Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

American Journal of Physics

Guest Comment: Is realism a dirty word?

Martin R. Gardner

Published Mar 1, 1989• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1119/1.16085

Related papers

Realism and Other Isms

Alan A. Grometstein

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1999•0 citations

Philosophical background

E.J Squires

A spirited and provocative defence of realism, Is realism a dirty word?, is given by Gardner (1989); more serious readers might prefer that given in the book Computational Philosophy of Science (Thagard, 1988). Unfortunately neither of these authors give sufficient attention to the real problems presented by quantum theory. For this one should consult the detailed discussion of d'Espagnat (1989) in Reality and the Physicist.

CRC Press eBooks•Jan 1, 1990•0 citations

The Uninvited Guest: ‘Local Realism’ and the Bell Theorem

Federico Laudisa

Springer eBooks•Sep 26, 2011•12 citations

Against ‘Realism’

Travis Norsen

arXiv:quant-ph/0607057•Foundations of Physics•Feb 3, 2007•83 citations

Reality Is Not What It Seems

Carlo Rovelli C

•Jan 1, 2014•87 citations

Comment on `Large-Ntheory of strongly commensurate dirty bosons: absence of a transition in two dimensions'

M. B. Hastings

We show that the strongly commensurate dirty boson system must have a phase transition in two dimensions, and argue that the low-lying states have a diverging localization length.

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General•Mar 4, 2002•0 citations