Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1906.02571 · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical

Hubbard–Stratonovich transformation and consistent ordering in the coherent state path integral: insights from stochastic calculus

Adam Rançon

Published Jan 17, 2020• 4 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Abstract Recently, doubts have been cast on the validity of the continuous-time coherent state path integral. This has led to controversies regarding the correct way of performing calculations with path integrals, and to several alternative definitions of what should be their continuous limit. Furthermore, the issue of a supposedly proper ordering of the Hamiltonian operator, entangled with the continuous-time limit, has led to considerable confusion in the literature. Since coherent state path integrals are at the basis of the modern formulation of many-body quantum theory, it should be laid on solid foundations. Here, we show that the issues raised above are coming from the illegitimate use of the (standard) rules of calculus, which are not necessarily valid in path integrals. This is well known in the context of stochastic equations, in particular in their path integral formulation. This insight allows for solving these issues and addressing the correspondence between the various orderings at the level of the path integral. We also use this opportunity to address the proper calculation of a functional determinant in the presence of a Hubbard–Stratonovich field, which shares in the controversies.

DOI
10.1088/1751-8121/ab6d3b

Related papers

Making the coherent state path integral great again: insights from stochastic calculus

Adam Rançon

Recently, doubts have been cast on the validity of the continuous-time coherent state path integral. This has led to controversies regarding the correct way of performing calculations with path integrals, and to several alternative definitions of what should be their continuous limit. Furthermore, the issue of a supposedly proper ordering of the Hamiltonian operator, entangled with the continuous-time limit, has led to considerable confusion in the literature. Since coherent state path integrals are at the basis of the modern formulation of many-body quantum theory, it should be laid on solid foundations. Here, we show that the standard coherent state path integral is fine as it is, and does not need any modification. We show that the issues raised above are coming from illegitimate use of the (standard) rules of calculus, which are not necessarily valid in path integrals. This is well known in the context of stochastic equations, in particular in their path integral formulation. This insight allows for solving these issues, and addressing the correspondence between the various orderings at the level of the path integral. We also use this opportunity to address the proper calculation of a functional determinant in the presence of a Hubbard-Stratonovich field, which shares in the controversies.

•Jun 6, 2019•0 citations

Exact path-integral evaluation of locally interacting systems: The subtlety of operator ordering

Nobuhiko Taniguchi

We discuss how one calculates the coherent path integrals for locally interacting systems, where some inconsistencies with exact results have been reported previously. It is shown that the operator ordering subtlety that is hidden in the local interaction term modifies the Hubbard-Stratonovich transformation in the continuous time formulation, and it helps reproduce known results by the operator method. We also demonstrate that many-body effects in the strong interaction limit can be well characterized by the free-particle theory that is subject to annealed random potentials and dynamical gauge (or phase) fields. The present treatment expands the conventional paradigm of the one-particle description, and it provides a simple, viable picture for strongly correlated materials of either bosonic or fermionic systems.

arXiv:1709.09303•Physical Review A•Oct 10, 2017•6 citations

Rigorous construction of coherent state path integrals through dualization

Falk Bruckmann A, Juan Diego Urbina

Two long-standing problems in the construction of coherent state path integrals, the unwarranted assumption of path continuity and the ambiguous definition of the Hamiltonian symbol, are rigorously solved. To this end the fully controlled dual representation familiar from lattice quantum field theories is introduced. Dualization allows for both the step-by-step check in the construction of discrete path integrals and for the identification of the Hamiltonian and Berry phase part of the action, thus making both discrete and continuous path integrals consistently defined. Once the correct action is constructed, we are able to follow the transition to the continuum for the polar form of general Bose-Hubbard models and to provide an exact form of the path integral for general spin systems, where previous works showed its failure for all standard choices of operator ordering.

arXiv:1807.10462•Jul 27, 2018•6 citations

Selecta from a Life-Long Obsession with Path Integrals

John R. Klauder, Christopher Casenas Bernido, M. Victoria Carpio-Bernido

The definition and interpretation of canonical, phase space path integrals has evolved over many years to achieve a form that now admits a correct and rigorous formulation, which is also covariant under canonical coordinate transformations. Such formulations involve coherent state representations, which, in their modern version, were originally introduced as an alternative tool to construct phase space path integrals. Moreover, coherent state representations lead to physical interpretations that are more natural than those afforded by more traditional representations. Suitable continuous time regularization procedures lead to a covariant phase space path integral formulation that greatly clarifies the vague phrase that canonical quantization requires Cartesian coordinates.

