The antisymmetric spin tensor of rank two used to describe the rotational motion of a particle is assumed to satisfy the constraint condition that the velocity 4-vector is orthogonal to it. Since the dipole moment is proportional to the spin tensor, this condition leads always to a purely magnetic dipole in the rest system of the particle. Frenkel has indicated how the action principle for the classical equations of motion can be set up treating the above constraint condition as a supplementary condition. The Hamiltonian dynamics of a system having supplementary conditions and Lagrange undetermined multipliers has been discussed recently by Dirac. Dirac's method and results previously obtained give the required Hamilton–Jacobi equations and Poisson Brackets of the dynamical variables. The cases where the particle behaves like a pure gyroscope and a symmetrical top are treated. When there is an interacting field, it is assumed that the action of the Held is given by the effective 4-vector potential without further specification. The orthogonality of the velocity to the tensor dual to the spin tensor can be imposed as an alternative constraint condition. This possibility is discussed briefly. The quantum formulation is completed with the help of the standard analogy rules.
The antisymmetric spin tensor of rank two used to describe the rotational motion of a particle is assumed to satisfy the constraint condition that the velocity 4-vector is orthogonal to it. Since the dipole moment is proportional to the spin tensor, this condition leads always to a purely magnetic dipole in the rest system of the particle. Frenkel has indicated how the action principle for the classical equations of motion can be set up treating the above constraint condition as a supplementary condition. The Hamiltonian dynamics of a system having supplementary conditions and Lagrange undetermined multipliers has been discussed recently by Dirac. Dirac's method and results previously obtained give the required Hamilton–Jacobi equations and Poisson Brackets of the dynamical variables. The cases where the particle behaves like a pure gyroscope and a symmetrical top are treated. When there is an interacting field, it is assumed that the action of the Held is given by the effective 4-vector potential without further specification. The orthogonality of the velocity to the tensor dual to the spin tensor can be imposed as an alternative constraint condition. This possibility is discussed briefly. The quantum formulation is completed with the help of the standard analogy rules.
Hamilton's principle of stationary action is formulated in classical mechanics using the Lie algebra of Schouten concomitants of symmetric contravariant tensor fields on the configuration space of the system. Such a formulation is global and coordinate free. It is shown that a directly parallel formulation holds in quantum mechanics so long as all the Poisson brackets involved can be replaced in the quantum version by commutators in a canonical way. An example (where the Hamiltonian possesses a velocity dependent potential) in which this cannot be done is discussed and concluded that in this case the action is stationary only for a subclass of variations, namely those corresponding to Killing vector fields on the configuration manifold.
The conventional correspondence basis for quantum dynamics is here replaced by a self-contained quantum dynamical principle from which the equations of motion and the commutation relations can be deduced. The theory is developed in terms of the model supplied by localizable fields. A short review is first presented of the general quantum-mechanical scheme of operators and eigenvectors, in which emphasis is placed on the differential characterization of representatives and transformation functions by means of infinitesimal unitary transformations. The fundamental dynamical principle is stated as a variational equation for the transformation function connecting eigenvectors associated with different spacelike surfaces, which describes the temporal development of the system. The generator of the infinitesimal transformation is the variation of the action integral operator, the spacetime volume integral of the invariant lagrange function operator. The invariance of the lagrange function preserves the form of the dynamical principle under coordinate transformations, with the exception of those transformations which include a reversal in the positive sense of time, where a separate discussion is necessary. It will be shown in Sec. III that the requirement of invariance under time reflection imposes a restriction upon the operator properties of fields, which is simply the connection between the spin and statistics of particles. For a given dynamical system, changes in the transformation function arise only from alterations of the eigenvectors associated with the two surfaces, as generated by operators constructed from field variables attached to those surfaces. This yields the operator principle of stationary action, from which the equations of motion are obtained. Commutation relations are derived from the generating operator associated with a given surface. In particular, canonical commutation relations are obtained for those field components that are not restricted by equations of constraint. The surface generating operator also leads to generalized Schr\"odinger equations for the representative of an arbitrary state. Action integral variations which correspond to changing the dynamical system are discussed briefly. A method for constructing the transformation function is described, in a form appropriate to an integral spin field, which involves solving Hamilton-Jacobi equations for ordered operators. In Sec. III, the exceptional nature of time reflection is indicated by the remark that the charge and the energy-momentum vector behave as a pseudoscalar and pseudovector, respectively, for time reflection transformations. This shows, incidentally, that positive and negative charge must occur symmetrically in a completely covariant theory. The contrast between the pseudo energy-momentum vector and the proper displacement vector then indicates that time reflection cannot be described within the unitary transformation framework. This appears most fundamentally in the basic dynamical principle. It is important to recognize here that the contributions to the lagrange function of half-integral spin fields behave like pseudoscalars with respect to time reflection. The non-unitary transformation required to represent time reflection is found to be the replacement of a state vector by its dual, or complex conjugate vector, together with the transposition of all operators. The fundamental dynamical principle is then invariant under time reflection if inverting the order of all operators in the lagrange function leaves an integral spin contribution unaltered, and reverses the sign of a half-integral spin contribution. This implies the essential commutativity, or anti-commutativity, of integral and half-integral field components, respectively, which is the connection between spin and statistics.
