Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Modern Physics Letters B

DIRECT MEASUREMENT OF PHASE AND QUASIPROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS OF STATES IN CAVITY QED

Arpita Ghosh, Pradip Das

Published Feb 10, 2009• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

We study the phase properties and quasiprobability distributions of different states produced in a cavity. The number-phase properties of the states are investigated using a methodology based on the Susskind–Glogower formalism. Also the Husimi Q-functions are obtained and illustrated graphically.
DOI
10.1142/s0217984909018060

Related papers

Direct measurement of quasiprobability distributions in cavity QED

Raúl Juárez-Amaro, H. M. Moya-Cessa

We show that the set of s-parametrized quasiprobability distribution functions corresponding to an electromagnetic field in a cavity subject to dissipation can be directly measured. Such distributions contain whole information of the quantum state, therefore making it possible to recover information after losses have occurred.

Physical Review A•Aug 6, 2003•15 citations

Wigner Quasiprobability of Coherent Phase States

Alfred Wünsche

The Wigner quasiprobability, along with some of its essentialproperties, is introduced and discussed in two versions, first covering real canonical variables such as W(q,p) and second a pair of complex conjugate coordinates such as W(α,α*). The reconstruction of the density operator ϱ of states is also given. Building upon the Susskind–Glogower concept of quantum phase operators, further aspects of phase operator algebras in the quantum optics of a harmonic oscillator are discussed in relation to the realization of the su(1,1) Lie algebra. Coherent phase states |ε⟩ are introduced in analogy to the common coherent states |α⟩ in two ways, as both eigenstates of certain operators and as states generated from a ground state |0⟩ by operators of the Lie group SU(1,1). The limiting transition to the non-normalizable Fritz London phase states |eiφ⟩ on the unit circle and an (over)-completeness relation for the coherent phase states are derived. The Wigner quasiprobability W(q,p) for the coherent phase states is calculated and graphically represented. From the Wigner quasiprobability, a phase distribution W(φ) is calculated by integrating over the radius, and its uncertainty is defined and presented. The Hilbert–Schmidt distance is discussed as a measure of the non-classicality of states, where most of our with Viktor Dodonov work was carried out.

Physics•Apr 8, 2026•1 citation

Phase properties of squeezed states

Niels Grønbech‐Jensen, P. S. Ramanujam, Peter Leth Christiansen

Exact phase calculations for general squeezed states are presented. Results are given for different phase definitions, using number-state expansions. It is shown that the calculations based on the measured-phase-operator formalism leads to contrasting behavior compared with those based on the Susskind–Glogower, Lerner–Lynch, and Hermitian-phase-operator formalisms.

Journal of the Optical Society of America B•Dec 1, 1989•48 citations

Phase distributions of squeezed number states and squeezed thermal states

Alexei Vladimirovich Chizhov, Ts. Gantsog, B. K. Murzakhmetov

Phase properties of squeezed number states and squeezed thermal states are studied. Exact analytical formulae for phase distributions based on different phase approaches are derived and illustrated graphically. It is shown that the phase quasiprobability distribution P (W) ( theta ) associated with the Wigner function does not depend on the photon number of the initial number state and has the same form for both kinds of squeezed states under consideration while the Pegg-Barnett phase distribution and the phase quasiprobability distributions associated with the Q function and the Glauber-Sudarshan P function, approach P (W) ( theta ) in the limit of highly excited states.

Quantum Optics Journal of the European Optical Society Part B•Apr 1, 1993•15 citations

Wigner function for number and phase

John A. Vaccaro, David Thomas Pegg

Various quasiprobability distributions have been developed in the past using the Hilbert space of the single-mode light field. The development of a quasiprobability distribution associated with a phase operator has previously been impossible because of the absence of a unique Hermitian phase operator defined on the Hilbert space. Recently, however, Pegg and Barnett [Europhys. Lett. 6, 483 (1988); Phys. Rev. A 39, 1665 (1989)] and Barnett and Pegg [J. Mod. Optics 36, 7 (1989)] introduced a new formalism that does allow the construction of a Hermitian phase operator and associated phase eigenstates. In this paper we develop a quasiprobability distribution associated with the number and phase operators of the single-mode light field in the new formalism. The new distribution, which we call the number-phase Wigner function, has properties analogous to the Wigner function. We also derive the number-phase Wigner representation of number states, phase states, general physical states, coherent states, and the squeezed vacuum. We find this new representation has features that are related to the number and phase properties of states. For example, the number-phase Wigner representation of a number state is nonzero only on a circle, while the representation of a phase state is only nonzero along a radial line.