AIP conference proceedings•Jan 1, 2008•0 citations

Path Integrals

Michael El-Batanouny

Presents functional integral methods of quantum many-body theory. Starting with Feynman’s path integral, it develops functional integrals of partition functions in imaginary time and extends these techniques to many-body systems. It expands the formulation in the coherent-state basis, and describes the application of the Hubbard–Stratononvich transformation and the saddle-point approximation.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Mar 6, 2020•0 citations

Path-integral formulation of bosonic Markovian open quantum dynamics with Monte Carlo stochastic trajectories using the Glauber–Sudarshan P, Wigner, and Husimi Q functions and hybrids

Toma Yoneya, Kazuya Fujimoto, Yuki Kawaguchi

The Monte Carlo trajectory sampling of stochastic differential equations based on the quasiprobability distribution functions, such as the Glauber–Sudarshan P, Wigner, and Husimi Q functions, enables us to investigate bosonic open quantum many-body dynamics described by the Gorini–Kossakowski–Sudarshan–Lindblad (GKSL) equation. In this method, the Monte Carlo samplings for the initial distribution and stochastic noises incorporate quantum fluctuations, and thus, we can go beyond the mean-field approximation. However, description using stochastic differential equations is possible only when the corresponding Fokker–Planck equation has a positive-semidefinite diffusion matrix. In this work, we analytically derive the stochastic differential equations for arbitrary Hamiltonian and jump operators based on the path-integral formula, independently of the derivation of the Fokker–Planck equation. In the course of the derivation, we formulate the path-integral representation of the GKSL equation by using the -ordered quasiprobability distribution function, which systematically describes the aforementioned quasiprobability distribution functions by changing the real parameter . The essential point of this derivation is that we employ the Hubbard–Stratonovich transformation in the path integral, and its application is not always feasible. We find that the feasible condition of the Hubbard–Stratonovich transformation is identical to the positive-semidefiniteness condition of the diffusion matrix in the Fokker–Planck equation. In the benchmark calculations, we confirm that the Monte Carlo simulations of the obtained stochastic differential equations well reproduce the exact dynamics of physical quantities and non-equal time correlation functions of numerically solvable models, including the Bose–Hubbard model. This work clarifies the applicability of the approximation and gives systematic and simplified procedures to obtain the stochastic differential equations to be numerically solved.

