Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Foundations of Physics

Quantum theory as an indication of a new order in physics. B. Implicate and explicate order in physical law

David Böhm

Published Jun 1, 1973• 85 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/bf00708436

Related papers

Quantum theory as an indication of a new order in physics. Part A. The development of new orders as shown through the history of physics

David Böhm

Foundations of Physics•Jan 1, 1971•71 citations

ボーム理論の現代的形式とその世界観について

森川, 亮

Abstract: In this paper the criticism to the Bohm's quantum theory has been discussed in the beginning. Then a formalism change of this theory from its original form to recent one is shown. The differences between the normal Copenhagen interpretation and that of Bohm's quantum theory are possible to be seen. Bohm's new idea and new terms such as implicate and explicate order, process, unfold and enfold are discussed to give an interpretation to the theory. This is also able to show that Bohm theory requests the radical change about our world-picture. Key words; Bohm theory, The implicate & explicate order, Quantum potential and Information.

•Feb 15, 2009•0 citations

Quantum theory as a universal physical theory

David Deutsch

International Journal of Theoretical Physics•Jan 1, 1985•393 citations

The Universe and the limits of Knowledge: Bohm’s Notion of the Implicate Order of Nature

Dimitrios Galanis-Kolintzas

According to Bohm the whole scientific description of the Universe is governed by fragmentation of our perception of what reality is. Physics’ tendency of acknowledging the ultimate structure of matter in the elementary particles has caused a widespread fragmentary view of the Universe. Thus, Physics seems to be unable to conceive the “undivided wholeness of the universe” and to acknowledge in that Wholeness the common, single bed of the whole of reality. According to Bohm that single bed of nature, Implicate Order, is the single origin of both mind and matter. Inside the multidimensional Implicate Order, a universal enfoldment of everything prevails. The Implicate Order coheres deterministically to the Universe and the depths of its inwardness are totally unknown to us, since we humans are part of its wholeness too. Physics as a science provides us only with abstractive descriptions of the Universe, since science offers only abstractions from reality. These abstractive descriptions are what constitute the Explicate Order of the Universe. Thus, each belief we have that through the science of Physics we are able to arrive at an ultimate deciphering of the Universe is inherently illusive. The science of Physics can provide us with knowledge only in the fragmentary level of the Explicate, that means analyzable, Order of the Universe recognizing its cognitive limits in front of the Implicate Order. The laws that govern the Implicate Order of the Universe are unknowable and unanalyzable by man and in the depths of these laws Bohm insists that a final truth about reality cannot be fixed.

Epistēmēs Metron Logos•Jul 21, 2020•0 citations

Summary of Quantum Theory

Eugen Fick, Günter Sauermann

Springer series in solid-state sciences•Jan 1, 1990•0 citations

Three-Aspect Models of Reality

RW Boyer

Reviews Penrose’s three-realm model, Hameroff and Penrose’s ‘Orch-OR’ theory, Tegmark’s levels of the computational/mathematical multiverse model, Davies’ three-level model of matter-laws of nature-information, Stapp’s three-aspect model of local physical, ‘experiental reality,’ and Hilbert space; Bohm and Hiley’s three-level model of explicate, implicate, and super-implicate orders, Hagelin’s three-aspect mathematical model of quantum mechanical states, quantum mechanical observables, and Hilbert space; and how all these models are progressing toward the holistic Vedic 3-in-1 model.

Routledge eBooks•Aug 18, 2020•0 citations
Abstract: In this paper the criticism to the Bohm's quantum theory has been discussed in the beginning. Then a formalism change of this theory from its original form to recent one is shown. The differences between the normal Copenhagen interpretation and that of Bohm's quantum theory are possible to be seen. Bohm's new idea and new terms such as implicate and explicate order, process, unfold and enfold are discussed to give an interpretation to the theory. This is also able to show that Bohm theory requests the radical change about our world-picture. Key words; Bohm theory, The implicate & explicate order, Quantum potential and Information.
According to Bohm the whole scientific description of the Universe is governed by fragmentation of our perception of what reality is. Physics’ tendency of acknowledging the ultimate structure of matter in the elementary particles has caused a widespread fragmentary view of the Universe. Thus, Physics seems to be unable to conceive the “undivided wholeness of the universe” and to acknowledge in that Wholeness the common, single bed of the whole of reality. According to Bohm that single bed of nature, Implicate Order, is the single origin of both mind and matter. Inside the multidimensional Implicate Order, a universal enfoldment of everything prevails. The Implicate Order coheres deterministically to the Universe and the depths of its inwardness are totally unknown to us, since we humans are part of its wholeness too. Physics as a science provides us only with abstractive descriptions of the Universe, since science offers only abstractions from reality. These abstractive descriptions are what constitute the Explicate Order of the Universe. Thus, each belief we have that through the science of Physics we are able to arrive at an ultimate deciphering of the Universe is inherently illusive. The science of Physics can provide us with knowledge only in the fragmentary level of the Explicate, that means analyzable, Order of the Universe recognizing its cognitive limits in front of the Implicate Order. The laws that govern the Implicate Order of the Universe are unknowable and unanalyzable by man and in the depths of these laws Bohm insists that a final truth about reality cannot be fixed.
Reviews Penrose’s three-realm model, Hameroff and Penrose’s ‘Orch-OR’ theory, Tegmark’s levels of the computational/mathematical multiverse model, Davies’ three-level model of matter-laws of nature-information, Stapp’s three-aspect model of local physical, ‘experiental reality,’ and Hilbert space; Bohm and Hiley’s three-level model of explicate, implicate, and super-implicate orders, Hagelin’s three-aspect mathematical model of quantum mechanical states, quantum mechanical observables, and Hilbert space; and how all these models are progressing toward the holistic Vedic 3-in-1 model.