Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

International Journal of Theoretical Physics

Representations of empirical set theories

Hirokazu Nishimura

Published Jun 1, 1994• 19 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/bf00670784

Related papers

Empirical set theory

Hirokazu Nishimura

International Journal of Theoretical Physics•Aug 1, 1993•26 citations

Quantum mechanics as a noncommutative representation of classical conditional probabilities

Gábor Hofer‐Szabó

The aim of this paper is to analyze the reconstructability of quantum mechanics from classical conditional probabilities representing measurement outcomes conditioned on measurement choices. We will investigate how the quantum mechanical representation of classical conditional probabilities is situated within the broader frame of noncommutative representations. To this goal, we adopt some parts of the quantum formalism and ask whether empirical data can constrain the rest of the representation to conform to quantum mechanics. We will show that as the set of empirical data grows, conventional elements in the representation gradually shrink and the noncommutative representations narrow down to the unique quantum mechanical representation.

arXiv:1906.04955•Journal of Mathematical Physics•Jun 1, 2019•1 citation

Set logics and their representations

Foat Sultanbekov

International Journal of Theoretical Physics•Nov 1, 1993•10 citations

Probability as a logic for measurement representations

Giovanni Battista Rossi, Francesco Crenna

Measurement can be defined on the basis of the notion of empirical relation, which appears as a primitive term in the representational theory. Here a language is introduced for dealing with empirical relations and a probabilistic logic is applied to statements concerning them.

Journal of Physics Conference Series•Sep 6, 2013•3 citations

THE (QUANTUM) MEASUREMENT PROBLEM IN CLASSICAL MECHANICS

Christian DE RONDE

In this work we analyze the deep link between the 20th Century positivist re-foundation of physics and the famous measurement problem of quantum mechanics. We attempt to show why this is not an "obvious" nor "self evident" problem for the theory of quanta, but rather a direct consequence of the empirical-positivist understanding of physical theories when applied to the orthodox quantum formalism. In contraposition, we discuss a representational realist account of both physical 'theories' and 'measurement' which goes back to the works of Einstein, Heisenberg and Pauli. After presenting a critical analysis of Bohr's definitions of 'measurement' we continue to discuss the way in which several contemporary approaches to QM --such as decoherence, modal interpretations and QBism-- remain committed to Bohr's general methodology. Finally, in order to expose the many inconsistencies present within the (empirical-positivist) presuppositions responsible for creating the quantum measurement problem, we show how through these same set of presuppositions it is easy to derive a completely analogous paradox for the case of classical mechanics.

arXiv:2001.00241•WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•Oct 1, 2023•14 citations

Quantum Set Theory

Satoko Titani, Haruhiko Kozawa

International Journal of Theoretical Physics•Nov 1, 2003•26 citations
The aim of this paper is to analyze the reconstructability of quantum mechanics from classical conditional probabilities representing measurement outcomes conditioned on measurement choices. We will investigate how the quantum mechanical representation of classical conditional probabilities is situated within the broader frame of noncommutative representations. To this goal, we adopt some parts of the quantum formalism and ask whether empirical data can constrain the rest of the representation to conform to quantum mechanics. We will show that as the set of empirical data grows, conventional elements in the representation gradually shrink and the noncommutative representations narrow down to the unique quantum mechanical representation.
In this work we analyze the deep link between the 20th Century positivist re-foundation of physics and the famous measurement problem of quantum mechanics. We attempt to show why this is not an "obvious" nor "self evident" problem for the theory of quanta, but rather a direct consequence of the empirical-positivist understanding of physical theories when applied to the orthodox quantum formalism. In contraposition, we discuss a representational realist account of both physical 'theories' and 'measurement' which goes back to the works of Einstein, Heisenberg and Pauli. After presenting a critical analysis of Bohr's definitions of 'measurement' we continue to discuss the way in which several contemporary approaches to QM --such as decoherence, modal interpretations and QBism-- remain committed to Bohr's general methodology. Finally, in order to expose the many inconsistencies present within the (empirical-positivist) presuppositions responsible for creating the quantum measurement problem, we show how through these same set of presuppositions it is easy to derive a completely analogous paradox for the case of classical mechanics.