Via the hydrodynamical formulation of quantum mechanics, a unified protocol to treat the quantum time-dependent harmonic oscillator with friction is presented, described by two different models: an explicitly time-dependent, linear Schrödinger equation (Caldirola–Kanai model) and a logarithmic nonlinear Schrödinger equation (Kostin model). For the former model, an Ermakov system that makes it possible to obtain an invariant of Ermakov–Lewis-type is derived. For the latter model, a non-Ermakov system is derived instead and it is shown that neither an exact nor an approximate invariant of Ermakov–Lewis-type exists.
Via the hydrodynamical formulation of quantum mechanics, a unified protocol to treat the quantum time-dependent harmonic oscillator with friction is presented, described by two different models: an explicitly time-dependent, linear Schrödinger equation (Caldirola–Kanai model) and a logarithmic nonlinear Schrödinger equation (Kostin model). For the former model, an Ermakov system that makes it possible to obtain an invariant of Ermakov–Lewis-type is derived. For the latter model, a non-Ermakov system is derived instead and it is shown that neither an exact nor an approximate invariant of Ermakov–Lewis-type exists.
Via the quantum-hydrodynamical method, a time-dependent invariant associated to the quantum dissipative time-dependent harmonic oscillator (TDHO), described by two classes of nonlinear Schrödinger–Langevin equations with the following frictional nonlinear terms is constructed: (i) W1=−iℏν(ln ψ−〈ln ψ〉), which is the Schuch–Chung–Hartman frictional nonlinear term, and (ii) W2=ν{[x−〈x〉][cp̂+(1−c)〈 p̂〉]− 1/2 iℏc}, which includes the Süssmann (c=1), the Hasse (c= 1/2 ), and the Albrecht–Kostin (c=0) frictional nonlinear operators. The associated invariant found is exact for the Schuch–Chung–Hartman and Hasse models, and only approximate for the Süssman and Albrecht–Kostin models.
In a former publication [D. Schuch and M. Moshinsky, Phys. Rev. A 73, 062111 (2006)] we have shown that the time evolution of a quantum system with at most quadratic Hamiltonian that can be described by different methods, namely, the time-dependent Schrödinger equation, the time propagator or Feynman kernel, and the Wigner function is connected via a dynamical invariant, the so-called Ermakov invariant. Since exact invariants of this type also exist for certain effective descriptions of dissipative quantum systems, we will show the relations between these descriptions and the corresponding invariants and will discuss how the results obtained for the conservative systems must be modified in the presence of a linear velocity dependent frictional force.
The harmonic oscillator with a time-dependent frequency has a family of linear quantum invariants for the time-dependent Schrödinger equation, which are determined by any two independent solutions to the classical equation of motion. Ermakov and Pinney have shown that a general solution to the time-dependent oscillator with an inverse cubic term can be expressed in terms of two independent solutions to the time-dependent oscillator. We explore the connection between linear quantum invariants and the Ermakov-Pinney solution for the time-dependent harmonic oscillator. We advance a novel method to construct Ermakov-Pinney solutions to a class of time-dependent oscillators and the wave functions for the time-dependent Schrödinger equation. We further show that the first and the second Pöschl-Teller potentials belong to a special class of exact time-dependent oscillators. A perturbation method is proposed for any slowly-varying time-dependent frequency.
The concept of weak invariant is introduced. Then the weak invariants associated with time-dependent quantum dissipative systems are discussed in the context of master equations of the Lindblad type. In particular, with the help of the su(1,1) Lie-algebraic structure, the weak invariant is explicitly constructed for the quantum damped harmonic oscillator with the time-dependent frequency and friction coefficient. This generalizes the Lewis-Riesenfeld invariant to the case of nonunitary dynamics in the Markovian approximation.
In the first part of the lectures dynamical invariants in classical mechanics and conventional quantum mechanics will be considered. In particular, we will begin with some remarks on classical mechanics and on quantization in order to establish the theory in the form that will be used later on. Starting from the time‐dependent Schrödinger equation, the dynamics of Gaussian wave packets and Ermakov invariants, the time‐dependent Green function/Feynman kernel, quantum‐classical connections, energetics and Lagrange—Hamilton formalism for quantum uncertainties, momentum space representation and the relation between the Wigner function and the Ermakov invariant will be discussed. The representation of canonical transformations in time‐independent and time‐dependent quantum mechanics, factorization of the Ermakov invariant and generalized creation/annihilation operators will be studied. Subsequently, the time‐independent Schrödinger equation, leading to nonlinear quantum mechanics related to Riccati/Ermakov systems as well as the occurrence of Riccati/Ermakov systems in the treatment of Bose—Einstein condensates via the so‐called moment method will be analyzed.In part two, irreversible dynamics of dissipative systems, classical and quantum mechanical descriptions and corresponding invariants will be treated. After some general remarks on classical and quantum mechanics with unitary time‐evolution and energy conservation, phenomenological Langevin and Fokker—Planck equations, master equations in classical and quantum mechanics and the system‐plus‐reservoir approach will be mentioned briefly. Then follows a more detailed discussion of modified Schrödinger equations and, particularly, of a nonlinear Schrödinger equation with complex logarithmic nonlinearity; its properties, solutions, invariants and energetics will be studied. Finally, a comparison with a classical description in expanding coordinates will lead to a non‐unitary connection between the logarithmic nonlinear Schrödinger equation, the Caldirola‐Kanai approach and the expanding coordinate approach.
In the first part of the lectures dynamical invariants in classical mechanics and conventional quantum mechanics will be considered. In particular, we will begin with some remarks on classical mechanics and on quantization in order to establish the theory in the form that will be used later on. Starting from the time‐dependent Schrödinger equation, the dynamics of Gaussian wave packets and Ermakov invariants, the time‐dependent Green function/Feynman kernel, quantum‐classical connections, energetics and Lagrange—Hamilton formalism for quantum uncertainties, momentum space representation and the relation between the Wigner function and the Ermakov invariant will be discussed. The representation of canonical transformations in time‐independent and time‐dependent quantum mechanics, factorization of the Ermakov invariant and generalized creation/annihilation operators will be studied. Subsequently, the time‐independent Schrödinger equation, leading to nonlinear quantum mechanics related to Riccati/Ermakov systems as well as the occurrence of Riccati/Ermakov systems in the treatment of Bose—Einstein condensates via the so‐called moment method will be analyzed.In part two, irreversible dynamics of dissipative systems, classical and quantum mechanical descriptions and corresponding invariants will be treated. After some general remarks on classical and quantum mechanics with unitary time‐evolution and energy conservation, phenomenological Langevin and Fokker—Planck equations, master equations in classical and quantum mechanics and the system‐plus‐reservoir approach will be mentioned briefly. Then follows a more detailed discussion of modified Schrödinger equations and, particularly, of a nonlinear Schrödinger equation with complex logarithmic nonlinearity; its properties, solutions, invariants and energetics will be studied. Finally, a comparison with a classical description in expanding coordinates will lead to a non‐unitary connection between the logarithmic nonlinear Schrödinger equation, the Caldirola‐Kanai approach and the expanding coordinate approach.