arXiv:2508.01991•Annals of Physics•Dec 16, 2025•0 citations
Abstract Recently, doubts have been cast on the validity of the continuous-time coherent state path integral. This has led to controversies regarding the correct way of performing calculations with path integrals, and to several alternative definitions of what should be their continuous limit. Furthermore, the issue of a supposedly proper ordering of the Hamiltonian operator, entangled with the continuous-time limit, has led to considerable confusion in the literature. Since coherent state path integrals are at the basis of the modern formulation of many-body quantum theory, it should be laid on solid foundations. Here, we show that the issues raised above are coming from the illegitimate use of the (standard) rules of calculus, which are not necessarily valid in path integrals. This is well known in the context of stochastic equations, in particular in their path integral formulation. This insight allows for solving these issues and addressing the correspondence between the various orderings at the level of the path integral. We also use this opportunity to address the proper calculation of a functional determinant in the presence of a Hubbard–Stratonovich field, which shares in the controversies.
Recently, doubts have been cast on the validity of the continuous-time coherent state path integral. This has led to controversies regarding the correct way of performing calculations with path integrals, and to several alternative definitions of what should be their continuous limit. Furthermore, the issue of a supposedly proper ordering of the Hamiltonian operator, entangled with the continuous-time limit, has led to considerable confusion in the literature. Since coherent state path integrals are at the basis of the modern formulation of many-body quantum theory, it should be laid on solid foundations. Here, we show that the standard coherent state path integral is fine as it is, and does not need any modification. We show that the issues raised above are coming from illegitimate use of the (standard) rules of calculus, which are not necessarily valid in path integrals. This is well known in the context of stochastic equations, in particular in their path integral formulation. This insight allows for solving these issues, and addressing the correspondence between the various orderings at the level of the path integral. We also use this opportunity to address the proper calculation of a functional determinant in the presence of a Hubbard-Stratonovich field, which shares in the controversies.
We discuss how one calculates the coherent path integrals for locally interacting systems, where some inconsistencies with exact results have been reported previously. It is shown that the operator ordering subtlety that is hidden in the local interaction term modifies the Hubbard-Stratonovich transformation in the continuous time formulation, and it helps reproduce known results by the operator method. We also demonstrate that many-body effects in the strong interaction limit can be well characterized by the free-particle theory that is subject to annealed random potentials and dynamical gauge (or phase) fields. The present treatment expands the conventional paradigm of the one-particle description, and it provides a simple, viable picture for strongly correlated materials of either bosonic or fermionic systems.
Two long-standing problems in the construction of coherent state path integrals, the unwarranted assumption of path continuity and the ambiguous definition of the Hamiltonian symbol, are rigorously solved. To this end the fully controlled dual representation familiar from lattice quantum field theories is introduced. Dualization allows for both the step-by-step check in the construction of discrete path integrals and for the identification of the Hamiltonian and Berry phase part of the action, thus making both discrete and continuous path integrals consistently defined. Once the correct action is constructed, we are able to follow the transition to the continuum for the polar form of general Bose-Hubbard models and to provide an exact form of the path integral for general spin systems, where previous works showed its failure for all standard choices of operator ordering.
The definition and interpretation of canonical, phase space path integrals has evolved over many years to achieve a form that now admits a correct and rigorous formulation, which is also covariant under canonical coordinate transformations. Such formulations involve coherent state representations, which, in their modern version, were originally introduced as an alternative tool to construct phase space path integrals. Moreover, coherent state representations lead to physical interpretations that are more natural than those afforded by more traditional representations. Suitable continuous time regularization procedures lead to a covariant phase space path integral formulation that greatly clarifies the vague phrase that canonical quantization requires Cartesian coordinates.
The Monte Carlo trajectory sampling of stochastic differential equations based on the quasiprobability distribution functions, such as the Glauber–Sudarshan P, Wigner, and Husimi Q functions, enables us to investigate bosonic open quantum many-body dynamics described by the Gorini–Kossakowski–Sudarshan–Lindblad (GKSL) equation. In this method, the Monte Carlo samplings for the initial distribution and stochastic noises incorporate quantum fluctuations, and thus, we can go beyond the mean-field approximation. However, description using stochastic differential equations is possible only when the corresponding Fokker–Planck equation has a positive-semidefinite diffusion matrix. In this work, we analytically derive the stochastic differential equations for arbitrary Hamiltonian and jump operators based on the path-integral formula, independently of the derivation of the Fokker–Planck equation. In the course of the derivation, we formulate the path-integral representation of the GKSL equation by using the -ordered quasiprobability distribution function, which systematically describes the aforementioned quasiprobability distribution functions by changing the real parameter . The essential point of this derivation is that we employ the Hubbard–Stratonovich transformation in the path integral, and its application is not always feasible. We find that the feasible condition of the Hubbard–Stratonovich transformation is identical to the positive-semidefiniteness condition of the diffusion matrix in the Fokker–Planck equation. In the benchmark calculations, we confirm that the Monte Carlo simulations of the obtained stochastic differential equations well reproduce the exact dynamics of physical quantities and non-equal time correlation functions of numerically solvable models, including the Bose–Hubbard model. This work clarifies the applicability of the approximation and gives systematic and simplified procedures to obtain the stochastic differential equations to be numerically solved.