The classical equations of motion of a charged point-particle with intrinsic spin under the influence of an external electromagnetic field are restated and compared with the Heisenberg equations of motion derived from the Dirac theory. The partition of angular momentum between particle and field in the classical theory is contrasted to the Dirac theory of electron spin. The analogy between the Dirac equation and the theory of parametric amplification is pointed out.A free spinning point particle moving according to the laws of classical relativistic point-particle mechanics may move along a helix. The sum of the intrinsic spin $\ensuremath{\sigma}$ and the angular momentum of the helical motion in this classical analog of zitterbewegung is an effective spin vector S which is a constant of the motion. Because of this internal motion, the effective mass M of the particle differs from the mass m which is ascribed to it in the equations of motion. Solutions are found in which S is parallel or antiparallel to the momentum, and the sign of M is determined by the helicity. When placed in a uniform electromagnetic field, the particle behaves as if it had a rest mass M and a magnetic moment $\frac{e\ensuremath{\sigma}}{\mathrm{Mc}}$, in addition to any explicit magnetic moment that may be ascribed to it.
Essentially, we solve the particle-field equations obtained in the matter distribution quantum mechanics. In the framework of this theory, a particle is described by a density amplitude function, we call wave function, as a packet of waves with the time dependent phases proportional to the relativistic Lagrangian. The mass quantization of such a particle, as a distribution of matter, is obtained from the equality of the spatial integral of the density with the mass as a characteristic of the relativistic dynamics of this matter. The particle dynamics, as a motion of a mass spatial distribution, is obtained from the equality of the wave propagation velocities with the distribution coordinate velocities. This description is a physical one, compared to the Schrödinger-Heisenberg description leading to unphysical results as a null velocity for the kinetic energy as a constant of motion, or Zitterbewegung. The description of a particle interaction with an electromagnetic field by additional Lagrangian terms, with a vector potential conjugated to coordinates, as in the Aharonov-Bohm effect, and an electric potential conjugated to time, leads to the Lorentz force, and the Maxwell equations. In the two conjugated spaces, of the coordinates and of the momentum, the dynamics of a quantum particle is described by propagation operators, depending on the coordinate-momentum product, applied to time dependent wave functions satisfying matter-field equations. Unlike the standard Schrödinger or Schrödinger-Dirac equations, depending only on the Hamiltonian operator, instead of the Hamiltonian these equations contain the Lagrangian, which, besides the Hamiltonian, include additional terms with an explicit dependence on velocity, as it is expected in a relativistic theory. We obtain the wave function of a particle-antiparticle system interacting with an electromagnetic field, as a wave packet of spinors propagating in space with finite dimensions, given by the finite definition domain of the density function, in the space of the matter-field momentum, as a constant of motion. We show that an electrically charged quantum particle, rotating in a central electric field, generates a vector potential with a magnetic field perpendicular to the rotational plane and an electric field in this plane. By a quantum transition, a photon is emitted in the particle rotational plane, with the magnetic field perpendicular to this plane, and the electric field contained in this plane. In this framework, the vector potential rotation is correlated to a particle momentum rotation, for the canonical matter-field momentum as a constant of motion, without any electromagnetic field radiated outside.
We consider a quantum particle as a wave packet in the coordinate space. When the conjugate wave packet in the momentum space is considered, we find that the group velocities of these two wave packets, which describe the particle dynamics, are in agreement with the Hamilton equations only if in the time dependent phases one considers the Lagrangian instead of the Hamiltonian which leads to the conventional Schrodinger equation. We define a relativistic quantum principle asserting that a quantum particle has a finite frequency spectrum, with a cutoff propagation velocity c as a universal constant not depending on the coordinate system, and that any time dependent phase variation is the same in any system of coordinates. From the time dependent phase invariance, the relativistic kinematics is obtained. We consider two types of possible interactions: 1) An interaction with an external field, by a modification of the time dependent phase differential with the terms proportional to the differentials of the space-time coordinates multiplied with the components of this field four-potential, and 2) an interaction by a deformation of the space-time coordinates, due to a gravitational field. From the invariance of the time dependent phase with field components, we obtain a mechanical force of the form of Lorentz’s force, and three Maxwell equations: The Gauss-Maxwell equations for the electric and magnetic fluxes, and the Faraday-Maxwell equation for the electromagnetic induction. When the fourth equation, Ampere-Maxwell, is considered, the interaction field takes the form of the electromagnetic field. For a low propagation velocity of the particle waves, we get a packet of waves with the time dependent phases proportional to the relativistic Hamiltonian, as in Dirac’s famous theory of spin, and a slowly-varying amplitude with a phase proportional to the momentum and this velocity. In the framework of our theory, the spin is obtained as an all quantum effect, without any additional assumption to the quantum theory. When a space-time deformation is considered in the time dependent phase of a quantum particle, from the group velocity we get the particle dynamics according to the general theory of relativity. In this way, the relativistic dynamics, the electromagnetic field, and the spin of a quantum particle are obtained only from the invariance of the time dependent phases of the particle wave functions.
The quasi-classical spin theory is a modified Hamilton-Jacobi theory for a classical relativistic dipole whose space-time trajectory is coupled to its spin motion. The equations of this quasi-classical theory are almost identical with the second-order (squared) Dirac equation, and, in fact, form a new WKB approximation to the second-order Dirac equation. We quantize this theory by requiring that a classical spinor "wave function" be continuous and single valued, and that it satisfy an eigenvalue equation. We find for a particle in a uniform magnetic field, and in a Coulomb field, that this quasi-classical theory predicts the same energy and angular momentum eigenvalues as the Dirac theory. The quasi-classical theory is invariant under Lorentz transformation, spin rotations, and charge conjugation. The spinor wave functions are form invariant with respect to arbitrary canonical transformations.