Physical Review A•May 1, 1990•91 citations

Experimentally-driven approach for measuring quantum phase uncertainty

Jaewoo Joo, Jacob Dunningham, Daniel K. L. Oi +1 more

We propose a new generalised formalism for estimating the quantum phase uncertainty of pure and mixed continuous-variable quantum states and compare this with the phase uncertainty given by the quantum Fisher information. In order to preserve the Hermiticity of the operators, we use the Heisenberg and Schroedinger uncertainty relations to derive expressions for the phase uncertainty from generalised Susskind-Glogower operators. This formalism not only offers the possibility of directly measuring quantum phase uncertainties in a cavity-QED experiment but also gives a significant computational saving over the quantum Fisher information approach, which requires diagonalisation of the density matrix.

arXiv:1401.5358•Jan 21, 2014•0 citations
The Wigner quasiprobability, along with some of its essentialproperties, is introduced and discussed in two versions, first covering real canonical variables such as W(q,p) and second a pair of complex conjugate coordinates such as W(α,α*). The reconstruction of the density operator ϱ of states is also given. Building upon the Susskind–Glogower concept of quantum phase operators, further aspects of phase operator algebras in the quantum optics of a harmonic oscillator are discussed in relation to the realization of the su(1,1) Lie algebra. Coherent phase states |ε⟩ are introduced in analogy to the common coherent states |α⟩ in two ways, as both eigenstates of certain operators and as states generated from a ground state |0⟩ by operators of the Lie group SU(1,1). The limiting transition to the non-normalizable Fritz London phase states |eiφ⟩ on the unit circle and an (over)-completeness relation for the coherent phase states are derived. The Wigner quasiprobability W(q,p) for the coherent phase states is calculated and graphically represented. From the Wigner quasiprobability, a phase distribution W(φ) is calculated by integrating over the radius, and its uncertainty is defined and presented. The Hilbert–Schmidt distance is discussed as a measure of the non-classicality of states, where most of our with Viktor Dodonov work was carried out.
Phase properties of squeezed number states and squeezed thermal states are studied. Exact analytical formulae for phase distributions based on different phase approaches are derived and illustrated graphically. It is shown that the phase quasiprobability distribution P (W) ( theta ) associated with the Wigner function does not depend on the photon number of the initial number state and has the same form for both kinds of squeezed states under consideration while the Pegg-Barnett phase distribution and the phase quasiprobability distributions associated with the Q function and the Glauber-Sudarshan P function, approach P (W) ( theta ) in the limit of highly excited states.
Various quasiprobability distributions have been developed in the past using the Hilbert space of the single-mode light field. The development of a quasiprobability distribution associated with a phase operator has previously been impossible because of the absence of a unique Hermitian phase operator defined on the Hilbert space. Recently, however, Pegg and Barnett [Europhys. Lett. 6, 483 (1988); Phys. Rev. A 39, 1665 (1989)] and Barnett and Pegg [J. Mod. Optics 36, 7 (1989)] introduced a new formalism that does allow the construction of a Hermitian phase operator and associated phase eigenstates. In this paper we develop a quasiprobability distribution associated with the number and phase operators of the single-mode light field in the new formalism. The new distribution, which we call the number-phase Wigner function, has properties analogous to the Wigner function. We also derive the number-phase Wigner representation of number states, phase states, general physical states, coherent states, and the squeezed vacuum. We find this new representation has features that are related to the number and phase properties of states. For example, the number-phase Wigner representation of a number state is nonzero only on a circle, while the representation of a phase state is only nonzero along a radial line.
We propose a new generalised formalism for estimating the quantum phase uncertainty of pure and mixed continuous-variable quantum states and compare this with the phase uncertainty given by the quantum Fisher information. In order to preserve the Hermiticity of the operators, we use the Heisenberg and Schroedinger uncertainty relations to derive expressions for the phase uncertainty from generalised Susskind-Glogower operators. This formalism not only offers the possibility of directly measuring quantum phase uncertainties in a cavity-QED experiment but also gives a significant computational saving over the quantum Fisher information approach, which requires diagonalisation of the density matrix.