We discuss how one calculates the coherent path integrals for locally interacting systems, where some inconsistencies with exact results have been reported previously. It is shown that the operator ordering subtlety that is hidden in the local interaction term modifies the Hubbard-Stratonovich transformation in the continuous time formulation, and it helps reproduce known results by the operator method. We also demonstrate that many-body effects in the strong interaction limit can be well characterized by the free-particle theory that is subject to annealed random potentials and dynamical gauge (or phase) fields. The present treatment expands the conventional paradigm of the one-particle description, and it provides a simple, viable picture for strongly correlated materials of either bosonic or fermionic systems.
We discuss how one calculates the coherent path integrals for locally interacting systems, where some inconsistencies with exact results have been reported previously. It is shown that the operator ordering subtlety that is hidden in the local interaction term modifies the Hubbard-Stratonovich transformation in the continuous time formulation, and it helps reproduce known results by the operator method. We also demonstrate that many-body effects in the strong interaction limit can be well characterized by the free-particle theory that is subject to annealed random potentials and dynamical gauge (or phase) fields. The present treatment expands the conventional paradigm of the one-particle description, and it provides a simple, viable picture for strongly correlated materials of either bosonic or fermionic systems.
Abstract Recently, doubts have been cast on the validity of the continuous-time coherent state path integral. This has led to controversies regarding the correct way of performing calculations with path integrals, and to several alternative definitions of what should be their continuous limit. Furthermore, the issue of a supposedly proper ordering of the Hamiltonian operator, entangled with the continuous-time limit, has led to considerable confusion in the literature. Since coherent state path integrals are at the basis of the modern formulation of many-body quantum theory, it should be laid on solid foundations. Here, we show that the issues raised above are coming from the illegitimate use of the (standard) rules of calculus, which are not necessarily valid in path integrals. This is well known in the context of stochastic equations, in particular in their path integral formulation. This insight allows for solving these issues and addressing the correspondence between the various orderings at the level of the path integral. We also use this opportunity to address the proper calculation of a functional determinant in the presence of a Hubbard–Stratonovich field, which shares in the controversies.
Recently, doubts have been cast on the validity of the continuous-time coherent state path integral. This has led to controversies regarding the correct way of performing calculations with path integrals, and to several alternative definitions of what should be their continuous limit. Furthermore, the issue of a supposedly proper ordering of the Hamiltonian operator, entangled with the continuous-time limit, has led to considerable confusion in the literature. Since coherent state path integrals are at the basis of the modern formulation of many-body quantum theory, it should be laid on solid foundations. Here, we show that the standard coherent state path integral is fine as it is, and does not need any modification. We show that the issues raised above are coming from illegitimate use of the (standard) rules of calculus, which are not necessarily valid in path integrals. This is well known in the context of stochastic equations, in particular in their path integral formulation. This insight allows for solving these issues, and addressing the correspondence between the various orderings at the level of the path integral. We also use this opportunity to address the proper calculation of a functional determinant in the presence of a Hubbard-Stratonovich field, which shares in the controversies.
In these notes, we elucidate some subtle aspects of coherent-state path integrals, focusing on their application to the equilibrium thermodynamics of quantum many-particle systems. These subtleties emerge when evaluating path integrals in the continuum, either in imaginary time or in Matsubara-frequency space. Our central message is that, when handled with due care, the path integral yields results identical to those obtained from the canonical Hamiltonian approach. We illustrate this through a pedagogical treatment of several paradigmatic systems: the bosonic and fermionic harmonic oscillators, the single-site Bose-Hubbard and Hubbard models, the weakly-interacting Bose gas with finite-range interactions, and the BCS superconductor with finite-range interactions.
By precisely writing down the matrix element of the local Boltzmann operator (e(−τh), where h is the paired operator formed by two interacting terms conjugate to each other), we have proposed a new path integral formulation for quantum field theory and developed a corresponding Monte Carlo algorithm. Our formula presents remarkable outcomes such that: 1) the Hubbard-Stratonovich transformation is not necessary, and the auxiliary field is no longer needed, which can improve the computational efficiency. 2) The new formula improves the accuracy of the Suzuki-Trotter decomposition. Our method also provides a potential theoretical framework for analyzing and solving the fermion sign problem. As an example, we studied the one-dimensional half-filled Hubbard model at a finite temperature. The obtained results were in excellent agreement with the known solutions. The new formula and Monte Carlo algorithm could be used in various studies.
In strongly correlated electron systems the constraint which prohibits the double electron occupation at local sites can be realized by either the infinite Coulomb interaction or the correlated hopping interaction described by the Hubbard operators, but they both render the conventional field theory inapplicable. Relaxing such the constraint leads to a class of correlated hopping models based on the deformed Hubbard operators which smoothly interpolate the locally free and strong coupling limits by a tunable interaction parameter 0≤λ≤1. Here we propose a coherent state path integral approach appropriate to the deformed Hubbard operators for {\it arbitrary} λ. It is shown that this model system exhibits the correlated Fermi liquid behavior characterized by the enhanced Wilson ratio for all λ. It is further found that in the presence of on-site Coulomb interaction a finite Mott gap appears between the upper and lower Hubbard bands, with the upper band spectral weight being heavily reduced by λ. Our approach stands in general spatial dimensions and reveals an unexpected interplay between the correlated hopping and the Coulomb repulsion.
We present a path integral formalism for expressing matrix elements of the density matrix of a quantum many-body system between any two coherent states in terms of standard Matsubara action with periodic (antiperiodic) boundary conditions on bosonic (fermionic) fields. We show that this enables us to express several entanglement measures for bosonic and fermionic many-body systems described by a Gaussian action in terms of the Matsubara Green function. We apply this formalism to compute various entanglement measures for the two-dimensional Bose-Hubbard model in the strong-coupling regime, both in the presence and absence of Abelian and non-Abelian synthetic gauge fields, within a strong-coupling mean-field theory. In addition, our method provides an alternative formalism for addressing time evolution of quantum many-body systems, with Gaussian actions, driven out of equilibrium without the use of Keldysh technique. We demonstrate this by deriving analytical expressions of the return probability and the counting statistics of several operators for a class of integrable models represented by free Dirac fermions subjected to a periodic drive in terms of the elements of their Floquet Hamiltonians. We provide a detailed comparison of our method with the earlier, related, techniques used for similar computations, discuss the significance of our results, and chart out other systems where our formalism can be used.