Perturbation treatments of irreversible processes are shown to rest on the assumption that the rate of dissipation of disturbances in a system exceeds their rate of input from an external source. This hypothesis is implicit in the concept of a dissipative system and is formulated mathematically in terms of the relaxation time of quantum-mechanical correlation functions or in terms of equivalent properties of the matrices that represent interaction operators in the energy scheme.
Perturbation treatments of irreversible processes are shown to rest on the assumption that the rate of dissipation of disturbances in a system exceeds their rate of input from an external source. This hypothesis is implicit in the concept of a dissipative system and is formulated mathematically in terms of the relaxation time of quantum-mechanical correlation functions or in terms of equivalent properties of the matrices that represent interaction operators in the energy scheme.
It is difficult to incorporate the concept of interacting physical particles in the frame of conventional quantum mechanics. It comes from the fact that in this formalism the Hamiltonian plays a dual role as the generator of motion and as the observable associated with the energy. As a result it is easy to define either a representation in which particles interact but are not well defined (a representation in which the Hamiltonian is not diagonal) or a representation in which the units are well defined but do not interact. We expect that in the search for a representation in which we may speak of both well defined and still interacting particles, the distinction between reversible and irreversible processes should play a basic role. Certainly we do not want to eliminate irreversible processes such as scattering, production or decay which are basically related to the mechanisms through which we observe particles. To distinguish between reversible and irreversible processes we have to work in a representation such that a Liapounov function (the entropy) may be ascribed to the time evolution of the system. The introduction of such a representation through a specific class of non-unitary transforms is described. We then propose newmore » quantum rules directly applicable to dissipative systems with a Liapounov function. For systems with a discrete spectrum these new quantum rules reduce trivially to the usual quantum rules as formulated by Born, Jordan and Heisenberg. The theory is applied to a simple field theoretical model - the so-called Friedrichs model-for which all calculations can be performed exactly.« less
Quantum dissipation involves both energy relaxation and decoherence, leading toward quantum thermal equilibrium. There are several theoretical prescriptions of quantum dissipation but none of them is simple enough to be treated exactly in real applications. As a result, formulations in different prescriptions are practically used with different approximation schemes. This review examines both theoretical and application aspects on various perturbative formulations, especially those that are exact up to second-order but nonequivalent in high-order system-bath coupling contributions. Discrimination is made in favor of an unconventional formulation that in a sense combines the merits of both the conventional time-local and memory-kernel prescriptions, where the latter is least favorite in terms of the applicability range of parameters for system-bath coupling, non-Markovian, and temperature. Also highlighted is the importance of correlated driving and dissipation effects, not only on the dynamics under strong external field driving, but also in the calculation of field-free correlation and response functions.
Abstract We have previously developed this framework in the context of static response, here we will generalize this perspective to dynamic response, and the evolution between distinct thermal equilibrium states. Of particular importance will be the derivation of the fluctuation-dissipation theorem, which relates the response of a system to its time dependent fluctuations, clarifying an equivalence between how a system responds to a small perturbation and how it regresses back to equilibrium in the absence of a perturbation. With this framework we can develop linear models of relaxation, classically and quantum mechanically, and derive equa- tions of motion suitable for describing the dynamics of thermal ensembles held at fixed temperature rather than fixed energy. These models are Gaussian, and approximate the dynamical correlations of interacting systems. These effective equations of motion are rendered stochastic due to the incomplete description of the microscopic degrees of freedom that evolve the system.
Nonintegrable Poincaré systems with continuous spectrum (so-called Large Poincaré Systems, LPS) lead to the appearance of diffusive terms in the framework of dynamics. These terms break time symmetry. They lead, therefore, to limitations to classical trajectory dynamics and of wave functions. These diffusive terms correspond to well-defined classes of dynamical processes (i.e., so-called “vacuum-vacuum” transitions). The diffusive effects are amplified in situations corresponding to persistent interactions. As a result, we have to include already in the fundamental dynamical description the two aspects, probability and irreversibility, which are so conspicuous on the macroscopic level. We have to formulate both classical and quantum mechanics on the Liouville level of probability distributions (or density matrices). For integrable systems, we recover the usual formulations of classical or quantum mechanics. Instead of being irreducible concepts, which cannot be further analyzed, trajectories and wave functions appear as special solutions of the Liouville-von Neumann equations. This extension of classical and quantum dynamics permits us to unify the two concepts of nature we inherited from the 19th century, based on the one hand on dynamical time-reversible laws and on the other on an evolutionary view associated to entropy. It leads also to a unified formulation of quantum theory avoiding the conventional dual structure based on Schrödinger’s equation on the one hand, and on the “collapse” of the wave function on the other. A dynamical interpretation is given to processes such as decoherence or approach to equilibrium without any appeal to extra dynamic considerations (such as the many-world theory, coarse graining or averaging over the environment). There is a striking parallelism between classical and quantum theory. For LPS we have, in general, both a “collapse” of trajectories and of wave functions for LPS. In both cases, we need a generalized formulation of dynamics in terms of probability distributions or density matrices. Since the beginning of this century, we know that classical mechanics had to be generalized to take into account the existence of universal constants. We now see that classical as well as quantum mechanics also have to be extended to include unstable dynamical systems such as LPS. As a result, we achieve a new formulation of "laws of physics" dealing no more with certitudes but with probabilities. The formulation is appropriate to describe an open, evolving universe.