The model system consisting of a free particle is revisited in order to fully exploit it as a teaching resource. Because of this pedagogical aim, we chose the two-dimensional free particle system as the best choice between the opposite requests of algebraic simplicity and physical interest. Indeed, this is the simplest system possessing angular momentum which is thus introduced without undue reference to rotational motion. After briefly reviewing the classical mechanics, the quantum mechanics of a free particle is described in some detail. It is shown how two different sets of eigenfunctions naturally arise from requiring the particle to have a well-defined linear momentum or a well-defined angular momentum. The reasons for the different constant of motions and quantization schemes appearing in the two sets are discussed. The complex eigenfunctions are plotted and the significance of such plots is critically assessed. Finally, it is shown how the two alternative descriptions of the free particle are related to each other.
The model system consisting of a free particle is revisited in order to fully exploit it as a teaching resource. Because of this pedagogical aim, we chose the two-dimensional free particle system as the best choice between the opposite requests of algebraic simplicity and physical interest. Indeed, this is the simplest system possessing angular momentum which is thus introduced without undue reference to rotational motion. After briefly reviewing the classical mechanics, the quantum mechanics of a free particle is described in some detail. It is shown how two different sets of eigenfunctions naturally arise from requiring the particle to have a well-defined linear momentum or a well-defined angular momentum. The reasons for the different constant of motions and quantization schemes appearing in the two sets are discussed. The complex eigenfunctions are plotted and the significance of such plots is critically assessed. Finally, it is shown how the two alternative descriptions of the free particle are related to each other.
In this chapter we shall treat two of the most important observables of quantum mechanical systems: angular momentum and spin. We shall argue that angular momentum is the generator of rotations. In quantummechanics, angular momentum is quantized in units of the reduced Planck constant. The quantization of angular momentum is dealt with by finding the angular momentum eigenvalues and eigenstates. We shall then apply the theory of angular momentum to study the hydrogen atom. Spin is an intrinsic angular momentum of subatomic particles and therefore corresponds to an important intrinsic degree of freedom. We shall discuss briefly how spin was discovered and many of its important properties. Finally, we shall also explore here some further subtleties of quantum theory.a When we consider quantum systems in two or three spatial dimensions, we need to take into account also the effect of rotations. In this case, we need to introduce a physical quantity called the angular momentum, that is, themomentum induced by or connected with rotations. In classical physics the angular momentum of a particle about a given origin is defined by [see Fig. 8.1]
Spin-s systems Angular momentum is one of the fundamental quantities of Newtonian physics, and in quantum physics its importance is at least as great. In quantum mechanics we often distinguish between two types of angular momentum: orbital angular momentum , which a system of particles possesses due to particle motion through space; and spin angular momentum , which is an intrinsic property of a particle. The distinction will be important later, but for now we will ignore it. We will here refer to angular momentum of any sort as “spin” and develop general-purpose mathematical tools for its description. We have already dealt with spin systems, particularly the example of a spin-½ particle. Our approach began with the empirical observation that a measurement of any spin component of a spin-½ particle could yield only the results +ħ/2 or −ħ/2. We introduced the basis states | z ±〉 for the two-dimensional Hilbert space ℋ. We also gave other basis states such as {| x ±〉} and {| y ±〉} in terms of the | z ±〉 states. From basis states and measurement values we constructed operators for the spin components S x , S y , and S z . With the operators in hand, we could then examine the algebraic relations between them (such as the commutation relation in Exercise 3.56). Our job here is to generalize our analysis to systems of arbitrary spin. To do this, we will reverse our chain of logic.
Elementary particles are found in two different situations: (i) bound to metastable states of matter, for which angular momentum is quantized, and (ii) free, for which, due to their high energy-momentum and leaving aside inner a.m. or spin, the h-quantization step is completely harmless. Perhaps Quantum Mechanics can be seen just as the simplest mathematical formalism where angular momentum (the magnitude of each of its three orthogonal projections) is by construction quantized: all possible values are taken from a discrete set. Indeed: (i) This idea finds support in very reasonable, completely classical physical arguments, if we place ourselves in the framework of Stochastic Electrodynamics (SED): there, all sustained periodic movement of a charge must satisfy a power balance that restricts the value of the average angular momentum, on each of its projections. (ii) It gives a natural explanation of the concept of "photon", as a constraint on the observable spectrum of energy-momentum exchanges between metastable physical states, in particular also for its discreteness. QM would be, in this picture, a semi-static theory, transparent to all the (micro)-dynamics taking place between apparently "discrete" events (transitions in the state of the system). For instance, (the magnitude of the projections of) quantum angular momentum would only reflect average values over a (classical) cyclic trajectory, a fact that we regard as almost obvious given the particularity of the corresponding addition rules in QM.
Chapter 11 is devoted to the quantum theory of angular momentum. As in classical mechanics, working with angular momentum requires leaving the one-dimensional space, with all the complications that this entails. The importance of angular momentum resides in at least three facts: i) central problems are of particular interest; (ii) many particles have an intrinsic angular momentum (the spin); and iii) the physics of angular momentum involves features such as the so-called space quantization. The first part of the chapter deals with the orbital angular momentum and its eigenfunctions, the spherical harmonics. Its algebraic properties, embodied in the matrix representation, allow for an extension of the theory to half-integer angular momentum in terms of Pauli matrices, as well as the addition of angular momenta.
In Dirac's canonical quantization theory on systems with second-class constraints, the commutators between the position, momentum, and Hamiltonian form a set of algebraic relations that are fundamental in construction of both the quantum momentum and the Hamiltonian. For a free particle on a two-dimensional sphere or a spherical top, results show that the well-known canonical momentum ${p}_{\ensuremath{\theta}}$ breaks one of the relations, while three components of the momentum expressed in the three-dimensional Cartesian system of axes as pi(i=1,2,3) are satisfactory all around. This momentum is not only geometrically invariant but also self-adjoint, and we call it geometric momentum. The nontrivial commutators between pi generate three components of the orbital angular momentum; thus the geometric momentum is fundamental to the angular one. We note that there are five different forms of the geometric momentum proposed in the current literature, but only one of them turns out to be meaningful.
In this chapter, we develop the background needed to move our quantum mechanical formalism fully into three dimensions. We discuss angular momentum, which is the motional complement to spin angular momentum, that we developed earlier. There are some critical differences between orbital and spin angular momentum, and we need to carefully discuss how they relate and how they differ. Why is angular momentum so important? Because in problems where we have central forces (forces that depend only on the distance between two particles and act along the line connecting the two particles), the angular momentum is conserved. So, it becomes an integral part of how we solve the problem. The most important problem we have to solve, the hydrogen atom, is a central force problem; hence, we need this work before we can move forward to some really interesting physics that will come in Chap. 11 . We cover the angular momentum operators, eigenvalues, and eigenstates, their matrix representations, how to combine angular momentum, and spherical harmonics. We revisit the EPR experiment using our new formalism. We also discuss some unique representations of angular momentum by mapping to two-dimensional harmonic oscillators, as developed by Schwinger.