Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Theoretical and Mathematical Physics

Operator calculations in the theory of path integrals

Ivailo Tsvetkov

Published Aug 1, 1994• 1 citation
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/bf01016761

Related papers

An operator expansion technique for path integral analysis

Ivailo Tsvetkov

Physics Letters A•Sep 1, 1995•0 citations

Scattering using real-time path integrals

Wayne Nicholas Polyzou, Ekaterina S. Nathanson

Background: Path integrals are a powerful tool for solving problems in quantum theory that are not amenable to a treatment by perturbation theory. Most path integral computations require an analytic continuation to imaginary time. While imaginary time treatments of scattering are possible, imaginary time is not a natural framework for treating scattering problems. More importantly, quantum algorithms for calculating path integrals require real-time evolution.Purpose: We test a recently introduced method for performing direct calculations of scattering observables using real-time path integrals in order to understand the challenges facing real-time path integral calculations of scattering observables.Method: The computations are based on a new interpretation of the path integral as the expectation value of a potential functional on cylinder sets of continuous paths with respect to a complex probability distribution. The method can in principle be applied to arbitrary short-range potentials.Results: The method is applied to compute matrix elements of M\o{}ller wave operators applied to narrow wave packets. These are used to calculate half-shell sharp-momentum transition matrix elements for one-dimensional potential scattering. The calculations for half-shell transition operator matrix elements converge to the numerical solution of the Lippmann-Schwinger equation.Conclusions: This work presents a proof in principle that scattering observables can be computed using real-time Feynman path integrals. While the computational method is not efficient, it can be improved. It provides a laboratory for studying quantum computational algorithms that are applicable to scattering problems.

arXiv:1712.00046•Physical Review C•Jun 4, 2020•2 citations

Path integrals and ordering of operators

L. F. Blazhievskii

Theoretical and Mathematical Physics•Jul 1, 1979•6 citations

Path integral invariance under point canonical transformations

Andres Jordan, Matias Libedinsky

It is often stated in the literature on path integrals that naive changes of coordinates might in general give inequivalent theories. The discrepancy is presumably connected to subtleties in the discretization, to the stochastic nature of quantum paths, or to operator order ambiguities in the canonical quantization. Here we argue that in order to define a path integral one needs not only a Lagrangian but also a set of paths that join succesive points in the discretized paths. If the set of paths is maintained when performing a point canonical transformation the path integral does not change. We explicitly show this with the calculation of the free particle kernel in polar coordinates.

•Mar 25, 1997•1 citation

Path Integrals and Operator Calculus: QED and Other Applications

World Scientific series in 20th century physics•Oct 1, 2000•0 citations

Making the coherent state path integral great again: insights from stochastic calculus

Adam Rançon

Recently, doubts have been cast on the validity of the continuous-time coherent state path integral. This has led to controversies regarding the correct way of performing calculations with path integrals, and to several alternative definitions of what should be their continuous limit. Furthermore, the issue of a supposedly proper ordering of the Hamiltonian operator, entangled with the continuous-time limit, has led to considerable confusion in the literature. Since coherent state path integrals are at the basis of the modern formulation of many-body quantum theory, it should be laid on solid foundations. Here, we show that the standard coherent state path integral is fine as it is, and does not need any modification. We show that the issues raised above are coming from illegitimate use of the (standard) rules of calculus, which are not necessarily valid in path integrals. This is well known in the context of stochastic equations, in particular in their path integral formulation. This insight allows for solving these issues, and addressing the correspondence between the various orderings at the level of the path integral. We also use this opportunity to address the proper calculation of a functional determinant in the presence of a Hubbard-Stratonovich field, which shares in the controversies.

•Jun 6, 2019•0 citations
Background: Path integrals are a powerful tool for solving problems in quantum theory that are not amenable to a treatment by perturbation theory. Most path integral computations require an analytic continuation to imaginary time. While imaginary time treatments of scattering are possible, imaginary time is not a natural framework for treating scattering problems. More importantly, quantum algorithms for calculating path integrals require real-time evolution.Purpose: We test a recently introduced method for performing direct calculations of scattering observables using real-time path integrals in order to understand the challenges facing real-time path integral calculations of scattering observables.Method: The computations are based on a new interpretation of the path integral as the expectation value of a potential functional on cylinder sets of continuous paths with respect to a complex probability distribution. The method can in principle be applied to arbitrary short-range potentials.Results: The method is applied to compute matrix elements of M\o{}ller wave operators applied to narrow wave packets. These are used to calculate half-shell sharp-momentum transition matrix elements for one-dimensional potential scattering. The calculations for half-shell transition operator matrix elements converge to the numerical solution of the Lippmann-Schwinger equation.Conclusions: This work presents a proof in principle that scattering observables can be computed using real-time Feynman path integrals. While the computational method is not efficient, it can be improved. It provides a laboratory for studying quantum computational algorithms that are applicable to scattering problems.
It is often stated in the literature on path integrals that naive changes of coordinates might in general give inequivalent theories. The discrepancy is presumably connected to subtleties in the discretization, to the stochastic nature of quantum paths, or to operator order ambiguities in the canonical quantization. Here we argue that in order to define a path integral one needs not only a Lagrangian but also a set of paths that join succesive points in the discretized paths. If the set of paths is maintained when performing a point canonical transformation the path integral does not change. We explicitly show this with the calculation of the free particle kernel in polar coordinates.
Recently, doubts have been cast on the validity of the continuous-time coherent state path integral. This has led to controversies regarding the correct way of performing calculations with path integrals, and to several alternative definitions of what should be their continuous limit. Furthermore, the issue of a supposedly proper ordering of the Hamiltonian operator, entangled with the continuous-time limit, has led to considerable confusion in the literature. Since coherent state path integrals are at the basis of the modern formulation of many-body quantum theory, it should be laid on solid foundations. Here, we show that the standard coherent state path integral is fine as it is, and does not need any modification. We show that the issues raised above are coming from illegitimate use of the (standard) rules of calculus, which are not necessarily valid in path integrals. This is well known in the context of stochastic equations, in particular in their path integral formulation. This insight allows for solving these issues, and addressing the correspondence between the various orderings at the level of the path integral. We also use this opportunity to address the proper calculation of a functional determinant in the presence of a Hubbard-Stratonovich field, which shares in the controversies.