonlocal. In fractional quantum mechanics, the infinite wall is a basic problem and has not been solved yet. In this paper, we consider a free particle in an infinite wall region. Making use of the Lévy path integral method, we derive the Lévy path integral amplitude of the particle and take advantage of it to get the solution of the fractional Schrödinger equation for an infinite wall. Then, the infinite wall potential with a delta-function perturbation is also studied. According to Fox’s H-function, we get an equation of bound state energies of a free particle moving in an infinite wall region perturbed by the δ-function for two situations, E < 0 and E > 0. We give a transcendental equation that determines energy levels when E < 0 and prove that there is no bound states when E > 0. The asymptotic behaviors of the center of the delta function approaching to the origin and the infinite are also shown. The results of this paper include special cases in standard quantum mechanics.
In this Comment we point out some shortcomings in two papers [N. Laskin, Phys. Rev. E 62, 3135 (2000)10.1103/PhysRevE.62.3135; N. Laskin, Phys. Rev. E 66, 056108 (2002)10.1103/PhysRevE.66.056108]. We prove that the fractional uncertainty relation does not hold generally. The probability continuity equation in fractional quantum mechanics has a missing source term, which leads to particle teleportation, i.e., a particle can teleport from a place to another. Since the relativistic kinetic energy can be viewed as an approximate realization of the fractional kinetic energy, the particle teleportation should be an observable relativistic effect in quantum mechanics. With the help of this concept, superconductivity could be viewed as the teleportation of electrons from one side of a superconductor to another and superfluidity could be viewed as the teleportation of helium atoms from one end of a capillary tube to the other. We also point out how to teleport a particle to an arbitrary destination.
Laskin introduced the fractional quantum mechanics and several common problems were solved in a piecewise fashion. However, Jeng et al pointed out that it was meaningless to solve a nonlocal equation in a piecewise fashion and that all the solutions in publication were wrong except the solution for the delta function potential, which was obtained in the momentum space. Jeng's critique results in a crisis of fractional quantum mechanics, that is, in mathematics it is quite difficult to find solutions to the fractional Schrodinger equation and in physics there is no realization for the fractional quantum mechanics. In order to eliminate this crisis, this paper reports some analytic solutions to the fractional Schrodinger equation without using piecewise method, and introduces the relativistic Schrodinger equation as a realization of the fractional quantum mechanics. These two sister equations should be studied at the same time.